Evidence suggests Apple’s ‘AirPods’ could happen, we just don’t know when

15 July, 2016
With leaks continually suggesting that the iPhone 7 could be released without a 3.5mm headphone jack, the idea of Apple releasing fully wireless ear buds isn’t entirely impossible. In fact, the tech giant has filed trademarks in the US with the name “AirPods”.

Sort by:

nm, 16 Jul 2016Dont worry It will be better than galaxy Spurifier.Lolz... I'm no galaxy fan!

    • S
    • Shaun(-_-)
    • kiQ
    • 16 Jul 2016

    So Apple filing patent without anything solid to back it or is just a strategy to say they have an earbud in order to look like they are not logging behind as usually because of Samsund new earbud?

      • D
      • AnonD-299946
      • 6vT
      • 16 Jul 2016

      Anonymous, 16 Jul 2016They'll just give you an lightning to 3.5mm adapter, like s... moreGive you ?? No, this is Apple, they will make it as an optional accessory and sell it for $80.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • J%e
        • 16 Jul 2016

        AnonD-191847, 16 Jul 2016I believe they are really pushing their luck with this. I d... moreThey'll just give you an lightning to 3.5mm adapter, like some androids are planning to do with a USB C to 3.5mm

          nm, 16 Jul 2016Dont worry It will be better than galaxy Spurifier.That purifier actually do exist.

          http://www.samsung.com/in/consumer-images/product/air-purifier/2015/AX70J7000WT/NA/features/AX70J7000WT-NA-122178-0.jpg

            • D
            • AnonD-191847
            • LaJ
            • 16 Jul 2016

            I believe they are really pushing their luck with this. I don't know how many people will be able to get over the lack of a headphone jack, no matter how sheep they are to apple. 99% of top performance headphones are wired. Wireless headphones are significantly more expensive than their wired counterparts. And we all know headphones are consumables, they break very easily. So even if apple includes wireless headphones with their device, what happens when they break? Should people spend $150 or more for wireless headphones? I don't think anyone would be happy.

            I know they believe their fan base and brand recognition allows them to do anything to cut costs, but this is just stupid. Next year they'll remove the camera and tell people they can buy a wireless one separately.

              Anonymous, 16 Jul 2016Much like how Gear IconX is an accessory: "AirPods sold sep... moreBut will cost 2x more than gearX

                • n
                • nm
                • U{7
                • 16 Jul 2016

                ethereal, 16 Jul 2016When shall they launch AirPurifier for the air polluted by ... moreDont worry It will be better than galaxy Spurifier.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • 2SL
                  • 16 Jul 2016

                  AnonD-246723, 16 Jul 2016Need a whole article.... for a rumour Bluetooth headset Its Apple. That's the fuel for this website. In a couple of hours this article will have more comments than any other posted along with it.

                    When shall they launch AirPurifier for the air polluted by their AirStuff I just wonder :D

                      Anonymous, 16 Jul 2016Much like how Gear IconX is an accessory: "AirPods sold sep... moreGear Icon X is optional. Without a headphone jack, Apple simply ripping off the customer if they sold it separately.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-246723
                        • bCk
                        • 16 Jul 2016

                        Need a whole article.... for a rumour Bluetooth headset

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • 7X7
                          • 16 Jul 2016

                          Much like how Gear IconX is an accessory: "AirPods sold separately"

                            1 of 1