Samsung BRITECELL camera detailed, white pixels replace green ones
- G
- G5 user
- 9LA
- 13 Jan 2016
this white pixel.... remenbers me moto x and the white pixel thing on camera
- D
- AnonD-484212
- A0p
- 04 Jan 2016
AnonD-219349, 23 Nov 2015I still can't figure out how the S7 would capt green, yell... moreYeah, I'm wondering about the same thing. If anybody knows more I would be happy to hear about it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7FC
- 07 Dec 2015
And I still say the best thing they could ever do is combine the Beam and the Zoom into the Note. In a couple years I see maybe the Beam, but I don't know abour the Zoom
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7FC
- 07 Dec 2015
This great and I understand its nice to reduce size and have a thinner phone with a smaller sensor and theoretically still be better.
But why not at least try this with larger pixels on a thicker phone. Like maybe the Zoom.
- D
- AnonD-219349
- Jqt
- 23 Nov 2015
I still can't figure out how the S7 would capt green, yellow and other depending colors like orange whit it's RBW sensor. I know it will but dunno how.
- Dual heatpipes
- vV5
- 21 Nov 2015
why don't use RGB+W?
the Samsung britecell lack of Green? is it really no problems?
- s
- s8226
- t6G
- 20 Nov 2015
Kr, 18 Nov 2015Do u know note 4, 5, s6 series has either sony imx 240 or s... moreYes. Both sensors are good equaly. While sony sensor is a bit more rich colored and better in daylight, samsung sensor has more accurate white balance and is better in night. But the difference between two is minimal. So which sensor my galaxy note5 or s6 have is not important.
- R
- Ritzie
- ib7
- 19 Nov 2015
1ns0mniac, 19 Nov 2015I'm having a feeling... They r gonna screw S7 camera!Can you please expound more and why?
- S
- Stan
- ku%
- 19 Nov 2015
Anonymous, 18 Nov 2015"...now they have buyed the Toshiba sensor bussiness..." ... moreNikon uses Sony sensors for the most part, and Aptina everywhere else.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2Zt
- 19 Nov 2015
1ns0mniac, 19 Nov 2015I'm having a feeling... They r gonna screw S7 camera!"I'm having a feeling... They r gonna screw S7 camera!"
I have just the opposite feeling.
- A
- Anonymous
- 4SS
- 18 Nov 2015
Anonymous, 18 Nov 2015White; bright; brite-cell. Even without reading info about ... moreAh, that was very sharp of you to interpret it that way. I also break the words down too and find Brit-stands for a certain country , E-stands for electroluminescent, and of course Cell refers to something small.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7Xq
- 18 Nov 2015
White; bright; brite-cell. Even without reading info about the tech's concept and whatnot, common sensically it should come to one's own taking that this tech aims to brighten image production and more notably on images taken in low light, resulting perhaps from those white pixels. 'Cause dark pixels brightens an image, do they not? Perhaps this could be their response to LG G4's impressive Night Mode
- t
- the tech nerd
- utJ
- 18 Nov 2015
Anonymous, 18 Nov 2015"... they do the ISOCELL cameras but dont use it on theyr d... moreI think the news was that Sony buys Toshiba's sensor department
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7Xq
- 18 Nov 2015
[deleted post]If Nokia also knew what they were doing, they would have still been around swaggering like a king
- ?
- Anonymous
- mTn
- 18 Nov 2015
"...now they have buyed the Toshiba sensor bussiness..."
Didn't Nikon use Toshiba sensors too?
- ?
- Anonymous
- mTn
- 18 Nov 2015
xTREAMER, 18 Nov 2015is all blablabla from sammy, they do the ISOCELL cameras bu... more"... they do the ISOCELL cameras but dont use it on theyr devices..."
Samsung used ISOCell in the International Galaxy S5 amongst others. So they DO use them themselves.
"...now they have buyed the Toshiba sensor bussiness..."
As to why Samsung bought Toshiba's Cell-business? My personal conspiracy theory is that they're probably in search for that incredible Nokia 808Pureview sensor that Toshiba made for them and see if they can copy it without getting a lawsuit up their arse.
Now if these Koreans might actually start using whatever braincells the still have and STOP making sensors smaller and phones thinner. That would actually help a LOT without making things just overcomplicated! Not just for camera's but also for heat dissipation and throttling. But apparently thinking like this is way to simple for these bozo's to understand.
Oh, and BTW, Samsung/Toshiba/whoever-sells-camera-centric-smartphones: A real camera-centric phone has a REAL FLASH!!!!
- R
- Rdmkr
- MrU
- 18 Nov 2015
This is what I call innovation. None of that apple hipster crap that shoddily passes for it in common parlance.
- E
- Eske Rahn
- 3ii
- 18 Nov 2015
AnonD-357853, 18 Nov 2015This was exactly what I was about to post. (R+B) - W = G. B... moreWell yes and no.
It can give better lo light abilities, BUT it burns out faster in high light, so it will need to use shorter exposure times, and this reduces the dynamic range by more noise in the darker areas.
It is a trade off. Whether this is better or worse is a matter of usage patterns.
Those taking primarily indoor pictures will see it as better in poor light.
Those taking primarily outdoor pictures will see it as worse for high contrast images.
- E
- Eske Rahn
- 3ii
- 18 Nov 2015
AnonD-426702, 18 Nov 2015Thanks guys, this is what I figured.
Still I (as a consume... moreWell unfortunately no sensor avoids the calculations... The Foveon is the best in this aspect.
With a classic Bayer-filtered sensor, the output the user see is (R, G, B) at each pixel. But this means a lot of guessing / calculation have to be done, as each pixel-sensor only give one colour. For the others you need to calculate them (Depending on the pixel layout, this can be more or less complex, but is still an educated guess). This is all this guessing that give artefacts, when the guessing fails.
(That is why Bayer is just as incorrect on the pixel count counting each as when Foveon counts the stacked ones)