Motorola Droid Turbo review: Power robot
Power robot
Performance
Built upon a Snapdragon 805 chipset with a quad-core 2.7GHz Krait 450, 3GB of RAM and the Adreno 420 graphics processing unit the Motorola Droid Turbo should be a true benchmarks champ. We've found that a mostly pure Android helps a lot too.
And indeed it is - the Droid Turbo utilizes its hardware very well and managed to top immediate competitors in GeekBench 3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4, for example, has the same chipset and screen resolution, OS version too. The Motorola also managed to outdo the 64-bit Apple iPhone 6.
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Motorola Droid Turbo
3080 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
3011 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
2984 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
2925 -
Apple iPhone 6
2924 -
LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
2563 -
HTC One (M8)
2367
The Droid Turbo easily topped our AnTuTu 5 comparison as well. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 stays a close second to Motorola's latest flagship. Snapdragon 801 smartphones are left in the dust of the newer chip's performance.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Motorola Droid Turbo
47067 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
46824 -
HTC One (M8)
44020 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
43676 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
43164 -
LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
39905
Basemark X and Basemark OS II scores by Motorola Droid Turbo came out impressive as well. See them below.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
Motorola Droid Turbo
1345 -
Apple iPhone 6
1252 -
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
1222 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
1181 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
1176
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Motorola Droid Turbo
18971 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
18684 -
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
18297 -
Apple iPhone 6
17054 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
11855
As expected, the device’s Adreno 420 GPU does a good job in handling the multitude of pixels. The newcomer performed in line with the similarly equipped Samsung Galaxy Note 4.
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
44.6 -
Apple iPhone 6
42.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
41.7 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
40.9 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
26.6
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6
51 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
28.3 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
26.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
26.4
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
18.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
18.5 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
18 -
Apple iPhone 6
17.7 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
11.4
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6
29.2 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
11.9 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
11.4 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
11.2
Thanks to Samsung's typical optimizations to the web browser it managed to grab a win from the Droid Turbo, which uses Google's mobile Chrome browser that typically doesn't benchmark as well.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
5351 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
5763 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
6043 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
6209 -
LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
6987 -
HTC One (M8)
10296
Browsermark 2.1 is another benchmark, where the Droid Turbo falls behind the competition. Google Chrome is not as optimized as some of its competitors.
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
3389 -
Apple iPhone 6
3153 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
2208 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
1600 -
Motorola Droid Turbo
1487 -
Meizu MX4
720
Overall, Motorola Droid Turbo did a stellar job in our benchmark tests. The handset packs plenty of oomph and will handle anything you throw at it without breaking a sweat.
Reader comments
- Jim
- 09 May 2022
- y2e
Features were flagship when new but not now. Add to that the purposeful slowing down to push users into buying a new one. But as I age I am learning to live without so I am keeping it for now. I think I'll look for a way to be free from Googl...
- Mike
- 29 Jul 2021
- 8sy
using it as my 2nd phone since 2015. all apps and games still working on rooted android 4.4.4, no need to update for slower speed and faster battery drain. good phone!
- Muhammad Hamza Qasim
- 17 Jun 2021
- 6Px
Best phone because turbo is installed in it. Keep it up Moto