The impressive Samsung Galaxy S III benchmarks are here

03 May, 2012
The new Exynos 4 Quad chipset inside the Galaxy S III made easy work of the competition in our benchmarks.

Sort by:

  • Anonymous

ugliest phone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 01:17
  • Xufd
  • Rocky

really really disappointing..!!!! I am a great samsung fan and had planned to replace my SGS2 with new SGS3, had even registered with phones4u to get the device at earliest convenience but it's a crap, nothing so impressive, better to stay with my S2..:(((

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:59
  • HD%F
  • yaya

No GLbench? What sup with still using ol mali400, on GLbench tegra 3 will beat the crap out mali400, i'm not paying premium price for old gpu, sammy u should'v been better than this...geez!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:56
  • Qxpq
  • Anonymous

The Samsung Galaxy Note II will kill this beast!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:52
  • 46g3
  • weckl

Compare it with Ascend D quad and Meizu MX quad too in the July and we'll see if Samsung s3 can deal with them.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:52
  • iB2g
  • NS

Well i think Samsung galaxy nexus is still the best looking phone and best value for money on the market. atleast with google flagship phones u can expect to be the first one to receive software updates.
S III just looks horrible from design perspective, and please get rid of those physical buttons ICS support on screen buttons and they work like a charm.
i love samsung desings but this one is just not worth it.... once iphone5 comes samsung will sure come out with S4
another lawsuit on the horizon....

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:42
  • bYJd
  • Gion

Too bad, it's still a single core gpu. Gaming wise still the iPhone 4s way better.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:37
  • u7m9
  • lordofof

no 12 megapixel camera
no ceramic body
no RGB screen
no better processer

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:34
  • dT2U
  • Atepeye

Nothing special, no ceramic body, no water resistant, extremely large phone, Do you need that size?, please, any good reason for that. Simply don't like it, I will go fo an iPhone 4S.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:33
  • P1j{
  • Poke

> In reply to Quality @ 2012-05-03 23:49 from QuDB - click to readPlease.. You don't know what you're talking about, take a look at this: http://www.swedroid.se/wp-cont...-600x299.jpg

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:33
  • m{h6
  • paulreedsmith

> In reply to Mark @ 2012-05-03 23:55 from muL{ - click to readThe s2 killed the Iphone one year ago

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:21
  • nbuE
  • Anonymous

Supercurio confirmed Wolfson DAC in this one, I"m sold.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:15
  • i2Gt
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Quality @ 2012-05-03 23:49 from QuDB - click to readYou have to think battery life too . And the possibility to buy a bigger one :) Htc and Apple don't give you that choice .

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:14
  • 3RLc
  • Anonymous

I just ran a Qudrant scan on my Samsung Galaxy S II, with android 4,0. The benchmark said 4029

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:10
  • 0upb
  • Big T

are you guys blind.....look at the benchmarks .....haters will be haters.....SG3 all the why...

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:09
  • 4Cyt
  • open

practical, future proof
what else do you need

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:08
  • K1KK
  • Dragisha

All this is amazing, but this design?
It's uglyyy.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:02
  • JA$d