Moto G5S Plus hands-on review: Special first look
Special first look
Software
The Moto G5S Plus runs on Android 7.1.1 Nougat. The software experience here is similar to what we saw back with the G5 Plus, save for a new launcher and icon pack, first seen on the Z2 Play.
If you have used any of the recent Motorola phones, you will already be aware of what to expect with the G5S Plus. The design is pretty much identical to stock Android.
Motorola's customizations are limited to additional apps and services, and most of it is useful and worth having. This includes features like Moto Actions, which is a series of gestures that range from shaking the phone to turn on the flashlight or twisting it to turn on the camera, and even using the fingerprint sensor as a gesture pad to navigate the phone instead of using on-screen controls.
Moto Display lights up the display to show the clock and pending notification whenever you pick up the phone or there is a new notification.
Not all the additions are useful or necessary. Over the years Motorola has slowly been increasing the apps that come bundled in with the device. We have to deal with the usual assortment of Google Docs apps (Docs, Sheets, Slides) that come pre-installed and cannot be removed.
Our unit also came with LinkedIn and Outlook pre-installed and again, could not be removed. We wish Motorola would cut back on some of these as they are all available for free on the Play Store and there is absolutely no value in forcing these on the users who could just as well get them themselves.
Overall, though, the software experience on the G5S Plus remains up to Motorola's usually high standards. The phone is also expected to get the Android Oreo update before the end of the year.
Battery life
The G5S Plus has a 3000mAh non-removable battery. In our usage, the battery life was less than ideal. The phone lasted us for about 4-5 hours of screen-on time, which might seem good but it is lower than what other phones in this class are capable of.
The phone supports TurboPower charging, which is essentially Qualcomm QuickCharge. The Motorola charger we got in the box promptly died after we plugged in for the first time. We then had to rely on another QuickCharge 3.0 charger of similar rating from then onward. This got us charge times of about two hours, which isn't terribly fast for a phone with fast charging and not a particularly large battery. The phone also gets quite hot, which is common for QuickCharge devices and one of the reasons we like OnePlus Dash charging better.
Performance
Running essentially the same hardware as the Moto G5 Plus, the G5S Plus doesn't feel any different. The performance, in general, is good, and we were happy with the way the phone performed out of the box and with a handful of apps installed. How it will perform over time remains to be seen, but the 4GB of RAM ensured we didn't have any issues with multitasking or web browsing.
Still, we would have liked the Special Edition model to have a slight bump in performance. AR performance is still lacking, and this can be seen while using face filters in Snapchat or Instagram, which struggle with the added complexity of rendering real time 3D objects over the camera image.
Gaming performance is also average. Again, we would have loved to see some improvement here, especially for the heavy 3D games but the phone does run most other games fine.
GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Moto G5 Plus
4255 -
Moto G5S Plus
4193 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
3779 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
3509 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
2841 -
Oppo F3
2798 -
Moto G5
2580
GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
888 -
Moto G5 Plus
847 -
Moto G5S Plus
843 -
Oppo F3
764 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
734 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
665 -
Moto G5
618
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
Moto G5S Plus
64554 -
Moto G5 Plus
63390 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
63358 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
61616 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
57996 -
Huawei Honor 6X
57012 -
Oppo F3
53008 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
47495 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
46822 -
Moto G5
43755
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Moto G5S Plus
10 -
Moto G5 Plus
9.7 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
9.7 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
8.9 -
Huawei Honor 6X
7.9 -
Moto G5
7.1 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
7 -
Oppo F3
6.8 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
5.1
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Moto G5S Plus
6.8 -
Moto G5 Plus
6.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
6.2 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
6.2 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 -
Moto G5
4.6 -
Huawei Honor 6X
4.6 -
Oppo F3
4.5 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
4.5 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
3.3
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Moto G5S Plus
10488 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
10446 -
Moto G5 Plus
10406 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
9034 -
Huawei Honor 6X
8458 -
Nokia 6 (Global version)
7516 -
Moto G5
7475 -
Oppo F3
6148 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
5489
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Huawei Honor 6X
1309 -
Moto G5S Plus
1176 -
Moto G5 Plus
1089 -
Oppo F3
1085 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
1050 -
Moto G5
795 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max
379 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
349
Reader comments
- Nandan singh
- 10 Jan 2018
- rAh
Yes
- Anonymous
- 17 Dec 2017
- GRZ
Mi A1 is lot better than this crap. And it's cheaper too
- AnonD-720647
- 05 Dec 2017
- IL}
Did you purchase this device? How is it? https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2017/11/27/device-ai-acceleration-debuts-motorola-smartphones-snapdragon-neural-processing?cmpid=fofyus1728