Samsung Galaxy A3 and A5 prices in Netherlands, to arrive Q1 2015

02 December, 2014
The Galaxy A5 is already available in China and the A3 is expected by the end of the year.

Sort by:

  • D
  • Darius
  • Mf5
  • 17 Dec 2014

So $380 translates to €410, that's reasonable .... not.

    • d
    • dsfds
    • 0Tv
    • 04 Dec 2014

    lets copy apple !!!!!!!
    we need it because we suck at design

      • D
      • AnonD-226352
      • rJ9
      • 04 Dec 2014

      noname, 03 Dec 2014what a nonsence. it has i9301 spec, and twice bigger price?... moreReally, Samsung making fool to mobile market by launching every month a new covered plastic phone with old phone specs in high price tag.

        • D
        • AnonD-243873
        • Xu@
        • 03 Dec 2014

        Samsung come on price it 40000 rs in India we need competition in terms of high pricing with less specs with apple.Now Samsung you rule India charge a fortune.Your brand will become apple.Let's see whether you start become premium brand by charging high money for less specs offered.come on am waiting .

          • D
          • AnonD-226352
          • U{d
          • 03 Dec 2014

          I think people of Netherlands are very intelligent and aware in their life so they don't buy this bad stuff in low specs with high price

            • n
            • noname
            • 0FS
            • 03 Dec 2014

            what a nonsence. it has i9301 spec, and twice bigger price? come on samsung give us something real new, not same spec every year with different cover.

              • J
              • Jarret
              • 25G
              • 03 Dec 2014

              A good move from Samsung to regain the world's top smartphone marketing.

                • T
                • TP
                • ub6
                • 03 Dec 2014

                Great move. These models may give a come back to samsung

                  • d
                  • django
                  • uCs
                  • 03 Dec 2014

                  mixa, 03 Dec 2014Too expensive for phones made by Samsung. If prices were ab... moreagreed..

                  eventually sammy does reduce the price within 3 months

                    • m
                    • mixa
                    • pwT
                    • 03 Dec 2014

                    Too expensive for phones made by Samsung. If prices were about 35-40% lower, then it would make sense.

                      • D
                      • AnonD-213908
                      • YUT
                      • 03 Dec 2014

                      Knowing Samsung, those insane prices are there to recoup back their equally insane marketing spending while cutting down manufacturing costs with lousy specs. How does anybody in there think this is still a winning strategy baffles me.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-337606
                        • thY
                        • 03 Dec 2014

                        Why it is so expensive? >.

                          • C
                          • Contract
                          • 3Jn
                          • 03 Dec 2014

                          AnonD-275729, 02 Dec 2014"The somewhat premium price is being metal " W... moreThe main "complaint" about Samsung is the use of plastic (toy?) in the flagship phone, whereas Metal quality premium etc, despite Samsung phones being the leader in specs.

                          Metal is a better heat conductor than plastic
                          Apple iPhones are marketed on this build alone, the actual specifications for iPhone are 2 - 3 years behind
                          Samsung

                          The overpricing of the both te A3 & A5 has to follow the Alphas pricing or if based on a similar plastic Samsung would take sales away whatever similar Samsung model it matched.

                          Samsung have added a premium price for 'metal' you could not upgrade to the Alpha even from a SGS 3 due to NO memory expansion in the Alpha

                          Consider the A3 & A5 as corrective measures just based on specs you would NOT be upgrading

                          The Alpha was to offer a metal clad phone so appeal to iPhone users who wanted an upgrade in specs.

                          Samsung have never until the Alpha dropped memory expansion. Can you imagine the S5, or Note 4 without it?

                          Apple keep recycling the same specs even if Django lives in denial the iPhone6 is a larger display iPhone5. http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4910&idPhone2=6378

                          The iPhone6 specs are years behind the Alpha which is less than perfect due to the serious omission of memory expansion or resembling an iPhone.

                            • P
                            • Price
                            • KZ8
                            • 03 Dec 2014

                            'The Samsung Galaxy A5 is priced at €410 and the A3 respectively at €310, which is reasonable, given their hardware'
                            -wtf. Thats really expensive. Better go with xiaomi, asus, meizu n others

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • bxb
                              • 03 Dec 2014

                              If iphone 5C fails, A3 and A5 will fail as well. People in China would rather buy xiaomi as budget phone

                                • d
                                • django
                                • XNa
                                • 03 Dec 2014

                                AnonD-126854, 02 Dec 2014Expensive???? We are talking about "full metal body p... moreApple never claims that iphone is premium because it uses metal.

                                And Samsung is not ape.
                                IPhone price won't drop 40% in 4 months.

                                  • D
                                  • AnonD-126854
                                  • Mmp
                                  • 02 Dec 2014

                                  Aadrian, 02 Dec 2014Very expensive for budgetphones. Overpriced and not special... moreExpensive????
                                  We are talking about "full metal body premium metal design" here.
                                  Because the Apple's propaganda was explaining the huge rip-off with their "full metal body premium metal design" , Samsung make joke with them making their low priced phones with the "full metal body premium metal design".
                                  ROTFL

                                    Very expensive for budgetphones. Overpriced and not special at all. Next.

                                      • J
                                      • Jani
                                      • 6qx
                                      • 02 Dec 2014

                                      Smart OIS for camera,please! Samsung.

                                        • F
                                        • Fade
                                        • nmP
                                        • 02 Dec 2014

                                        A hundred euros cut from both prices and it would be reasonable. The A3 should be about 200 not 300 euros. The only things Snapdragon 410 has better than Snapdragon 400 are less power draining cpu gpu combo and just slightly more power in cores(considering gaming) and the 64bit support. But seriously it's basically just Snapdragon 400 with 64bit. The GPU is the same. Only better with power draining. And the cores are only about 10% more powerful. So 10% it just as the name aplyes: 410 vs 400.