T-Mobile and Samsung introduce Galaxy S Blaze 4G

11 January, 2012
T-Mobile and Samsung announce the HSPA+ Galaxy S Blaze 4G smartphone.

Sort by:

  • nike free run 2

> In reply to blah @ 2012-01-11 21:11 from jR@A - click to readThanks for your excellent post! nike free run 2

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-14 17:25
  • ukhh
  • which is better lcd

> In reply to blah @ 2012-01-11 21:11 from jR@A - click to readAn excellent opportunity my site for you. which is better lcd or led

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-11 06:35
  • uWHB
  • mayur

samsung plz try something new

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-15 08:23
  • tUdx
  • Robert J Lichota

Maybe it is just me, but I think that there are too many stars in that galaxy name. Losing track.
Robert Lichota

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-13 07:02
  • miZk
  • Sam

Maybe Samsung must change their phone's name. Because of the old galaxy s get no update, their costumer was disappointed, and began to leave samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-12 15:33
  • vfxa
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Angel M. @ 2012-01-11 20:37 from s9XK - click to readIt probably looks like the other because it's still a Galaxy S, as the name suggest. It's a Galaxy S with 42Mbps HSPA+, its not like they're naming it Galaxy XYS, or something else. It's an updated Galaxy S(original Galaxy S) because T-Mobile isn't getting as many high profile phones as ATT, Verizon, or Sprint. If anything this is probably because T mobile wanted this.

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 23:28
  • keqR
  • Drporat

Yeah... Thats why google choose them for the nexus

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 22:25
  • pqJK
  • Anonymous

Samsung dumps another carrier specific phone to the market and they will wash their hands off it in no time. By the look of Galaxy S and Tab they will get few updates and if they do they will have to wait for a long time for them.

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 21:48
  • pJcT
  • blah

man... all you guys do is complain if you dont like it move on to something else!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 21:11
  • jR@A
  • Angel M.

Samsung... Another phone that looks exaxctly like all the others, how disappointing!

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 20:37
  • s9XK
  • Motionman

Just seems there ain't any mobile to waste my cash on!
I mean come on!Sammy just displays various versions of the same phone in order to get a sale and you guys fall for it!BE SERUOUS SAMSUNG!
I am wasting my hard earned money here?

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 19:17
  • uNVK
  • Anonymous

who cares about originalitty...i want functionality

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 17:11
  • fufa
  • s

they r tryng to copy the hardware frm htc amaze dats y they took a resembling name blaze lol...

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 17:04
  • Rx5}
  • Anonymous

> In reply to lennard @ 2012-01-11 15:20 from v0qT - click to readApple copied Samsung..Fact

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 16:35
  • ee@n
  • CaptainP

What are you talking about? People can post here all they want if they don't like Samsung phones. Anything relevent is worth a post and an opinion, whether for or against, is relevent.

Personally I think it's kind of a pointless phone. The Koreans are brilliant manufacturers and have great execution, but the marketing and placement...not so much.

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 16:25
  • QA8p
  • k!ck

its 42Mbps ....lolzzzzz

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 16:23
  • 7tL8
  • Anonymous

> In reply to lennard @ 2012-01-11 15:20 from v0qT - click to readWOW it's the first month of the year, why so miserable & serious? Didn't santa bring you anything nice? Well maybe if you behave yourself this year & try being nice he might surprise you this year smh

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 15:29
  • nxWw
  • lennard

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-01-11 15:16 from Ssg@ - click to readI'm I reading Original.... when was the first time samsung makes original... they don't... they were scrap of Apple... poor samsung...

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 15:20
  • v0qT
  • Anonymous

if samsung phones dont like you,dont post any opinion about them

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 15:16
  • Ssg@
  • ekton

we are done galaxy s, give us some thing else.

  • Reply
  • 2012-01-11 15:07
  • ftVi