Apple iPhone 4s
if you see the benchmarks , you can say it's amazing or not inside s2
- 2011-10-12 06:40
brilliant os! siri ftw!
- 2011-10-12 05:33
> In reply to style @ 2011-10-12 01:47 from IDeq - click to readthats cause of android, as u said the Galaxy has better hardware then there is no way that it can perform worse that the iphone. Just having hardware does not help, u need software side capability as well
- 2011-10-12 04:42
Wow, Apple made it to 8mp! Welcome to 2010, you'r only two years late!
- 2011-10-12 03:35
So I wait all this long and still get a gadget coming in at a far second place against SG2!! To cap it off_Samsung unleash Nexus Prime + purport SG3? So that means the gadget will sonnest b at No.4 at best!! pathetic.
- 2011-10-12 03:31
> In reply to [deleted post]Well, I can say the same thing to you! You think you know everything and Proffessor Know about phones? I need to see your certificate!
- 2011-10-12 03:29
it's such an ironic thing that people (android users - red) try to bring this phone down by the poor rating, but this phone still the best selling smartphone !!! 1 mill pre-orders in 24 hours !!! that's surely a new record !!
so just stop bringing this phone down by rating it very low.. just admit it is such an awesome smartphone !!!
- 2011-10-12 03:08
> In reply to phone man @ 2011-10-11 15:25 from vuPs - click to readmaybe you should watch the benchmark, iphone 4s is almost twice faster than sg2
- 2011-10-12 03:06
- greyhound man
> In reply to phone man @ 2011-10-11 15:25 from vuPs - click to readYa right you haven't even seen the phone yet and I have yet to see any phone as good as an iphone.
- 2011-10-12 02:18
> In reply to Joey4711 @ 2011-10-11 22:13 from PaZJ - click to readYou can't possible call photoshopped benchmark testing screen shots as doing your "research".
You just believe whatever iphone fans post and say ?
iphone4s can't be faster then sgs2 when it has half the amount of ram and 20% slower gpu. That's like saying the 3gs is posting better results then the normaly galaxy s
- 2011-10-12 01:47
Analysts predict sales of 3 million this weekend, and possibly 25 million units sold this quarter:
- 2011-10-11 23:38
> In reply to Joey4711 @ 2011-10-11 22:13 from PaZJ - click to readI did some research too, Apple said it is super duper faster
and bestest than any other phone out there.
Believe me, apple said so. Looool
- 2011-10-11 23:26
the 3G scored higher....
- 2011-10-11 22:44
> In reply to phone man @ 2011-10-11 15:25 from vuPs - click to readWhere do you get your facts from ? If you research a bit you'll find that the latest benchmarks demonstrate that the iPhone 4S is up to twice as fast as the Galaxy S II.
No matter how much hate the iOS gets, it is still the standard which every single manufacturer tries to either match or beat. It is stil the biggest market share on a SINGLE device. It is still the most fluid and efficient user experience on a smartphone.
- 2011-10-11 22:13
> In reply to phone man @ 2011-10-11 15:25 from vuPs - click to readi phone is the best phone ever
- 2011-10-11 22:10
> In reply to androidrules @ 2011-10-11 20:53 from 0x7d - click to readThanks! Tried to answer in the simplest manner, yours is much more detailed.
- 2011-10-11 21:24
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-10-11 07:24 from Q72c - click to readI do know a lot about phones, and I know what it is when my iphone 4 freezes due to lack of RAM space when I use it heavily. Also I get temperature error in normal room temperature, its says:" cool down your phone and then continiue"
Anyway, every body knows that iphone 4 is for average user, if you want advanced phone, you go for Nokia N9 or Galaxy S II...
- 2011-10-11 20:57
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-10-11 18:24 from 3Ybw - click to readYou're right on most part, but let me correct you a bit :) The pixel density on the SGSII and the iPhone is 217 and 329 respectively. What this means is, that the iPhone screen is much sharper, and will be able to portray much more info (and much more detail) on a smaller area, so essentially, it will be better in sharpness at any given distance. Now, the 329 ppi of the Retina screen are very, very close to the capacity of the human eye, so if you have average sight, you won't be able to tell the pixels apart even if you look at it very closely. As for the GSII, you will be able to see the pixels, but only if you look at it very up close, probably closer than you will ever bother to look. And the advantage of the Super Amoled Plus is contrast. It has the highest contrast (practically infinite) of any smartphone screen out there (except Super Amoled itself ofc), so you will have eye-popping colors. It also has a greater area - 4,3' vs. 3,5'. So, you really need to determine which one of these feautures is the most important to you and decide accordingly.
P.S: If you really want to push it, here is a comparison of a very up close shot of each of the screens - http://st.gsmarena.com/vv/revi...rena_036.jpg
If you ask me, it basically comes down to which size screen you prefer, because both offer the best image quality on the market at the moment.
- 2011-10-11 20:53
Galaxy SGSII's ppi is 217 not 315..
- 2011-10-11 20:17
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-10-11 19:05 from 47S} - click to readThat is not a valid point..Mobile phones had 1.8-2.4 inch screens not so long ago but people still bought them..There wasnt a long queue for the opticians in 1999 when only little greyscale screens were on mobiles.
- 2011-10-11 19:27