Apple iPhone 17 Pro review

GSMArena Team, 30 September 2025.

Superb OLED display, as usual

The iPhone 17 Pro is equipped with a 6.3-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with ProMotion tech (Apple's branding for a variable 120Hz refresh rate). The panel isn't much different from the one on iPhone 16 Pro.

It's now protected by a new Ceramic Shield Glass 2 with anti-reflective properties - not only do we get sturdier glass, but the overall legibility under bright light has improved. Even though it's not a night-and-day difference, it's still readily observable when you have the new phone next to the old one.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro review

Apple advertises the display as capable of going as low as 1nit or as high as 1,000nits of maximum brightness manually, reaching up to 1,600nits in HDR playback, and up to 3,000nits of maximum automatic (outdoor) brightness, though it's not inconceivable that these values come with asterisks.

In our testing, we got 818nits when setting brightness manually and 1,012nits when exposing the phone to bright ambient light under our standardized testing conditions. We also measured a peak brightness of a 15% white patch (that is to say 15% of the screen is lit up) at 2,755nits, so the 3,000nits may very well be attainable for a smaller area. When we went from the small patch to 75% while keeping the bright ambient light, we saw the display maintain over 1,600 nits for a couple of seconds before going down to the 1,000-ish nits that it could sustain.

While the chart may look like the 17 Pro marks a downgrade, it's more of a change in approach than an actually dimmer screen. In summary, the display is very much capable of reaching very high brightness when the conditions call for it, it's just not as happy to comply with you if you want to get there on your own. That may be a bit of a departure from previous generations, when you could force the high brightness mode on a larger area under certain conditions. Regardless, sunlight legibility remains excellent, in part thanks to the new antireflective coating and in part to the adaptive brightness pumping up those nits as needed.

Max display brightness test

White test pattern, 75% fill (nits)

  • Manual mode
  • Auto mode
Pixel 10 Pro Pixel 10 Pro
1399
6.3" LTPO OLED 1280 x 2856 px
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
900
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
Oppo Find X8 Pro Oppo Find X8 Pro
897
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1264 x 2780 px
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra
846
6.73" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3200 px
iPhone 17 iPhone 17
824
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro
818
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
809
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px
iPhone 17 Pro Max iPhone 17 Pro Max
804
6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1320 x 2868 px
Sony Xperia 1 VII Sony Xperia 1 VII
795
6.5" LTPO AMOLED 1080 x 2340 px
Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra
784
6.9" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1440 x 3120 px
Galaxy S25 Galaxy S25
747
6.2" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1080 x 2340 px
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
619
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
Xiaomi 15 Xiaomi 15
549
6.36" LTPO OLED 1200 x 2670 px
Pixel 10 Pro Pixel 10 Pro
2351
6.3" LTPO OLED 1280 x 2856 px
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
1881
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
1764
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra
1599
6.73" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3200 px
Xiaomi 15 Xiaomi 15
1517
6.36" LTPO OLED 1200 x 2670 px
Sony Xperia 1 VII Sony Xperia 1 VII
1475
6.5" LTPO AMOLED 1080 x 2340 px
Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra
1417
6.9" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1440 x 3120 px
Galaxy S25 Galaxy S25
1395
6.2" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1080 x 2340 px
Oppo Find X8 Pro Oppo Find X8 Pro
1333
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1264 x 2780 px
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
1204
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px
iPhone 17 iPhone 17
1012
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro
1012
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
iPhone 17 Pro Max iPhone 17 Pro Max
1000
6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1320 x 2868 px

With ProMotion you get no manual control over the refresh rate other than the option to actually disable the high refresh rate from the Accessibility settings and cap things at 60Hz. Either way, the phone drops down to 1Hz for static images and always-on/standby modes and will choose the best refresh rate depending on the use case.

The iPhone 17 Pro supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision and apps will serve the appropriate streams as needed. Apple's HDR also works in windowed modes too - no need for the content to be displayed fullscreen for HDR to work.

True Tone adjustments for the color temperature depending on the light around the phone are also supported.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro review

As always, the iPhone 17 Pro deserves high praise for its haptics - the Taptic engine provides accurate and pleasant feedback.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro battery life

The entire iPhone 17 lineup received battery capacity bumps, and the 17 Pro is where the increase is the most notable - last year's model had a 3,582mAh battery, this one comes in at 3,998mAh on our version with a physical SIM slot (nearly 12% more) or even 4,252mAh on the eSIM only variant (19% more). It's a most welcome development, of course.

In our experience, the new model showed a meaningful increase in video playback runtime as well as in our gaming test, though we did observe a bit of a drop in web browsing, and the call time is in the so-so region. Still, the 17 Pro's overall Active Use Score is a very respectable 15:23h - far ahead of both the Pixel 10 Pro and the Galaxy S25.

Our new Active Use Score is an estimate of how long the battery will last if you use the device with a mix of all four test activities. You can adjust the calculation based on your usage pattern using the sliders below. You can read about our current battery life testing procedure here. For a comprehensive list of all tested devices so far, head this way.

