LG announces Watch Style and Watch Sport smartwatches running Android Wear 2.0

08 February 2017
Prices start at $249 for the more basic Watch Style and $349 for the fully-loaded Watch Sport.

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-632062
  • 3Yc
  • 09 Feb 2017

Design wise, the LG watches looks pretty nice!

    • D
    • AnonD-39937
    • ajP
    • 09 Feb 2017

    AnonD-643056, 09 Feb 2017Claudiu the Qualcomm platform is almost 1 year old and they... moreyou are right, I want too much from them...

      • D
      • AnonD-39937
      • ajP
      • 09 Feb 2017

      Anonymous, 09 Feb 2017Double the battery life? Possibly, but only if the the cpu ... morethe single difference between A32 and A35 is that A32 is limited to 32-bit...the idea is to give up the old A7, A32,A35 doesn't matter

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • j5$
        • 09 Feb 2017

        AnonD-39937, 08 Feb 2017Seriously? SOC with A7 cores on 28nm on a device that needs... moreDouble the battery life? Possibly, but only if the the cpu is constantly engaged. Otherwise, the screen, especially one with this resolution (nearly 350ppi), is going to be the biggest eater of electrons (or holes, one supposes).
        My preference would be to skip the a35, to right to the a32. They also need, and may have done this, an m-class cpu island to offload handling of sensors.

          • D
          • AnonD-643056
          • pkn
          • 09 Feb 2017

          AnonD-39937, 08 Feb 2017Seriously? SOC with A7 cores on 28nm on a device that needs... moreClaudiu the Qualcomm platform is almost 1 year old and they are having 2yr iterations. Your requests are more than entitled, but we can't expect the same tech refresh as in our phones at the moment. If demand is going to be higher and also competitors from Mediatek and Samsung are gonna be significant, we can expect those performance leaps. Maybe next year.. We will have a 1 week battery watches with full features support, but probably in 3 years.

            • D
            • AnonD-39937
            • ajP
            • 08 Feb 2017

            Seriously? SOC with A7 cores on 28nm on a device that needs battery life in 2017? It would cost that much to put A35 cores on 14nm and have double the battery life? And BT4.2 LE? This device uses BT like air, it should have 5.0 because phones will have in a month... Qualcomm is sleeping, they renamed the mediocre Snapdragon 400 as Wear 2100 and that's it? ... Really? they like staying mediocre and let companies like Apple and Samsung take all the market

              • J
              • JackTheIPhoneKiller
              • KIB
              • 08 Feb 2017

              Why Saudi Arabia and UAE but not in Pakistan??