Google Pixel 2 photo and video samples - there's a puppy and portraits inside
- D
- AnonD-425519
- Y7F
- 19 Nov 2017
Anonymous, 19 Nov 2017you have no idea about pixels camera holmesI owned 2 Pixels a few months ago, so yes, I do know, child.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XMp
- 19 Nov 2017
AnonD-425519, 11 Oct 2017I understand but the samples shown on GSMArena show the exa... moreyou have no idea about pixels camera holmes
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 16 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 10 Oct 2017I'm "on about" your language nitpick and how no device is c... moreRead the whole thread, my comment was answering someone else question why the phones were not waterproof.
Never once did I state or even imply that any device was waterproof.
Someone else comment and my reply.
"So you're aware you're complaining about design?
How isn't the pixel."waterproof" (lookup the specifications of ip67 & ip68)?"
Waterproof: impervious to water
Water-resistant: able to resist the penetration of water to some degree but not entirely.
- D
- AnonD-425519
- Y7F
- 11 Oct 2017
AnonD-696746, 10 Oct 2017I hate apple pricing and philosophies.
Still iphone 8 an... moreI understand but the samples shown on GSMArena show the exact same bad post processing. Maybe the iPhone X will have a better camera.
What's the sensor size of the iPhone 8? I'm thinking it's the same 1/3 but not sure. I read it has image stacking, which is good, but it still cannot beat S8, S7 nor the Pixel and Pixel 2.
- D
- AnonD-696746
- 4mr
- 10 Oct 2017
AnonD-425519, 07 Oct 2017except if you shoot with an Apple phone, you'll have a blur... moreI hate apple pricing and philosophies.
Still iphone 8 and 8 plus are not like you said.
They made a BIG improvement what you said apply to older iphone not the newer one.
- D
- AnonD-660035
- gBq
- 10 Oct 2017
AnonD-603817, 10 Oct 2017Not about real progress? Did you actually look through the ... moreHave you seen photos of some Nokia phones years ago? A smaller sensor isn´t progress, it´s only progress for their profits. But I´m sure for you everything is progress what huge corporations are doing only because they are huge companies.
- D
- AnonD-623173
- M{V
- 10 Oct 2017
I will NEVER buy another Google branded phone ever again! They deliberately ignore certain markets. And then complain they don't have the market share other brands have. Poor Google...
- ?
- Anonymous
- j5$
- 10 Oct 2017
AnonD-501724, 10 Oct 2017What are you on about? don't understand for a minute what y... moreI'm "on about" your language nitpick and how no device is completely "impervious to water".
This might be my fault, however, because I interpreted you're earlier comment as a complaint that the new pixels aren't "waterproof" like the Galaxy devices. If you don't think those are "waterproof" then I mistook your intention.
- D
- AnonD-603817
- 4yy
- 10 Oct 2017
AnonD-660035, 08 Oct 2017Why we are still some way off lager sensors? We had larger ... moreNot about real progress? Did you actually look through the gallery? Did you even notice the quality of the photos? That's coming from a sensor the size of your pinkie finger nail... How is that NOT progress?
- D
- AnonD-603817
- 4yy
- 10 Oct 2017
Love how Google managed to do their portrait mode with the help of AI instead of dual cameras (you know, like Apple) Google's already surpassed Apple with Pixel 2. All iPhone has going for it now is customer loyalty and brand recognition.
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 10 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 09 Oct 2017Then no device that I'm aware of will suffice as pressures ... more. Sorry my window refreshed and reposted the same content
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 10 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 09 Oct 2017Then no device that I'm aware of will suffice as pressures ... moreWhat are you on about? don't understand for a minute what your comments have to do with my comment you replied to
- D
- AnonD-425519
- Y7F
- 09 Oct 2017
asdfghjkl, 08 Oct 2017don't you know dude that the selfie sensors are good for po... moreI think you misunderstood :).
I am saying the rear cameras of iPhones are made to be used as the front cameras since the sensors are so small (1/3 in.).
Other phone manufacturers are using that size for the front facing cameras (1/3") while using 1/2.3 or 1/2.5 for rear facing cameras.
- ?
- Anonymous
- j5$
- 09 Oct 2017
AnonD-501724, 09 Oct 2017Waterproof: impervious to water
Water-resistant: able to r... moreThen no device that I'm aware of will suffice as pressures can increase to the point that you'll cause physical damage.
The closest rating meets this is ip69k, and there's a phone called cat s40 meets it. Enjoy your brick.
- L
- Lex79
- pL%
- 09 Oct 2017
AnonD-660035, 08 Oct 2017@Lex79 I don´t like it cause I want better picture qu... moreNot saying it doesn't.
Maybe there is cost constraints, maybe implementing larger sensor will still require designs with larger camera protrusions on device designs (running contrary with OEM's current slimmer and more uniform design philosophies).....who knows.
What I'm saying is that whatever the reason, it doesn't seem to be the direction the market is currently looking to go in.
But all is not lost, the results coming off devices like this Pixel 2 are amazing, and that's down to impressive work being done in the field of computational photography.
Having said all that, could be we see something hit the market next year with say a 1/1.2 (or bigger) sensor. It's just that everything I've been reading from various sources doesn't suggest we expect it.
- DenisXD
- 0Vf
- 09 Oct 2017
Well it's a 2017 flagship, you expected anything less?
God with the speed technology is evolving ha? We will be having almost dslr cameras in smartphones pretty soon.
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 09 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 08 Oct 2017Time of exposion and depth.
Ip68 is better than ip67.
... moreYes IP68 is better than IP67, but it could also be very similar, IP68 allows for the manufacturer to determine the depth provided it is 1m or more, and the duration 100% up to the manufacturer, so you could end up with a phone that is 1m for 5 minutes if they wanted.
IP67 is locked by the definition, must be up to 1m and must be 30 minutes to not allow water that could harm the device
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 09 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 08 Oct 2017So you're aware you're complaining about design?
How isn't... moreWaterproof: impervious to water
Water-resistant: able to resist the penetration of water to some degree but not entirely.
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 09 Oct 2017
AnonD-680667, 08 Oct 2017IP67 means that the device should be water resistant for up... moreYour interpretation of IP ratings is not quite right, the 8 in 68 means 1m or more and for whatever depth (over 1m) & duration the manufacturer decides.
Also if you read the fine print very closely you shouldn't even use them in a pool (due to chemicals), so in actual fact these IP rantings are realistically a con
- D
- AnonD-501724
- I@b
- 09 Oct 2017
You can see that they still need some work on the algorithm for bokeh, many fuzzy edges, and parts of the image that should be blurred and not blurred, although in saying that, it must be much easier for them to achieve this only having one camera, than that of the dual camera phones