Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G review: Value king

Value king

GSMArena team, 11 July 2014.

Synthetic benchmarks

Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G is powered by a Qualcomm MSM8928 Snapdragon 400 chipset with 1.6GHz quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU. The GPU is Adreno 305, while 2GB of RAM make sure that apps run without any hiccups.

GeekBench 3 and AnTuTu 4 are all-round benchmarks that test the entirety of the hardware build. In the first test - GeekBench 3 - the Ascend Mate2 scores a middling result.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    3178
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    3011
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    2842
  • LG G3
    2687
  • OnePlus One
    2663
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    2581
  • LG Nexus 5
    2453
  • HTC One
    1972
  • HTC One Max
    1899
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 S600
    1869
  • HTC One mini 2
    1526
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    1522
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    1359
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    1315
  • Sony Xperia M2
    1074
  • Motorola Moto E
    611

AnTuTu 4

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    38484
  • OnePlus One
    37469
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    36018
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    31717
  • LG G3
    30482
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 S600
    27613
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    26957
  • HTC One
    26389
  • HTC One Max
    26348
  • LG Nexus 5
    25097
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    21726
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    19896
  • HTC One mini 2
    17883
  • Sony Xperia M2
    17808
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    13776
  • Motorola Moto E
    12880

Next up we have GFXBench's 2.7 T-Rex and 3.0 Manhattan. The device's performance is hardly impressive, though it performed in line with similarly equipped offerings.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus One
    28.3
  • Oppo Find 7
    28
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    27.8
  • LG G3
    27.6
  • LG Nexus 5
    23
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 S600
    17.1
  • HTC One Max
    14
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    10.9
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    10.8
  • Sony Xperia M2
    5.9
  • HTC One mini 2
    5.8
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    5.8
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    5.8
  • Motorola Moto E
    4.5
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    4.4

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus One
    30
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    28.1
  • LG Nexus 5
    24
  • LG G3
    20.6
  • Oppo Find 7
    19.9
  • Sony Xperia M2
    15.4
  • Motorola Moto E
    11.2
  • HTC One mini 2
    11
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    10.9
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    10.8
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    10.6
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    10.6

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus One
    12.1
  • LG G3
    11.9
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    11.8
  • Oppo Find 7
    11.1
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    2
  • Sony Xperia M2
    1.9
  • HTC One mini 2
    1.7
  • Motorola Moto E
    1.4

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus One
    12.9
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    11.7
  • LG G3
    7.4
  • Sony Xperia M2
    6.9
  • Oppo Find 7
    6.7
  • Motorola Moto E
    4.9
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    4.3
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    4.1
  • HTC One mini 2
    3.8

BrowserMark 2.1 looks at HTML 5 performance, while Mozilla's Kraken 1.1 is JavaScript-centric. Once again, the handset showcased results which are in line with its price tag.

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    1452
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    1398
  • OnePlus One
    1339
  • LG Nexus 5
    1286
  • LG G3
    1254
  • HTC One mini 2
    945
  • Sony Xperia M2
    903
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    822
  • Motorola Moto E
    784
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    432

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    6043
  • Oppo Find 7
    6363
  • OnePlus One
    7008
  • LG Nexus 5
    7148
  • LG G3
    7610
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    12201
  • HTC One mini 2
    15684
  • Motorola Moto E
    17213
  • Sony Xperia M2
    18047
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    20366

Basemark X is designed to put the Adreno 305 GPU to the test. It is fair to say that the device did not set the benchmark on fire.

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    14968
  • OnePlus One
    13129
  • LG G3
    12436
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    1976
  • HTC One mini 2
    1650
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    1066

Basemark X (anti-cheat)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    15060
  • OnePlus One
    12890
  • LG G3
    12433
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    1971
  • HTC One mini 2
    1663

Basemark OS II tests the overall CPU performance. Again, we witness a score which is typical for a Snapdragon 400-equipped device.

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    1212
  • OnePlus One
    1196
  • LG G3
    1151
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    1082
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    542
  • HTC One mini 2
    517
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    492
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    434
  • Sony Xperia M2
    298
  • Motorola Moto E
    116

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    2606
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    2415
  • OnePlus One
    2213
  • LG G3
    2137
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    1781
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    1666
  • HTC One mini 2
    1304
  • Sony Xperia M2
    1164
  • Motorola Moto E
    1110

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    10391
  • OnePlus One
    10234
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    10063
  • LG G3
    9937
  • Gionee Elife S5.5
    8941
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    6662
  • HTC One mini 2
    5182
  • Sony Xperia M2
    4927
  • Motorola Moto E
    2637

Basemark OS II (anti-cheat)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    1174
  • OnePlus One
    1165
  • LG G3
    1132
  • HTC One mini 2
    511
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    498

Basemark OS II (single-core. anti-cheat)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    2583
  • OnePlus One
    2254
  • LG G3
    2176
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    1668
  • HTC One mini 2
    1357

Basemark OS II (multi-core. anti-cheat)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    10411
  • LG G3
    10097
  • OnePlus One
    9323
  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G
    6121
  • HTC One mini 2
    4889

Overall, the Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G didn't surprise us with its benchmark scores - it performed in line with similarly equipped offerings. It is worth noting that in real life, we didn't experience any performance hiccups with the handset - it ran every app we threw at it without breaking a sweat.

Reader comments

  • jlayneman
  • 07 Jan 2019
  • 8HY

Had this phone for four years, it has been great. Battery still last for days. Just ordered a Mate SE, hope it is as good a phone. May be the best phone I've ever owned.

  • AnonD-750714
  • 08 Apr 2018
  • kAW

I have had the phone for a couple years now and love it with its big screen but why would I ever buy another Huawei when they don't offer any updates for this phone? Makes me aprehensive on buying another Huawei which I probably will never do cuz of ...

  • AnonD-354514
  • 21 Jan 2015
  • rRS

How's does it stand up to LG's G3?