EXCLUSIVE: We get the allegedly proper Nexus Prime specs

06 October, 2011
Hours after the first leak, a Google insider comes up and paints a totally different Nexus Prime picture for us.

Sort by:

  • Anonymous

"completely and utterly wrong"

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-21 21:34
  • j}F6
  • Anonymous

I think that the 4,65 inches are not too much because the nexus won´t have buttons. So the Nexus will be as big as phones with buttons and a smaller display!

Just my opinion

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-17 20:36
  • 0$px
  • Anonymous

Biggest network has the worst phones. With the rumors of 2 diff. Galaxy Nexuses coming stateside. I'm dreading the launch announcewment cuz Verizon always finds a way to botch "exclusive" releases. If Verizon skipped SGSII, to get this phone exclusively, in the States. If this thing launches on VZW as Galaxy Nexus w/ a 1.2GHZ proc. & a 5mp camera. That's fine and dandy. If this phone is only a temp. exclusive release that's to be followed by the "alternately specced Prime(1.5GHZ, 8mp cam), on other carriers. I'm gonna go ballistic.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-12 09:31
  • ILQ0
  • Anonymous

I think the reason for the better specs was to address the performance gap that would of resulted from the new iPhone 4S. This is very similar to what happen to the Galaxy Tab 10.1 when Apple came out with the iPad2. By honoring Jobs death would give Samsung more time to "fix" the Nexus Prime so it be "the" super phone we all want it to be. I cannot confirm anywhere on the internet that the Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 Ghz will be paired with the GPU PowerVR SGX 543MP2 (same GPU in the iPad2 and iPhone 4S). Instead, I only "see" evidence of the GPU ARM Mali-400 MP4 which is not in the same league as the PowerVR. (See AnandTech articles http://www.anandtech.com/show/...e-gpufor-now and http://www.anandtech.com/show/...e#comments). I hope I'm wrong....

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-11 22:10
  • NVSE
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Tizen Takeover @ 2011-10-10 16:04 from qBMj - click to readLets hope the battery is over 2000 mAh

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-11 18:55
  • p7in
  • Anonymous

That screen is to big... this is not a tablet it's a phone!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-11 15:01
  • QUhC
  • jay

I can't wait for this phone to come out for sure .

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-11 10:16
  • kCf%
  • Tizen Takeover

> In reply to Tizen Takeover @ 2011-10-10 16:04 from qBMj - click to readCan somebody elaborate?

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-10 16:05
  • qBMj
  • Tizen Takeover

I've heard from other sources that the battery is a 1700mah battery not 2050mah.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-10 16:04
  • qBMj
  • Alex

> In reply to saurav @ 2011-10-09 06:06 from 9CHE - click to readyeah their software doesn't need much power because it SUCKS!
Nokia is just an epic fail in the smartphone business!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-10 10:01
  • 9xHb
  • Anonymous

> In reply to saurav @ 2011-10-09 06:06 from 9CHE - click to readlol you are actually lamenting a brand for using LESS power than Nokia?

An android phone may well require the extra power. Cuase y'know, Android phones have these things called APPS. They're all the rage with the kids right now.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-10 07:53
  • Ia90
  • asingha94

n9 much better!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-09 06:36
  • U@kI
  • saurav

dey r fools or wot? samsung? ha ha . .compare wid d Nokia N9 . .it can run by 1GHZ procesor meeGo..it is enouugh fr N9 to run faster..comparing to samsung who kep releasing deir which is 1.5GHZ procesor?? dats a shame..deir software needs to much power to run deir smartphnes.. & Nokia's 1GHZ is enough..! its lyk samsungs 12MP camera comparing wid Nokia's N8 8MP camera..& stil Nokia wins in d quality..!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-09 06:06
  • 9CHE
  • SgtMoo

> In reply to farbror Melker @ 2011-10-08 19:49 from m}GE - click to readha, my Galaxy S pulls about 4-5 days without charge, obviously you have some kinda crap chinese knockoff phone

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-09 06:00
  • tZqE
  • cubatista92

i don't thing the battery specs are truthful. it'd be good if they are, but with such a slim phone i doubt it. also, none of the other samsung devices have a battery remotely close to that size, so i doubt that's gonna happen. the rest may be true, but the battery thing did strike me as improbable.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-09 02:05
  • 4rpc
  • LittleHorus

> In reply to farbror Melker @ 2011-10-08 19:49 from m}GE - click to readThis is an OLED screen with the softkeys on the screen...

OLED isn't back-lit like LCD. It uses induced bio-luminescence. It's generally more power efficient than LCD. Additionally, the darker the screen, the less power it takes. Because the soft-keys section is not active, the actual screen portion using power during most use-cases is closer to 4.5in.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-09 00:44
  • 7yvq
  • Anonymous

> In reply to samart @ 2011-10-07 09:56 from mEA2 - click to readwhat? samsung makes the a5, aka exynos + sgx532

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-08 23:44
  • ImmR
  • KSH

"Which specifications list sound more plausible to you?"

Since Samsung already announced the more high-end spec phone, entitled the Galaxy S II HD LTE, on September 26th (in Korea) it is not just plausible that phone will be released here as the Nexus Prime, but highly probable. What, are they going to invent a completely new phone in the meantime?

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-08 23:16
  • Ixh0
  • farbror Melker

GSMArena: "As for the battery, expect a 2050mAh one (do we hear a whoa?), which should be good for a couple of days use without charging."

Why do you guys keep doing it? Modern touch-phones last at best 24 hours with 30% left. Then its time to recharge. The increased 2050mAh capicity is all neutralized thanks to the unnecessary big 4.65 screen with bigger rezolution on top of that. Stop kidding yourself.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-08 19:49
  • m}GE
  • Brandon

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-10-08 09:53 from pXjm - click to readLol comparing this device to a Nokia N9..

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-08 16:21
  • mB}4