Charging speed

The iPhone 17 series models are adopting the AVS charging standard - a fairly recent addition to the USB Power Delivery spec. Apple makes one adapter that explicitly adheres to that specific part of the protocol, the brand new and '40W Dynamic Power Adapter with 60W Max', which is only available in North America for the time being, so we couldn't get one. Google's pretty recent 'Pixel Flex Dual Port 67W USB-C Fast Charger' does support AVS so we tested with that one, as well as with a handful of other non-AVS (but properly PPS-capable) bricks.

Apple promises the 17 Pro should get to 50% in 20 minutes when using their new adapter, and it could be able to do it with other adapters too as per the official specs - "Up to 50% charge in 20 minutes with 40W adapter or higher (available separately) paired with USB-C charging cable", Apple says.

Charging the 17 Pro using the Pixel AVS adapter, we got to 100% in 1:18h and we were looking at 70% at the half-hour mark, and we got the exact same numbers with a Samsung 45W adapter, too. Our power meter showed momentary peaks up to 35W and sustained power at just under 30W in the earlier stages of the charging with the phone negotiating a 15V/3A 45W Power Delivery protocol with either charger. Other aftermarket chargers also happily negotiated the same protocol, so you can expect to max out the iPhone 17 Pro's charging capability with any reasonably modern 45W+ USB Power Delivery adapter.

Charging speed

  • in 15 min
  • in 30 min
  • Time to full charge (from 0%)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra
42%
5410 mAh 90W Xiaomi HyperCharge
Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra
41%
5000 mAh 45W PD
iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro
40%
3988 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 17 Pro Max iPhone 17 Pro Max
38%
4832 mAh 42W PD
iPhone 17 iPhone 17
36%
3692 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
33%
3582 mAh
Galaxy S25 Galaxy S25
28%
4000 mAh 25W
Pixel 10 Pro Pixel 10 Pro
26%
4870 mAh 30W Google PD
Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra
72%
5000 mAh 45W PD
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra
72%
5410 mAh 90W Xiaomi HyperCharge
iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro
70%
3988 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 17 Pro Max iPhone 17 Pro Max
65%
4832 mAh 42W PD
iPhone 17 iPhone 17
63%
3692 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
58%
3582 mAh
Galaxy S25 Galaxy S25
56%
4000 mAh 25W
Pixel 10 Pro Pixel 10 Pro
45%
4870 mAh 30W Google PD
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra
0:51h
5410 mAh 90W Xiaomi HyperCharge
Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra
0:59h
5000 mAh 45W PD
iPhone 17 Pro Max iPhone 17 Pro Max
1:12h
4832 mAh 42W PD
Galaxy S25 Galaxy S25
1:17h
4000 mAh 25W
iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro
1:18h
3988 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 17 iPhone 17
1:25h
3692 mAh 35W PD
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
1:38h
3582 mAh
Pixel 10 Pro Pixel 10 Pro
1:40h
4870 mAh 30W Google PD

There is also support for fast wireless charging for up to 25W via MagSafe and this year there's apparently third-party Qi2-compliant chargers that can also reach such values. We had one of those for testing and, just as on the 17 Pro Max, we were able to confirm the promised 50% top up from flat in 30 minutes, with the charger drawing 29W from the wall at most.

Naturally, there's a Battery Health option, which should help prolong the cell's lifespan - you can set the charge limit between 80% and 100%. Also, the Optimized Charging feature will learn your charging habits and minimize the time the battery spends at 100%. You can see the cycle count and battery health in the battery settings, too.

Speakers

The iPhone 17 Pro adopts a familiar hybrid stereo speaker setup with one bottom-firing unit and a top speaker directed towards the front that also works as an earpiece.

Bottom speaker - Apple iPhone 17 Pro review Top speaker/Earpiece - Apple iPhone 17 Pro review
Bottom speaker • Top speaker/Earpiece

The speakers scored an Average mark in our loudness test, a notch below the 16 Pro - we observed the same development on the Pro Max, where the downgrade is from 'Very Good' to 'Good'. Detailed teardowns have shown changed dimensions and reduced size of the drivers on this year's Pros so it makes sense for loudness to take a bit of hit.

Sound quality on the 17 Pro isn't half bad, however - not that you'd expect to see an iPhone with bad speakers (the Air doesn't count). In fact, it's almost like the 17 Pro is more composed and cleaner than the 16 Pro without sacrificing low-end response. Things are overall significantly better here than on the Pixel 10 Pro and the Galaxy S25 (though the S25 Ultra might have an edge over the 17 Pro).

Use the Playback controls to listen to the phone sample recordings (best use headphones). We measure the average loudness of the speakers in LUFS. A lower absolute value means a louder sound. A look at the frequency response chart will tell you how far off the ideal "0db" flat line is the reproduction of the bass, treble, and mid frequencies. You can add more phones to compare how they differ. The scores and ratings are not comparable with our older loudspeaker test. Learn more about how we test here.

Reader comments

  • Florinellu
  • 05 Nov 2025
  • srr

I got the 17 pro for 1 month already and i came from A52s. Performance is as expected, but the iOS is criminal, the most annoying one is the keyboard(no numbers row, no symbols and others) and the phone app which include the recent calls from all soc...

  • ulv
  • 27 Oct 2025
  • 3dk

Truly this design doesn't stand a chance against the Chinese makers.

  • Anonymous
  • 24 Oct 2025
  • y6W

>only 2 hours more SOT than S25 THIS IS FAR AHEAD FROM S25!!11!?1 lol what