Purported blurry image of Moto X (2015) appears on Twitter
- .
- ...
- rKN
- 14 Jun 2015
A good battery life and storage capacity with a reasonable price to go along with that specs would make me pay happily.
- D
- AnonD-94867
- KZ8
- 14 Jun 2015
Equipping the phone with the infamous S810 could yield disastrous results. I verily hope Motorola would use the S805 instead...
- D
- Demo
- mMv
- 14 Jun 2015
SabbyJ, 14 Jun 2015Lumia's back much?Yeah, but it looks good.
- ?
- Anonymous
- t7W
- 14 Jun 2015
Why did they have to scrape the ring flash?
- A
- Amr
- Sdr
- 14 Jun 2015
Why Companies still using SD810 after failure of HTC one m9 & Sony Z4b???
- ?
- Anonymous
- uvw
- 14 Jun 2015
Looks hideous and huge..definitely not a 5.2" phone..SD 810 PROCCESSOR = HUGE FAILURE...motorola is going down the drain this year...
- D
- AnonD-168681
- Q$N
- 14 Jun 2015
1440p 5.2 inch screen (on screen buttons no Driod turbo style plz) snapdragon 808, 3-4 gb of ram, 32/64 gb of internal storage and most likely no micro sd card support (I cry every time), 3000+ mah battery none of that 2300mah weak sauce they touted on the 2014 model, front facing stereo speakers (Sesame street guys : 2 speakers not 1 for all that is technological holy 2 speakers with left and right audio on the front) and the camera I don't care who you have to kiss up to but ois 16+ mp
- ?
- Anonymous
- nIx
- 14 Jun 2015
Anonymous, 14 Jun 2015phones are dead bring VRTrust me, Phones aren't dead yet
- H
- HulK
- uZa
- 14 Jun 2015
All the way for Moto X. I luv it....still no other competitor can match its built quality, except HTC (for HTC One).
Me and my few friends are among those who believe in quality and materials, instead speed race. It's as simple as driving a Bentley for luxury and comfort and not driving ferrari for speeding.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3xK
- 14 Jun 2015
Actually it's dead bringing the damn
Snapdragon 810. Qualcomm is destroying
alot of phone this year.
- ?
- Anonymous
- NaM
- 14 Jun 2015
phones are dead bring VR