Meizu Pro 7 Plus review: Two-Face
Two-Face
Synthetic and real-life performance
Meizu Pro 7 Plus is the first smartphone to utilize the latest Helio X30 chip by MediaTek. It has a powerful deca-core processor and PowerVR graphics. Meizu has added 6 gigabytes of RAM, more than enough for smooth multi-tasking.
The 10-core processor has two powerful Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.6GHz, four energy-efficient A53 cores running at 2.2GHz, and four super lightweight A35 ones ticking at 1.9GHz. The GPU in charge of graphics is PowerVR 7XTP series - not exactly new as Apple had a similar one in the iPhone 6s two years ago.
Traditionally we start our benchmarking routine with some Geekbench tests on the processor, but our unit is running on a pre-release Flyme version, and it failed to run the app.
Other than Geekbench, all other tests were able to complete their routines. The GPU chosen for the Helio X30 isn't of the latest generations and while it was once a flagship-grade, it's now more of a mid-range performer. Considering the QHD screen on the Pro 7 Plus we weren't sure what to expect, but luckily there are no reasons for worries.
The offscreen GFX tests show the PowerVR 7XTP GPU is noticeably weaker than the current Adreno 540 by Qualcomm, but very close to its previous Adreno 530 model available in the Snapdragon 820 generation and on par with the Mali-T880MP10 found in the Meizu Pro 6 Plus.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 5
60 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
59 -
Nokia 8
57 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
50 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
50 -
OnePlus 3T
49 -
Sony Xperia XZs
42 -
LG G6
41 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
40 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
37 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
34 -
Huawei P10 Plus
28 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
28 -
Meizu Pro 5
25 -
Meizu Pro 6
18 -
Huawei P9 Plus
18
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 5
41 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
41 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
39 -
Nokia 8
39 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
36 -
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Sony Xperia XZs
32 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
29 -
LG G6
26 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
25 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
22 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
22 -
Huawei P10 Plus
19 -
Meizu Pro 5
14 -
Meizu Pro 6
11 -
Huawei P9 Plus
10
There are apps that will run on the native 1440p resolution, so we also ran the onscreen GFX benchmarks. The Pro 7 Plus GPU does a decent job, though the current top-of-the-line crop offers twice the performance, so not really spectacular.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 5
56 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 -
OnePlus 3T
48 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 -
Sony Xperia XZs
40 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
36 -
Nokia 8
33 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
27 -
Meizu Pro 5
25 -
LG G6
24 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
23 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
23 -
Huawei P10 Plus
19 -
Huawei P9 Plus
19 -
Meizu Pro 6
18 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
18
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
41 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
41 -
OnePlus 5
40 -
Sony Xperia XZs
34 -
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 -
Nokia 8
18 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
15 -
Meizu Pro 5
14 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
13 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
13 -
Huawei P10 Plus
12 -
LG G6
12 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
12 -
Meizu Pro 6
11 -
Huawei P9 Plus
11
We can draw the same conclusions from the compound GPU tests by BaseMark - the Pro 7 Plus has a capable GPU, but far from the best on the market.
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S8
42370 -
OnePlus 5
38844 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
38541 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
38507 -
Nokia 8
37593 -
OnePlus 3T
36958 -
Sony Xperia XZs
33815 -
Huawei P10 Plus
30602 -
LG G6
30507 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
28480 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
27600 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
23513 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
22472 -
Meizu Pro 5
20038 -
Meizu Pro 6
15209 -
Huawei P9 Plus
15058
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S8
1189 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
861 -
Nokia 8
855 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
842 -
OnePlus 5
796 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
733 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
642 -
OnePlus 3T
641 -
Sony Xperia XZs
623 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
616 -
LG G6
541 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
517 -
Meizu Pro 5
409 -
Huawei P9 Plus
214
While we couldn't run the CPU tests, the compound apps AnTuTu and BaseMark OS II 2.0 give us a pretty good idea of what to expect. The Meizu Pro 7 Plus was closer to the top here, suggesting that its processor is much to the top dogs than its GPU.
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 5
180331 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
177326 -
Nokia 8
175872 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
174435 -
OnePlus 3T
165097 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
144223 -
LG G6
143639 -
Sony Xperia XZs
133574 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
129229 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
128719 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
128498 -
Huawei P10 Plus
126252 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
113397 -
Meizu Pro 6
99195 -
Huawei P9 Plus
97392 -
Meizu Pro 5
67531
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 5
3601 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
3547 -
Nokia 8
3503 -
Samsung Galaxy S8
3376 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3174 -
Huawei P10 Plus
2940 -
OnePlus 3T
2678 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
2496 -
Sony Xperia XZs
2386 -
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
2380 -
LG G6
2126 -
Huawei P9 Plus
2099 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (E8890)
2050 -
Meizu Pro 6
1919 -
Meizu Pro 5
1837
The Meizu Pro 7 Plus isn't topping any benchmark charts, but this doesn't mean it doesn't offer flagship-grade performance in daily usage. Its 10-core processor offers plenty of future-proofing and being built on the 10nm it's very energy-efficient, so the phone runs pretty cool even when stress-tested.
The GPU seemed like the weak spot of the Meizu Pro 7 Plus and its Helio X30 chip, but things aren't as bad as the numbers alone might have you believe. It may not have the same theoretical performance as the current competition, but it's capable of handling any demanding 3D game or high-res movie, hassle-free, no matter the resolution. It may not be as future-proof as the CPU, but it will be good enough for at least a couple more years.
Reader comments
- Albert
- 23 May 2018
- fCT
Face lock is yessssss
- Anonymous
- 10 Oct 2017
- dWg
Where are the cpu tests?
- Anonymous
- 03 Oct 2017
- I9H
It seem that only the Pro 7, not the Plus has Band 20 support, is that correct?