Motorola KRZR K1
- D
- Dan
- 2W5
- 04 Aug 2006
Hey.... can anyone tell me the advantages of a LINUX interface? As in the Motorola JUIX interface? Is it better than symbian? Oh and does anyone know how its vid recording should be?
- N
- Nigredo
- SY5
- 04 Aug 2006
For the previous post:
KRZR = Crazer
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4H7
- 03 Aug 2006
seems as though motorola is trying to repackage the same quality in a different package. i wonder if they did anything to prevent dropped calls. any1 know how to pronounce the name of the thing?
- S
- Sharif Haque Sumit
- PWx
- 03 Aug 2006
Nice,pretty looking phone.Display infomations mentioned here is wrong. Actual Dispaly for K1,GSM, is TFT 262k Colors, not 65k. CDMA version will be 65k.Surely this phone will be a success like razr v3.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Pv9
- 02 Aug 2006
its a pretty phone but its a year late. its not impressive. for the price its going to come, you can get a QVGA screen a radio and a 3mpx camera.
- d
- defender
- jnZ
- 31 Jul 2006
I was attending a meeting for a local provider and there was a motorola rep that was there and he had one of these!!!! Beautiful phone and it feels sooo good when you're using it, but he wouldn't let me take pictures. All in all I can't wait!. He said something about Moto trying to launch it in October
- l
- love
- j@J
- 31 Jul 2006
you would think moto would be smart enough for them to make the boot smaller but apparently not this is why the phone is so butt ugly
- Z
- Zulo
- jnZ
- 30 Jul 2006
When this phone becomes I will buy one for my girl friend. It's a nice phone.
- N
- Neel
- ije
- 29 Jul 2006
@www.benink.uni.cc . ya its really useless to have e qvga screen as main screen. But it really need a bigger outer screen. the qvga scren of rokr e2 is many times better then the 176*220 screen in every aspect from quality of text to picture. If MOTO can fit QVGA in a phone smaller in size then why can't it fit in in a flip phone? They r joking? If i m not mistaking it is going to b a costly phone. Then is it really a sin to expect a QVGA screen. They made a super looking phone. Let me imagine it has super features then Why it has 176*220 screen not QVGA which is better in all aspect. ANd evey single person will agree that Quality of QVGA is far better then 176*220 screen. And it is expected then MOTO will fit its sexy beauties with it.
- w
- www.benink.uni.cc
- 4TC
- 29 Jul 2006
Personally, I think thats the most drop dead, gorgeous phone ever. It keeps what works from the rar style but makes it even more sleek. Plus the features arent half that bad for such a tiny phone. My ony omplaint is with the external screen, it needs a border like on prevous models. Also, why does everyone care so much about it not having a QVGA screen? What are you going to do on this phone that you need a higher resolution screen for?
- ?
- Anonymous
- PFM
- 29 Jul 2006
It looks good. But it can't do other applications like mobile banking. Motorola uses their own digital certs. which is not recognise by most banks
- ?
- Anonymous
- jR0
- 28 Jul 2006
available at: www.puremobile.ca
- A
- Angelus
- PhY
- 28 Jul 2006
The same design again... I can't help it.
Motorola is now on a phase of despair...
Lol
- N
- Neel
- 2SU
- 28 Jul 2006
will have no complains about software of MOTO if they use there new UI (JUIX) that of ROKR E2. Its the best for non smart phone. But if the don't use that then they r stupid guys. And what r MOTO's problem guys? Why it is using 176*220 screen when it used QVGA in ROKR E2? It really sucks man to have such a cool phone with so much volume & just 176*220 screen. And what r there designers doing? They r after miniaturing phones without giving a proper features.I will go for a phone with normal size to some more bulky if it has features & specification 100 out of 100 then for a slim fone with no features. This is some thing really stupid. Why MOTO is paying there desinger & people of R&D section money just for assembling old hardware in new phones. The screen of new phone has 176*220 (65K) colour. Same 1.3 or 2MP Matrix With out optical zoom. Some of them don't have a flash. Just 20 MB onboard memory. If they r not using there R&D section wel then MOTO will b a history in future. I m a fan of Moto. I used some phones of MOTO but now they have starting acting like stupid. Come on guys take some real steps to produce some good phones.
- K
- Kal
- Ybt
- 28 Jul 2006
oh here is an example...
"Pirates of carabian-2"..a much hyped movie that made a record amount of money on release..coz every tom-dick and harry went to watch it. was that movie so GREAT. answer is --------------NOO.
Its all about marketing. I would repeat the same line again.
When you see it, you love it the most.
When you own it, you hate it the most.
Thats what moto is.
- p
- plp
- 4tj
- 28 Jul 2006
so if its so boring why does every body has one ????????????
- K
- Kal
- jc}
- 28 Jul 2006
How could a 176x220 65k color screen be "High resolution" as the other posting says??
It has a glossy surface and that makes it a Finger print/dust catcher.
They have sold 50 million V3, true..any idea how many of them being send back to service center? I believe they have made a record there as well.LOL
Frankly that "waoo" factor doesn't work for rarz type designs any more.
- r
- rac
- PdG
- 27 Jul 2006
soooo boring watz up with them...its the same concept...sucks
- K
- KICH
- Rn@
- 27 Jul 2006
From the companies stand point they have captured a major segment of the market with
little R&D.
Yes the point is to make profit and that is thanks to good marketing not good products.
50 million sold, so what, guess you think cocaine is also a great product also cause its profits are in the billions per year...
- ?
- Anonymous
- ygq
- 27 Jul 2006
This phone's beauty cannot be captured in photograph. You have to see it to believe it. The reflective surface is glassy and the phone do not at all look like the RAZR. It has got a very high resolution screen and the Motorola UI has been completely revamped. This phone is a joy just to behold!