> In reply to Cowz @ 2012-05-04 20:12 from vxKC - click to readget a life...learn the diff btw a tab and a phone....
- 2012-05-05 14:57
> In reply to Cowz @ 2012-05-04 20:12 from vxKC - click to readbecause the s3 isnt a tablet and it is infact a PHONE
- 2012-05-05 13:06
- htc sense
> In reply to ,,i,, @ 2012-05-04 08:28 from 3JDB - click to readyes i ever heard that but you must know that the first phone have ability to find phone from internet is HTC
- 2012-05-05 10:22
> In reply to Kautkto @ 2012-05-05 07:49 from t@QY - click to readThere are plenty of tablets that can make phone calls.
- 2012-05-05 09:00
> In reply to Cowz @ 2012-05-04 20:12 from vxKC - click to readCowz,
Galaxy S3 is not a tablet. (athough its large display may feel like a tablet) Its the newly anticipated successor to the Samsung Galaxy S2 (or S II) smartphone. Maybe you haven't heard about it yet, but it was just unveiled 2 days ago in London. (if you haven't seen it, you can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as9OyqTVmxM
- 2012-05-05 08:48
Tablets can't make phone calls, this device can. Hence phone, not tablet.
- 2012-05-05 07:49
Im surprised samsung will be sticking to this design for thier flagship. Looks like something youll find at toys r us! Child safe with all rounded corners! It should come in red!....damn blind people
- 2012-05-05 06:04
you have inter changed the benchmarks of one x and one s
- 2012-05-05 05:50
> In reply to Cowz @ 2012-05-04 20:12 from vxKC - click to readIts not a tablet.
- 2012-05-05 01:27
These results are not impressive. Why is the S3 tablet being compared to phones?
- 2012-05-04 20:12
- I love to argue
- 2012-05-04 19:54
- I love to argue
> In reply to Whatchasay @ 2012-05-04 07:06 from 4$ve - click to readnot necessary. a lot depends on on software optimization. even if there is a difference then it'll be so marginal that you'll barely notice.
- 2012-05-04 19:52
Awesome! But I wanna see camera pics and a video of someone using the system, so we could analyse how all this power will help in interface!
- 2012-05-04 16:22
> In reply to I love to argue @ 2012-05-04 06:12 from vGAA - click to readActually, One S has a qHD resolution of 540x960 and NOT wvga of 480x800!
- 2012-05-04 14:46
> In reply to Mgh @ 2012-05-04 13:40 from iKNW - click to readWhoa there little doggy. Read before you post. If you click on the comment i was replying to, you will see that i was comparing the OneS and OneX. It was a simple query. Stopped being so easily offended.
- 2012-05-04 14:14
> In reply to Whatchasay @ 2012-05-04 07:06 from 4$ve - click to readReally?!
But I Have Diffrent Idea!
See The Benchmarks again and focus on GALAXY S III !!!
- 2012-05-04 13:40
2100mAh is not suitable for quad core processor
- 2012-05-04 12:40
- Nuts, you are
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-04 08:39 from M%VI - click to readPaper specs does not mean it will be miles ahead with regard to performance. It will have a barely noticeable difference against high end dual core droids with proper software optimizations given a specfic hardware. Have they utilized properly the dual core last year? NO. Synthetic benchmarks will be just for bragging rights at this point in time.
- 2012-05-04 12:38
So which one is better ?
Samsung's Exynos 4-Quad at 1.4GHz or Huawei's K3V2 at 1.5GHz?
- 2012-05-04 11:54
Camera mp is quantity not quality!look at 8 mp dslr canon professional camera!and 16 mp photos of htc titan 2 that my s2 and iphone 4s takes better pictures!if you want good dynamic range gerat contrast less noise etc you should go for cameras that have good optics and sensors.go for quality instead of quantity
- 2012-05-04 09:25