Moto Z2 Force review: Nothing less, nothing more

Nothing less, nothing more

GSMArena team, 12 August 2017.

Synthetic benchmarks

Like the majority of 2017's flagship smartphones, the Z2 Force packs a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 CPU. Where the Snapdragon 820 used a souped-up quad-core CPU (two performance cores + two efficiency cores), the SD 835 uses four performance cores clocked at up to 2.45GHz and four efficiency cores running up to 1.9GHz.

However, what attributes to the faster CPU's improved power efficiency over the Snapdragon 820/821 is the 835's 10nm process. It contains a more powerful CPU in a smaller footprint, resulting in improved battery life.

Lenovo Moto Z2 Force review

Snapdragons aside, the Moto Z2 Force posted quite well across the board. We've got a decent variety of CPUs in the batch: The Exynos 8895 represented by none other than the Galaxy S8, as well as the Snapdragon 835 version of the S8+ (along with the HTC U11). We're also looking at the Kirin 960 in the Huawei P10 Plus, and, of course, the Apple iPhone 7 Plus' A10 Fusion chip.

Motorola's software has always been well optimized and the Moto Z2 Force is no exception. In GeekBench, the scores are well within other smartphones with the same processor. In GeekBench 4 (not 4.1) results, you can see the clear distinction between the Snapdragon 820/821 and Snapdragon 835. You can also spot the iPhone 7 Plus' A10 Fusion in the single-core score, whose Twister cores remain champs on their own.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    6656
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    6629
  • OnePlus 5
    6604
  • HTC U11
    6393
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    6301

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    1991
  • OnePlus 5
    1932
  • HTC U11
    1919
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    1915
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    1832

GeekBench 4 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 5
    6404
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    6278
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    6175
  • HTC U11
    6125
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    6106
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    5821
  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    5664
  • OnePlus 3T
    4364
  • Google Pixel XL
    4152
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    4130
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    4128

GeekBench 4 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    3473
  • OnePlus 5
    2031
  • HTC U11
    1993
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    1986
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    1945
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    1937
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    1915
  • OnePlus 3T
    1890
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    1696
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    1694
  • Google Pixel XL
    1507

In overall performance, the Z2 Force took the lead only behind the iPhone 7 Plus. The OnePlus 5 trails close behind and the OnePlus 3T scored atop the other competitors, even besting both versions of the Galaxy S8. The Moto Z Droid is just ahead of the OnePlus 3T with the Google Pixel scoring dead last here.

Basemark OS 2.0

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    3796
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    3609
  • OnePlus 5
    3601
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    3376
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    3319
  • HTC U11
    2970
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    2940
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    2690
  • OnePlus 3T
    2678
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    2352
  • Google Pixel XL
    2281

AnTuTu 6 shows a pretty nice curve with the scored of devices. The OnePlus 5 likely dominated the charts thanks to its whopping 8GB of RAM. Otherwise, the U11 trails just behind with the iPhone 7 Plus unable to break 175k. The Huawei P10 Plus scored last in this round.

AnTuTu 6

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 5
    180331
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    178674
  • HTC U11
    177343
  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    174987
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    174435
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    168133
  • OnePlus 3T
    165097
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    151619
  • Google Pixel XL
    141186
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    132849
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    126252

Now we arrive at gaming performance. GFXBench puts the devices through graphic-intensive tests to see where the phones top off in the number of frames per second the phone can crank out.

The Moto Z2 Force topped out on all offscreen tests, which objectively puts the Moto Z2 Force at the top of the other smartphones. That's only if you compare apple to apples, though. Since phone displays come with varying resolutions, the one with a higher resolution would require working with more pixels, thus scoring a lower frames-per-second.

The Exynos Galaxy S8 was able to beat the Z2 Force in only one test by one point: 3.1 Manhattan on-screen test. Considering the S8 has a resolution only slightly higher than QHD (because of pixels added in the 2:1 display), the Exynos 8895 is a gamers dream. Otherwise, the phones that scored higher all did so because they only render at 1080p resolution.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    61
  • OnePlus 5
    60
  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    60
  • HTC U11
    60
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    57
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    50
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    49
  • OnePlus 3T
    49
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    49
  • Google Pixel XL
    47
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    28

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 5
    56
  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    56
  • OnePlus 3T
    48
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    40
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    36
  • HTC U11
    35
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    34
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    31
  • Google Pixel XL
    30
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    29
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    19

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    42
  • OnePlus 5
    41
  • HTC U11
    41
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    39
  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    39
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    36
  • OnePlus 3T
    33
  • Google Pixel XL
    32
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    32
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    32
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    19

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    42
  • OnePlus 5
    40
  • OnePlus 3T
    33
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    23
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    22
  • HTC U11
    19
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    18
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    18
  • Google Pixel XL
    17
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    16
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    12

GFX 3.1 Car scene (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    25
  • OnePlus 5
    24
  • HTC U11
    24
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    23
  • OnePlus 3T
    20
  • Google Pixel XL
    19
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    19
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    18
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    12

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 5
    24
  • OnePlus 3T
    20
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    13
  • HTC U11
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    12
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    12
  • Google Pixel XL
    11
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    10
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    9

Finally, we make it to Basemark X. Like Antutu 6, we can see somewhat of a curve here as well. The Galaxy S8 (Exynos) is the clear first of the pack. Just below it is the OnePlus 5, and then comes the Moto Z2 Force. After seeing these comparisons, we can say that the top three Android performers are the Exynos-flavored Galaxy S8, OnePlus 5, and the Moto Z2 Force.

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S8
    42370
  • OnePlus 5
    38844
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    38615
  • HTC U11
    38399
  • OnePlus 3T
    36958
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    36322
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    34951
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (S820)
    32160
  • Google Pixel XL
    30861
  • Huawei P10 Plus
    30602

The Moto Z2 Force is no slouch in performance. We're also glad that the Snapdragon 835 isn't as prone to heat as the Snapdragon 820 was. The Snapdragon 835 is more efficient during use thanks to its 10nm process. By contrast, the Snapdragon 820 used a 14nm one.

The phone never hesitates with tasks, and Moto's lightly-flavored Android skin has worked in its favor ever since the days of the original Moto X.

Reader comments

  • Anonymous
  • 22 Feb 2019
  • ITL

Very nice phone 6 to 7 hours on wifi using continusely

  • Ferit
  • 29 Dec 2018
  • knc

all those nice details the B&W sensor captures don't affect the color picture though, right? The color picture is only as detailed as the color sensor captures.

  • Anonymous
  • 09 Oct 2018
  • gMy

Hey can you tell that now in India in festival offers, I am getting this phone for $250/ . It's a really good deal or I choose to go with new device? Please tell