Alleged Galaxy S IV benchmark scores surface online

13 February, 2013
The device in question is running on a Qualcomm MSM8960 and performs favorably against the competition.

Sort by:

  • Anonymous

> In reply to skingg @ 2013-02-13 09:18 from uCw@ - click to readYou wanna go down history? Tell me something about Samsung's bada os. Arc s vs s2? Samsung s2 suck even sucks more on JB. While arc s is smoothly sailing on ics. Btw samsung phones cant support apps2sd.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-22 17:13
  • v0qJ
  • RubixM4ster

> In reply to Killer Droid @ 2013-02-13 17:29 from QGtq - click to readHow you manage to troll on my comment is amazing. I dont have an iphone 5 i have a 4s.

And it doesnt scratch at all, in fact i've had it for 16 months and it looks like i've just taken it out of the box. its called looking after the things you own.

If your phone gets scratched and battered thats down to lack of care, although build quality does have an impact its not the be all end all factor. Go Troll somewhere else.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-14 12:59
  • mX1L
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-13 23:38 from mG@@ - click to readDon't know where you got your information from. Dragontail is 5 times stronger than typical soda lime glass. Corning Gorilla Glass 2 is not of the soda lime type so Dragontail is definately not 6 times stronger...

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-14 10:03
  • 2C%9
  • Anonymous

Sony don't design for Android thats why people can't relay on Sony always
Can't update latest version Sony will get crash with old version.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-14 09:47
  • nI@4
  • DAN13L

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-13 20:45 from QYn6 - click to readObviously this person has never used an Android phone and is just trolling, Thus the anonymous user name.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 23:55
  • kxIs
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Denzo @ 2013-02-13 22:25 from IPtL - click to readYes, it has Dragontrail glass, that meand it's 6 times stronger than Corning 2 glass and 4 times stronger than Corning 3 glass.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 23:38
  • mG@@
  • UCGILL

in my opinion going fo sony is a bad bad idea. because when u use the phone your interference it totaly on the os you are using not on the design. And sony is worse at developing the android rom. This is the only reason no one buys sony and its going in loss. Its a grt design. exceptional build quality but OS running in it have to be more exceptional then the hardware design and build quality.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 23:04
  • j0c1
  • Kaln0x

> In reply to changegame @ 2013-02-13 15:17 from XM0j - click to readThanks for the heads up.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 22:43
  • 8yUK
  • Denzo

> In reply to Killer Droid @ 2013-02-13 17:29 from QGtq - click to readXPERIA Z has glass panels..

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 22:25
  • IPtL
  • Anonymous

this will suffer from the same problem, which is, this phone will lag once its loaded with applications again. Samsung and google will never learn. Actually no, all android phones suffer from this. Which is mass lag when loaded with applications. Even more lag if your sd card is inserted. Wow.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 20:45
  • QYn6
  • Anonymous

> In reply to Imagewerx @ 2013-02-13 20:12 from 3GCn - click to readlag ? this 2013 not 2007 you probably bought a chinese knock off

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 20:15
  • 3iJC
  • Imagewerx

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-13 15:07 from vjqe - click to readWhat battery drain and lag? My Galaxy S would last 2-3 days on one charge and had no lag I could see and my Galaxy S3 lasts a couple of days and again no lag that anyone born on earth can see.
It makes me laugh out loud when ignorant people who have nothing better to do can only regurgitate made up rubbish they've read elsewhere on the internet and quite clearly don't have a clue what they're talking about.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 20:12
  • 3GCn
  • Tiger

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-13 14:22 from m7KR - click to readYou could of course try growing up and act like a man rather than the rear end of a pantomime horse :) lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 19:54
  • Sgv7
  • Zzzzz

> In reply to RubixM4ster @ 2013-02-13 17:11 from mX1L - click to readu can go for Virtu Ti.. it has best build quality n none plastic...lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 19:00
  • uvgA
  • Killer Droid

> In reply to RubixM4ster @ 2013-02-13 17:11 from mX1L - click to readLol another ignorant xperia Z is also made of plastic genius!!!

I hope that your are happy with your scratched iphone 5..

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 17:29
  • QGtq
  • RubixM4ster

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-13 14:22 from m7KR - click to readi am inclined to agree with you on your points. I am an iphone user. The only reason why i dont go samsung is because i dont like plastic handsets. Experia Z is a great phone.. I'm not sure i'd go for the Sony out of personal choice. But its a well built good performer.

I'm not sure why samsung dont focus on the build quality more. If they built the phones as well as their TV's im sure they would be laughing (even more) all the way to the bank.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 17:11
  • mX1L
  • Gongaerddro

> In reply to i hate plastic @ 2013-02-13 15:34 from vV5G - click to readYour answer is nothing but hate! It's just your naive opinion and you sound like a helpless enemy of sammy because you lack any arguments

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 16:17
  • 0kpq
  • i hate plastic

Hi all phone lover,
Its not because the galaxy series sell so well!!!!.......

From this news ....we can judge ...that....sammy going to put "shit" chipset in their phone again.....unless they throw the exynos chips n switch to qualcom......
The next galaxy series is "not" prepare for the next contender...

Haaa hahaaaa.....im goin to laugh again n again....

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 15:34
  • vV5G
  • Anonymous

> In reply to INDROID @ 2013-02-13 15:02 from U{7A - click to readS3 is in the market long time ago. And you're comparing its sales to a phone thats no yet released to the market. Very clever.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-13 15:25
  • v0qJ