Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 hands-on review

GSMArena team, 10 May 2018.

Software

The ZenFone Max Pro comes with Android 8.1 Oreo out of the box. Unlike previous ZenFone devices, this phone comes with a near stock build of Android, which is quite rare in this price range.

Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review
Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review Android 8.1 Oreo - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review
Android 8.1 Oreo

The software looks and feels pretty much like stock Android on Google Pixel or Android One devices for the most parts. ASUS does pre-load some third party applications but all of them can be entirely uninstalled from the device to get a minimalist setup.

Apart from those there are also some other minor additions made by ASUS, such as the aforementioned color temperature option under Display settings and a custom software update installer. There are some ZenMotion gestures that let you double tap or swipe on the screen to turn it on or off and draw letters on the lockscreen to launch apps. Then there are also apps from ASUS, such as Camera, Calculator, FM Radio, and Sound Recorder that are custom.

ASUS customizations - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review ASUS customizations - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review ASUS customizations - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review ASUS customizations - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 review
ASUS customizations

ASUS has also added a face unlock mode. In our testing, it didn't work very well in low light and only worked outdoors. ASUS did tell us that it is working on improving the feature in future updates.

Overall, though, this still feels overwhelmingly like a stock Android phone from Google and if someone were to cover all the badges it would be hard to guess this was made by ASUS.

Benchmark and performance

The ZenFone Max Pro is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 with a choice of 3GB or 4GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 32GB or 64GB of eMPC storage. That is largely on par with its rival, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. As such, we were expecting the performance to be on par, and unsurprisingly, it was.

While we will get to the benchmarks in a moment, and they are fairly impressive numbers, it's worth mentioning that the ZenFone Max Pro feels fast in everyday use as well. The problem is that the default animation speeds are just a tad bit too long but once we dug into the developer settings and reduced them from 1x to 0.5x, the phone felt extremely quick. One could go ahead and disable the animations entirely but then it feels a bit jarring so we'd recommend 0.5x.

Once that was done, the ZenFone Max Pro was a pleasure to use. Applications open and switch rapidly, scrolling was smooth and it was hard to tell at times this wasn't an expensive, flagship device. The combination of a powerful chipset and a lightweight UI is quite potent and makes using the phone a breeze.

Gaming performance is good too. However, there is one flaw in the OS; there is no way to set the scaling of applications in stock Android. This means there is no way to prevent applications from taking up the entire display. For regular apps, this isn't a problem; you want them to take up the entire display. However, most games are still being designed for 16:9 displays and end up losing chunks of the app area when they are made to go fullscreen on an 18:9 display. It's the same thing that happens when you make a 16:9 YouTube video fullscreen on an 18:9 display. This is something Google will have to build into the OS as realistically you can't expect that every single developer will update their apps for 18:9 displays. This is one thing custom ROMs have as they let you set the scaling factor for the apps from settings.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Oppo R11s
    5907
  • Nokia 7 plus
    5893
  • Oppo R15 Pro
    5809
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    4910
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro
    4696
  • Motorola Moto G5S Plus
    4331
  • Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
    4309
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    4225
  • Moto G5S Plus
    4193
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
    3509
  • LG Q6
    2244

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Nokia 7 plus
    1634
  • Oppo R11s
    1614
  • Oppo R15 Pro
    1612
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    1340
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro
    1327
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
    888
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    882
  • Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
    874
  • Motorola Moto G5S Plus
    848
  • Moto G5S Plus
    843
  • LG Q6
    652

AnTuTu 7

Higher is better

  • Oppo R15 Pro
    146526
  • Nokia 7 plus
    140820
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    115509
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro
    107737
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    90918

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Oppo R11s
    23
  • Nokia 7 plus
    23
  • Oppo R15 Pro
    22
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    16
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    14
  • Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
    9.9
  • Moto G5S Plus
    9.8
  • Motorola Moto G5S Plus
    9.8
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
    9
  • LG Q6
    5.8

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Oppo R11s
    23
  • Nokia 7 plus
    21
  • Oppo R15 Pro
    19
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    15
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    15
  • Moto G5S Plus
    10
  • Motorola Moto G5S Plus
    10
  • Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
    9.4
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
    8.9
  • LG Q6
    5.4

Basemark OS 2.0

Higher is better

  • Oppo R11s
    2499
  • Oppo R15 Pro
    2438
  • Nokia 7 plus
    2376
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro
    2030
  • ASUS ZenFone Max Pro
    1893
  • Nokia 6 (2018)
    1517
  • Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
    1226
  • Moto G5S Plus
    1176
  • Motorola Moto G5S Plus
    389
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
    379

Reader comments

  • Guru
  • 06 Dec 2023
  • rK@

Used it for 4 complete years before switching to a 5G phone. Still working fine as a backup phone. Its been 5.5 years now. Planning to import Zenfone 10.

  • Ans
  • 14 Jul 2023
  • rKC

i have been using this phone since last four years. Very durable... value for money

  • Handsome
  • 13 Dec 2022
  • sxr

No