LG G4 preview: A second encounter
A second encounter
Performance
LG G4 is the first smartphone to come out with the Snapdragon 808 chip. Qualcomm announced the 808 revision side by side with the flagship 810 model, but it is only now that we are seeing it in action for the first time.
The Snapdragon 808 offers a hexa-core 64-bit processor with two Cortex-A57 and four Cortex-A53 cores, an Adreno 418 GPU and 3GB of RAM.
According to LG, the chipset is supposed to provide equally good performance as the Samsung's Exynos 7420 found in the Galaxy S6 - at least for the regular daily tasks.
We ran some benchmarks on a Korean preview unit. The smartphone runs Android 5.1 Lollipop and we'd reckon the software should be pretty much final since the phone is already on sale in its motherland.
LG G4 leaves a lotto be desired in the CPU-centric GeekBench 3 benchmark. The smartphone lags behind this year's crop of flagship smartphone
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
5215 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
5095 -
HTC One M9
3761 -
LG G Flex2
3604 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
3394 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
2532 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
2423
The trend continues in the AnTuTu 5 benchmark, which includes RAM and storage speed into the mix and is an indication of the overall performance of the device. LG G4 came close to HTC One M9, though it is far from the showing of Samsung Galaxy S6.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
70053 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
69396 -
HTC One M9
51427 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
49777 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
49273 -
LG G Flex2
47680 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
42301
BaseMark OS II is an overall compound benchmark, while BaseMark X focuses on the device's GPU. See the LG G4 results below.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
1826 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
1769 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
1672 -
LG G Flex2
1601 -
HTC One M9
1526 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
1332 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
1094
Basemark OS II (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
3497 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
3372 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
2574 -
LG G Flex2
2528 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
2423 -
HTC One M9
2401 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
1462
Basemark OS II (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
16986 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
16856 -
HTC One M9
10128 -
LG G Flex2
9758 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
9198 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
8441 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
5600
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
27169 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
27046 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
20043 -
HTC One M9
19848 -
LG G Flex2
19360 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
15090 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
12565
GFXBench puts the Adreno 418 GPU of LG G4 to the test. Again, the component doesn't quite match the performance of its competitors in the segment.
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
59 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
59 -
LG G Flex2
49 -
HTC One M9
49 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
40 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
35 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
27
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
HTC One M9
50 -
LG G Flex2
48 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
39 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
38 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
27 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
26 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
25
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
26 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
24 -
HTC One M9
23 -
LG G Flex2
22 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
18 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
15 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
13
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
HTC One M9
24 -
LG G Flex2
22 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
14 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
13 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
11 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
9.4
Update, May 14: We re-ran the Kraken benchmark and got a much better result, close to what the Galaxy S6 scores.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
3989 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
4154 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
4310 -
LG G Flex2
4621 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
5181 -
HTC One M9
5500 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
6360
We also tried BrorwserMark 2.1 again though it returned the slightly disappointing score from before. We'll investigate the performance further in the review.
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
2718 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
2702 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Lollipop
2232 -
LG G Flex2
2086 -
LG G4 F500L (S.Korea)
1939 -
HTC One M9
1681 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
1486
Overall, LG G4 didn't impress in our benchmark performance tests. We will revisit them when we get our hands on a retail unit of the device, but the early signs don't look promising.
It is important to note, that we didn't experience any hiccups while using the smartphone in real life - LG G4 felt snappy and ultra-responsive regardless of the task we threw at it. High-end gaming wasn't an issue either - LG G4 ran Dead Trigger 2 and Real Racing 3 without breaking a sweat.
Reader comments
- AnonD-460342
- 28 Oct 2015
- vV5
Have anyone owned LG G4 model 815? had any issues since the day you bought it? need to know ASAP. considering to buy one :)
- GlassICE
- 07 Jun 2015
- ID%
Nah I still prefer my Note 4 as a phone and tablet it's nothing fancy like that, it's just a waste of time but with new optional cover so, yeah it's nothing.
- Anonymous
- 04 Jun 2015
- RHT
fyi... it is not in the size of pixels also consider the size of the sensor.....