DxO Mark praises Galaxy S9+ with a score of 99
- ?
- Anonymous
- i}3
- 01 Mar 2018
dxo is a joke of a site..
- D
- AnonD-113455
- IbE
- 01 Mar 2018
Anonymous, 01 Mar 2018Some company can not do that. It's about ethic. Just look... moreEvery country in the world has more or less of bribery including Japan and US.
- D
- DxO Huh
- 8cg
- 01 Mar 2018
DxO turned to be fully mobile benchmark...
Still waiting their score on some Sony FE Lens that out for a few months.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ncG
- 01 Mar 2018
lewein, 01 Mar 2018never trust DxO! they are paid.Now that the Samsung Galaxy S9+ camera had a excellent test and score, the results are fake and the site is paid, but if was a camera of an iPhone or of a Sony phone with these results it was worthy and true and it was a good testing site. Fanatic, depreciative and fool people who don't stand with Samsung and their technology of smartphones, discriminatory and racist, don't like the Koreans and their technology and have envy of their success as the biggest conglomerate and company of the world who those people don't like and don't respect.
- N
- NoMatter
- niH
- 01 Mar 2018
I'm sorry, but looking at the samples comparison provided in the article samsung looks worst of them all. No contrast at all (looks like HDR is always on), colours is completely off.
- ?
- Anonymous
- kqQ
- 01 Mar 2018
[deleted post]Some company can not do that. It's about ethic.
Just look Samsung bribery scandal to the South Korean Government. It might caused former president Park Geun-hey 20-30 years in prison.
Now South Korean's prosecutors have decided to investigate a direct bribery link between ex-President Lee Myung-bak and Samsung officials. It's another scandal.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQt
- 01 Mar 2018
There are 9 itens for photo.
7 of them S9+ has lower score than Pixel 2. S9+ only wins for noise and zoom. And still higher score of photos.
New protocol sucks. Quality matters more than hardware.
- D
- AnonD-311835
- pF0
- 01 Mar 2018
Samsung just made DxO Mark filthy rich sending them big fat check!!
- M
- MdN8
- akv
- 01 Mar 2018
Zenodroid, 01 Mar 201899? Didn't some phones score over 100, a few months ago. Looking at the page, two DSLRs scored 100, and two scored above. Nothing about phones (99, 98, 97, 97...). I remember reading something like that too, but I guess it was about DSLRs.
- S
- Shifa
- tVq
- 01 Mar 2018
Good scores by Galaxy S9+.. I wish HTC U12 will bettered S9+ and performed well in real world too..
- M
- MdN8
- akv
- 01 Mar 2018
[deleted post]They also test Apple. Others don't send phones in for testing. Well. Then wait until GSMArena tests the display and tells you the same. Sony users... Yawn.
- S
- Sonu4678
- PT@
- 01 Mar 2018
I hope the S9's camera is really worth the hype, that being said "do not believe in DxOMark".
I don't have anything against DisplayMate, their testing results are usually true.
- ?
- Anonymous
- KZ8
- 01 Mar 2018
Most comprehensive does not mean the best
- M
- MdN8
- akv
- 01 Mar 2018
AnonD-731491, 01 Mar 2018Fakedxomark Only publish what you send samaung lol does not... moreAre you talking about DxO or DisplayMate now? Plenty of phones tested on DxO. As for displays, GSMArena tests displays as well. And they agreed, for example, about the S8. What now?
- D
- AnonD-731491
- gKV
- 01 Mar 2018
MdN8, 01 Mar 2018OK, this totally makes sense. Thank you for proving me wron... more There is no website that analyzes mobile screens, fakedxomark only publishes Advertorials
- D
- AnonD-731491
- gKV
- 01 Mar 2018
MdN8, 01 Mar 2018OK, this totally makes sense. Thank you for proving me wron... moreFakedxomark Only publish what you send samaung lol does not analyze anything, They only sell usbs to calibrate screens that nobody buys
- ?
- Anonymous
- w9x
- 01 Mar 2018
Let new pixel, iPhone come - then compare. Why comparing 2018 phone with 2017 phone. Ohh i forget samaung is 1 year behind.. see all their phone is still on android 7 ..or 7.1 ....then fine