The impressive Samsung Galaxy S III benchmarks are here
- D
- AnonD-13349
- Rfx
- 03 May 2012
In fact Linpack single thread,Linpack multi thread, Nenamark 2(fps), Nenamark 1 (fps), and Vellamo, all show the snapdragon beating the exynos.
- e
- et
- sGV
- 03 May 2012
Impressive results, last year s2 was the king & this year undoubtedly s3 will be the king and Sammy will remain the king in mobile phone world.............
- w
- wiss
- JEv
- 03 May 2012
blowin mind
- m
- mk
- pWs
- 03 May 2012
yeaaa but why it looks like a chinese knockout?
- p
- ph00ny
- kx$
- 03 May 2012
Mali400MP gave the samsung the victory? More like Nvidia utilizing single 32bit channel memory controller gave Samsung and Qualcomm the victory
- ?
- Anonymous
- nIG
- 03 May 2012
Performance benchmarks are irrelevant - we have more than enough performance with a 1GHz single core on a phone. All that matters now is BATTERY, BATTERY, BATTERY!!!!
- l
- lashton
- i2G
- 03 May 2012
aDyingApril, 03 May 2012Why isn't Huawei Ascend D quad XL in this test?bthe Asend D and Quad XL are not in here becqause, they are not avaliable yet possibly, and the Quad XL will KILL the S3 and make the phone look bad!
- M
- ME
- gCX
- 03 May 2012
who cares about benchmarks?i dont buy a phone to play on it or to bechmark it!this phone is one of the uglyest phone i seen in the last time!S II looks better then this cheap look
- D
- AnonD-13349
- Rfx
- 03 May 2012
Engadget's scores tel a completely different story where the it basically ties with the snapdragon in the one x.
- D
- AnonD-49259
- fXw
- 03 May 2012
nice:) but the comments make me laugh. a few hours ago you all were crying like a bunch of big babbies about the design and specs. now the benchmarks come out and all of a sudden you change your story.
you ppl are crazy.
- D
- Dave
- myA
- 03 May 2012
1st- of all this is a phone not a pro-camera.
2nd- Quad core its needed on android bc the HTC one x duel-core lags like crazy.
3rd- the devices did NOT increase only the screen so its the same as the Gs2 with bigger inside screen.
4th- it have amoled and and physical battery of 2100. and for the kill it comes with a MicroSD SLOT+ inside memory ..... so yeah -.-"
HTC One fans try not to cry
- P
- Piotrek
- mM3
- 03 May 2012
Quad-core will eat even 2100 mAh battery. I would prefer A15 dual-core.
- B
- Blankman
- nEf
- 03 May 2012
This is a monster.
But real world usage will tell a clearer story. Benchmarks don't mean that much.
- J
- Jabba
- Nhg
- 03 May 2012
Sorry for my ignorance but why is the Galaxy Note phone/tablet hybrid used in the first test but the Galaxy Note 10.1 used in the second two tests? What's a 10 inch tab doing competing with handsets? Shouldn't it be the hybrid competing in all 3 tests ?
- S
- Saeed
- HFH
- 03 May 2012
I've been using sii for nearly 7 months and i like it because it does everything u throw at it fast and satisfying. Before reading benchmarks i thought i will not change it for a year but now i'm thinking i may give sii a try and possibly upgrade to siii.
- s
- saman
- pT6
- 03 May 2012
what? camera is 8mp? 30fp? !!!! why? very very bad.
galaxy s3= galaxy s2
only galaxy s2 only
very very bad ...................
- D
- AnonD-1968
- 0wq
- 03 May 2012
you dont wanna mess with SAMSUNG!
- M
- Mr brightside
- naP
- 03 May 2012
The king of all phones by specs. Only that pentile screen strucks me..
- T
- TooT
- fn8
- 03 May 2012
Although i am disappointed by the ordinary design, i believe the first benchmarks are very positive. lets hope the price is reasonable.
- a
- aDyingApril
- 3s5
- 03 May 2012
Why isn't Huawei Ascend D quad XL in this test?