Meizu M5 Note review: One, Two, Three, Five!
One, Two, Three, Five!
Software
The Meizu M5 Note runs on Flyme 5.2.4.0 OS, which was built on top of an Android 6.0 Marshmallow core. Flyme, just like Apple's iOS, revolves around a single-tier UI - every app or widget resides directly on the homescreen without an additional app drawer that is typical for Android. All other system features can be configured through either the Settings menu or within the powerful Security app.
In China, many Meizu models come with what they call Yun OS, which is a forked version of Android with China-exclusive services to replace everything Google's. This is the reason why Meizu is not a registered Google Services partner. So Meizu can't ship even their international models with the Google APIs and apps, which are must-haves in the Western markets. Meizu has found a workaround to give you those crucial apps - the Hot Apps application on your homescreen is a mini appstore of sorts and it would instantly recommend you downloading something called Google installer, which would add everything you need to enjoy a normal Android experience and would give you access to the Google Play store.
The lockscreen* the homescreen • the notifications drawer • toggles • Security app
Flyme offers a variety of customization options, including themes. There are lots of useful system-wide gestures, which you can use even when the screen is turned off. You have advanced features such as a Do-Not-Disturb mode and scheduled power on and off among others.
Themes • themes • themes • scheduled power on/off • DND mode
Flyme 5 supports multi-view, which is managed via the task switching interface. The supported apps have a 'Multi' button, and you can activate a split-screen app right away. Unfortunately, the apps to support multi-view are only two - Video and Settings. Hopefully, this list will grow bigger with the upcoming firmware updates.
Task switcher • multi-view in action
Meizu provides all the necessary apps to get you started - gallery, multimedia players, calendar, weather, among other necessities, but you can find everything else in the Play Store.
Performance
Meizu M5 Note is powered by the popular, but dated and honestly, pretty mediocre MediaTek Helio P10 chipset. It packs an octa-core processor with 4x Cortex-A53 at 1.8GHz and 4x A53 at 1.0GHz. The GPU is quite uninspiring as well - the Mali-T860 MP2 (read dual-core), but on a positive note there is either 3GB or 4GB of RAM for heavy multi-tasking.
The same Helio P10 chip is the one used in the Meizu m3 note, while the older m1 metal had a more powerful Helio X10. We can't justify using the P10 in a recent phone such as the M5 Note, but we guess it shares its internals with the m3 note for practicality.
The processor performance is OK, when Android operations are concerned, but it trails behind the competition once it comes to heavy duty tasks, which require all eight cores.
GeekBench 3 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
1596 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
1543 -
Meizu m1 metal
883 -
Meizu m3 note
807 -
Meizu M5 Note
798 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
745
GeekBench 3 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
5166 -
Meizu m1 metal
4825 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
4537 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
4140 -
Meizu m1 note
3988 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
3695 -
Meizu m3 note
3028 -
Meizu M5 Note
2802 -
Meizu m2 note
2649
The graphic performance hasn't changed a bit since the m1 note and m3 note, though the newer GPU supports the latest OpenGL ES 3.1. The m1 metal, which was released two years ago, has a better performing GPU (PowerVR G6200) than the M5 Note.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
15 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
15 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
14 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
8.5 -
Meizu m1 metal
8.4 -
Meizu m1 note
5.8 -
Meizu M5 Note
5.5 -
Meizu m3 note
5.4 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
4.9 -
Meizu m2 note
2.3
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
15 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
15 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
14 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
9.5 -
Meizu m1 metal
8 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
7.9 -
Meizu m1 note
5.7 -
Meizu M5 Note
5.5 -
Meizu m3 note
5.4 -
Meizu m2 note
2.3
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
9.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
9.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
9 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
7.2 -
Meizu m1 metal
4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
4 -
Meizu M5 Note
3.6 -
Meizu m3 note
2.5 -
Meizu m2 note
1.5
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
9.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
9.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
9 -
Meizu m1 metal
3.9 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
3.9 -
Meizu M5 Note
3.6 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
3.2 -
Meizu m3 note
2.5 -
Meizu m2 note
1.9
GFX 3.1 Car scene (offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
5.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
5.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
5.3 -
Meizu M5 Note
1.9
GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
5.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
5.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
5.4 -
Meizu M5 Note
1.9
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
14717 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
13666 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
12190 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
8540 -
Meizu m1 metal
8526 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
5383 -
Meizu M5 Note
5276 -
Meizu m1 note
4617 -
Meizu m3 note
4567 -
Meizu m2 note
3946
Even the compound benchmarks such as AnTuTu and BaseMark OS II can't put some positive twist on the M5 Note as its performance is yet again close or even behind its predecessors.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Meizu m1 metal
49508 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
47816 -
Meizu m3 note
41838 -
Meizu M5 Note
39762 -
Meizu m1 note
39224 -
Meizu m2 note
32054
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
85162 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
77442 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
76186 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
49094 -
Meizu M5 Note
47806 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
45474 -
Meizu m3 note
44898
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
1914 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
1648 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
999 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
956 -
Meizu M5 Note
944 -
Meizu m1 metal
943 -
Meizu m3 note
930 -
Meizu m2 note
794 -
Meizu m1 note
715
The benchmark tests show the M5 Note outs average scores across the board and will provide an OK for a mid-ranger experience, though we've expected more. The Note's performance hasn't gone far since the series' launch and we just can't understand the lack of a meaningful upgrade in this department.
Very good audio quality
The Meizu M5 Note impressed us with its loudness in both testing scenarios - its very high volume levels are rather hard to find in this price range and suggest a nicely powerful amplifier.
The clarity of its output was another nice surprise - it was perfect with an active external amplifier and very good when headphones came into play. The stereo crosstalk, IMD and THD were the only affected readings but even they were still very good.
And here go the results.
Test | Frequency response | Noise level | Dynamic range | THD | IMD + Noise | Stereo crosstalk |
+0.02, -0.11 | -93.8 | 93.9 | 0.0042 | 0.0080 | -94.1 | |
+0.12, -0.06 | -93.1 | 93.2 | 0.192 | 0.126 | -61.4 | |
+0.47, -0.06 | -87.9 | 88.1 | 0.0052 | 0.014 | -86.4 | |
+0.28, -0.49 | -86.9 | 87.1 | 0.0037 | 0.108 | -55.8 | |
+0.02, -0.32 | -93.1 | 93.3 | 0.0039 | 0.0032 | -90.2 | |
+0.29, -0.09 | -88.3 | 87.7 | 0.015 | 0.232 | -60.2 | |
+0.04, -0.02 | -93.0 | 93.1 | 0.0018 | 0.0085 | -93.8 | |
+0.05, -0.02 | -92.7 | 92.8 | 0.0023 | 0.054 | -52.4 | |
+0.03, -0.30 | -86.6 | 83.6 | 0.0017 | 0.049 | -91.1 | |
+0.06, -0.03 | -92.4 | 92.4 | 0.0018 | 0.021 | -88.2 |
Meizu M5 Note frequency response
You can learn more about the tested parameters and the whole testing process here.
Reader comments
- Ahdi
- 23 Aug 2020
- xhm
im gonna make it simple price vs value this phone one of the worst or i just being scam by darn sales girl never trust this brand anymore
- Steve
- 28 Oct 2019
- NY$
no clear contacts on my phone
- AnonD-82756
- 11 Jul 2019
- nIY
I still have a M5 note and it still performs as it did the day I got it, only thing is in the review it says all metal well mine is or feels definitely like a plastic back.