Samsung launches U Flex bendable Bluetooth headphones
- ?
- Anonymous
- gMD
- 22 Aug 2018
One ear piece side of the device has come off.Is there a way to fix it back??
- H
- Hello Life
- g3e
- 24 Apr 2018
Anonymous, 08 Aug 2017The LG HBS-Series are superior in design. Regarding audio, ... morewell .. samsung owns harman.. lol
- ?
- Anonymous
- F4a
- 13 Aug 2017
If u can add opt. waterproof...pls
- W
- WAc
- akH
- 10 Aug 2017
Pixel87, 07 Aug 2017Looks great ,bendable and splash resistant. I bet it won't ... moreYes i agree with you, Samsung always play with prices. They will make luxurious starts from US$ 200 to 300 for rich people satisfaction and later you will find same headphones in Promotion Sale cartons in cheap market :D actually in reality their products are not expensive but they just manipulate the prices.
- D
- AnonD-24741
- mY{
- 09 Aug 2017
imparanoic, 08 Aug 2017actually, skullcandy have very poor specifications on paper... moreJust clicked on the first cheap Skullcandy on littlewoods.ie, the first link that came up on google; Skullcandy Jib. Cost: 9.90 euro. Frequency response: 20-20,000 Hz. That's beyond anything any person can hear. Yet, there's no doubt they sound tinny, broken bass, non-existent mid range and most likely extremely eardrum torturing highs. :D
- vrvly
- g5f
- 08 Aug 2017
AnonD-24741, 07 Aug 2017Frequency response numbers doesn't help to indicate anythin... moreMaybe, but its kind of shady, would at least want that freq.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3xT
- 08 Aug 2017
The LG HBS-Series are superior in design. Regarding audio, I am not able to talk; but considering the track record of Samsung vs. LG in the audio department, I would say LG si superior; especially the LG HBS-900, with the Harman cooperation, which made those headphones sound really crisp, altough with a little lack of bass.
- ?
- Anonymous
- t7G
- 08 Aug 2017
I bought Samsung Level U Pros earlier this year. Broke last week. Dunno if I should buy another Samsung branded wireless headset.
- i
- imparanoic
- U$3
- 08 Aug 2017
mir, 08 Aug 2017So what? Were you even one of the people who developed the ... moreinnovation is what counts, sony has been making earphones for the last 60 years, they have constantly innovated in earphones and headphones, ie, ldac, high bitrate wireless ( 3 times higher than standard bluetooth, even 50% higher than forthcoming bluetooth 5.0 and aptx hd), balanced armature ( wired in parallel, without using crossovers,by tuning the balanced armature to high, low, mid ect), sport earphones with waterproof features, digital noise cancellation for their flagship phones and walkmans, they have earphones /headphones from US$15 to US$2500,
- i
- imparanoic
- U$3
- 08 Aug 2017
AnonD-24741, 07 Aug 2017Frequency response numbers doesn't help to indicate anythin... moreactually, skullcandy have very poor specifications on paper and poor fidelity compare to leading edge, their target market is not audiophiles, it's mass market and hipsters, who never look at specifications
- m
- mir
- sxs
- 08 Aug 2017
AnonD-690277, 07 Aug 2017Yeeea... Sony first did this like 5 years ago and theirs is... moreSo what? Were you even one of the people who developed the device? Because you seem so proud about it.
- R
- RyGuy
- 8ae
- 08 Aug 2017
I assume these will be on par sound wise with the Level U Pros. Which was quite decent, but distorted a little at max volume. The worst thing about them is they don't block outside low-end. Actually the opposite, they accentuate it! The stiff cable and long stem piece made them uncomfortable when turning your head. These don't look any better in that regard.
- D
- AnonD-24741
- mY{
- 07 Aug 2017
vrvly, 07 Aug 2017No info about freq response, impedance, sensitivity. Just p... moreFrequency response numbers doesn't help to indicate anything about sound quality.
A pair of 5 buck skull candy earphones has numbers that goes beyond anything a person can hear.
- J
- Jimbob
- gKH
- 07 Aug 2017
Without retractable earbuds they are meh.
- vrvly
- g5f
- 07 Aug 2017
Luxor, 07 Aug 2017Dude, its just earphones. You really going there. Fighting ... moreNo info about freq response, impedance, sensitivity. Just premium sound. More than premium headphones I would call it bixby headphones, as thats main feature, not sound quality. Yes, its not about who first, but who's better. Its audio quality vs. Bixby with so much info as it is right now.
- vrvly
- g5f
- 07 Aug 2017
AnonD-690277, 07 Aug 2017Yeeea... Sony first did this like 5 years ago and theirs is... moreAlso remembering sony, kind of fun seeing it as new and super premium, and I don't mean just this samsung one. But I'd definitely welcome new ones as with open ear style from sony to hear outside or with bone conduction what may make apple with an ability to minimize noise and maximize voices. Just not the same old made as new cool invention.
- L
- Luxor
- HjB
- 07 Aug 2017
AnonD-690277, 07 Aug 2017Yeeea... Sony first did this like 5 years ago and theirs is... moreDude, its just earphones. You really going there. Fighting over who is first. Lol.
- D
- AnonD-690277
- fmK
- 07 Aug 2017
Yeeea... Sony first did this like 5 years ago and theirs is more ergonomic and waterproof - nice to see Samsung is keeping up with the times. *slow clap*
https://www.sony.com/electronics/walkman/nwz-w273-nwz-w274s
- D
- AnonD-632062
- Hxc
- 07 Aug 2017
Luxor, 07 Aug 2017I believe the predecessor is Samsung Level U. That's why th... moreYou are absolutely correct. It's just that that unlike "Level U", the name "U Flex" looks related to HTC smartphones such as "U Ultra" and "U Play".
- Y
- Your Welcome!
- UD{
- 07 Aug 2017
AnonD-490165, 07 Aug 2017Soooo...they made a BeatsX, but not as usable since you won... moreWhat is impressive, though, is the proprietary Scalable Codec tech, that is available if the connected smartphone runs on Android Nougat 7.0 or above.
-Your Welcome!