Press images of Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo leaked

22 January, 2014
The press renders of the Galaxy Note 3 Neo show the entire design of the upcoming phablet.

Sort by:

  • maddy009

$812 ? Its bigger brother Note 3 with much higher specs has currently the price tag of about $700.

How preposterous!Cant understand the logic behind this.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 12:44
  • t}5X
  • Falcon

> In reply to Elia @ 2014-01-23 04:19 from Kiip - click to readWell I live in a 3rd would country these types of phone are used. But most ppl that I know uses low end Sammy devices. And I really hated WP because of the lack of apps. But it was good overall :)

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 12:03
  • fqMU
  • Anonymous

"The official announcement of the Galaxy Note 3 Neo might happen any day now"
Looking at the pictures you can tell it'll be announced at Jan 27.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 11:52
  • L2WD
  • Jarret

Samsung does things that Apple don't want to do...
Serve for humankind...

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 09:05
  • 25GS
  • skyzo97

it got high specification but the screen is 720p

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 07:27
  • uCnx
  • Harry

> In reply to iFairPlay @ 2014-01-22 22:44 from 3$2g - click to readWow, a bit harsh there.

Poor people need to be on the network as much as rich people.

However, I admit that Samsung can slow down spitting out those mid end phones.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 06:27
  • iiXs
  • Elia

> In reply to Falcon @ 2014-01-22 22:50 from fus} - click to readWow, Windows Mobile 6.1 ? That's a good OS, a bit comparable to android in terms of customization. Still better than WP though.
I never understand why MS stoop so low to locked-down WP OS while they already have great OS on their arsenal (WM 6.1).

Anyway, how do you get WM phone in this day & age ? If it still works perfect without problems then considered you're very lucky.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 04:19
  • Kiip
  • Anonymous

Note2 in a Note3 casing... =.="

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 03:50
  • IVQy
  • Anonymous

what??? $812??? the Galaxy Note 3 N9000 itself is only $650 here. are they out of their mind?

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 03:43
  • thtJ
  • M and M

> In reply to iFairPlay @ 2014-01-22 22:44 from 3$2g - click to readNot just the cheapest; I could count quite a bunch of samsung devices of 2013 with 2010 specs that sell above $200, which should be considered a crime... and about samsung flagships not lagging; have you tried snapping a picture indoors with the S4? chances are that it will take quite a few seconds to find focus and sometimes it will not find it at all and that is quite disturbing for a phone in that price bracket.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 03:10
  • 3bMv
  • Ted

This price is indeed outrageous!! 590?? I would rather buy the original Note 3 instead of neo. Expected the price to be far more cheaper.. something like 400 or 450 at most. Overpriced.....

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 02:55
  • 3@09
  • bbb12

> In reply to iFairPlay @ 2014-01-22 22:44 from 3$2g - click to readiFairplay what with your "Poor ppl should not have smartphones. They are shame for us.(lol)" even with your (lol) still does not tone down the harsh remark and certainly still does shadow the visibility of your dark heart.

You are full of your self, if you think that Note3 smartphone are an item of luxury, then pity you.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 02:36
  • PTFh
  • bbb12

> In reply to Gelvin - Maximus @ 2014-01-22 19:25 from sSP9 - click to readyeah but that are samsung with their usual seasonal branding strategies

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 02:28
  • PTFh
  • Aadrian

I find 599 pretty expensive. I would have expected it to be cheaper

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-23 00:36
  • 0wxc
  • Falcon

> In reply to iFairPlay @ 2014-01-22 22:44 from 3$2g - click to readNever say that again, you really don't want to be at there place, i have a galaxy S4, but 2 months ago i had a Samsung I900 running Windows mobile 6.1, never take anything for granted, you might be rich now but watch out for hard times

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 22:50
  • fus}
  • iFairPlay

> In reply to M and M @ 2014-01-22 22:15 from 3bMu - click to readSamsung flagship phones, don't lag, though. And only high-end Samsung phones sell more that Apple high-end phones(last 2 years models). And more than all android OEM's put together.
Those cheap Samsung smartphones you are talking about, are for poor ppl. And you are right. Samsung should stop to produce them. Poor ppl should not have smartphones. They are shame for us.(lol)

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 22:44
  • 3$2g
  • iFairPlay

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-01-22 19:53 from SvCp - click to readYup
Agree with you.
Giving much choices is not good for the consumers. it also will cut the prices, and the profit of Samsung. And samsung fan-boys will be attacked from Apple fan-boys that Apple make bigger profit, with less devices.
Apple is right there.
Apple care for their fans, to have what to brag with. And not to be confused with many device specs, and display size choices.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 22:34
  • 3$2g
  • tan

$812? are they going to sell the real note 3 for $1600 then?

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 22:34
  • q{2X
  • M and M

Samsung really produces so many different parts that they really need to make a product every $0.5 of the market prices,... the problem is that most products are either pointless (like this one) or useless, like many samsung phones that lag for seconds before even displaying the contact list.

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 22:15
  • 3bMu
  • Falcon

Well, as of these specs it really should have an amazing battery life comapred to Note3/S4, with a rather good performance overall, let's see what it will be like :)

  • Reply
  • 2014-01-22 21:51
  • fus}