Purported Samsung Galaxy S III specs revealed

17 September, 2011
There's a lot of crazy stuff here, including a quad-core processor and 1280 x 1024 Super AMOLED III display

Sort by:

  • A
  • Adrian
  • pkn
  • 18 Sep 2011

How can u compete with this...seriously... It's leaving every possibility any other firms had in mind for next year in the dust..

    • R
    • ReJA from dhaka
    • 2W5
    • 17 Sep 2011

    1280 x 1024 its 4:3 square but it's suppose to 16:9 or 16:10 like 1280x720(+/-) it's kinda wired ratio according to the modern age hd demand...

      • D
      • AnonD-22571
      • SeW
      • 17 Sep 2011

      Zain, 17 Sep 20119MM thickness is lower than the existing sgs2SGS 2 was 8.49 mm

        • e
        • ed
        • Mfx
        • 17 Sep 2011

        2ghz quad core
        impossible, this is a professional pc

          • T
          • Truth is...
          • iFr
          • 17 Sep 2011

          I won't buy other smartphone unless it has at least 3000mAh of power juice or better battery technology.

          and for god sake, give us a smartphone that can fit our pockets (3.7"~4.0" is more than enough).

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • pV%
            • 17 Sep 2011

            Anonymous, 17 Sep 2011Quad Core ? I love technology but Seriously this is ridicul... moreNo, you need it to do more things that are'nt even posible on phones yet!!! if you want to do that just get a cheap phone with a single core.

              • B
              • Bytales
              • gD7
              • 17 Sep 2011

              1280x1024 is not 4:3.
              1280x960 is 4:3
              1280x1024 is 5:4
              Last time i checked.

              It seems the specs are bigger than the galaxy note. But the Note is confortably close. Perhaps there will be a note 2 with specs similar to galaxy S III

                • D
                • AnonD-19959
                • t7r
                • 17 Sep 2011

                it wont be faster than your dual core laptop.
                A quadcore arm at 2.5ghz is only as fast as core 2 duo at 2ghz.
                We are talking about a core 2 duo and not even the core series which are faster or more productive at the same speed of the 2ghz core 2 duo.

                  • r
                  • rantamental
                  • dQG
                  • 17 Sep 2011

                  these specifications are really incredible
                  this resolution is too up and a quad-core cpu why we need a cpu like this ?! if sami wants to go on in this way , it will produce a 16 core cpu in near future ! sth upper than intel corei7 !
                  and battery is poor to run this device !! i think the material will be plastic again and samsung do not make a metal galaxy !
                  if it be from metal it should be heavy and not easy to carry !

                    • h
                    • hoola
                    • Iaa
                    • 17 Sep 2011

                    stop crying about the bigger screen guys, it'll be awesome and Im sure of it, can you imagine a 4 inch screen with 2GHz quad core processor, it would do things before we even touch the screen (exaggeration).
                    the bigger the screen the better (in my opinion) because it would be awesome to watch videos in it or play games and the Super AMOLED III display will be breathtaking on that size of a screen, if 4.3" is good enough to sell 5 million units in one week then 0.35" wont make THAT much of a difference.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • JxT
                      • 17 Sep 2011

                      Quad Core ? I love technology but Seriously this is ridiculous. Do you really need a quad core processor just to update your facebook status and play a game of angry freaking birds ?

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • Iaa
                        • 17 Sep 2011

                        this is gonna be one heck of a phone :D amazing resolution with a SUPER AMOLED display specially made for this phone. cant waiit :D

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • pu2
                          • 17 Sep 2011

                          These are the best specs I have ever seen in the world regardless of the gadget!

                          But aluminum body? I don't guess Samsung is going for it!

                            • y
                            • yay
                            • Lh@
                            • 17 Sep 2011

                            this might be real people but not the screen
                            nvida quadcore is coming in q4 this year so this will be real soooooo what about the GPU??? we really dont use quadcore phone but who cares here comes

                            PS2 DS and PSP emulator for android

                              • d
                              • dudi
                              • 3KC
                              • 17 Sep 2011

                              i think it far away from the realaty .1280 x 1024 its almost 4:3 square TV. quad clocked at 2 GHz ,the 2XXX mah battery wont be enough for the this quad cpu!! let alone the produced heat .
                              i think this is all possible but not in a 9mm thick phon

                                • D
                                • AnonD-22563
                                • 0CW
                                • 17 Sep 2011

                                1280 x 1024? Very strange resolution to be used! , but if true .. i think it will be non-square pixels , maybe it's due to the sub-pixel arrangement (some kind of High-PPI limitation in the SAMOLED manufacturing) , pentile arrangement come to my my mind where they will use 2 sub-pixel/pixel either red+green or blue+green (= RGBG)..

                                if the pixel width to height ratio is 4:3 (125% width) , then it will be equivalent to 1280 x (1024/4*3) = 1280 x 768 which is logical resolution with 5:3 display ratio (or 16:9.6 if you want to compare it to the 16:9 & 16:10 ratios )

                                  • Z
                                  • Zain
                                  • 0C3
                                  • 17 Sep 2011

                                  9MM thickness is lower than the existing sgs2

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • pV%
                                    • 17 Sep 2011

                                    This phone looks awesome. My next phone will be sgs3, without a doubt. It has better specs than the minimum windows 7 recomendations! WOW!

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • ssC
                                      • 17 Sep 2011

                                      thats the new generaaatiooon .. )) OS of this phone must be the same as on desktops ..

                                        • C
                                        • CaH9
                                        • 0xP
                                        • 17 Sep 2011

                                        !!!!!!.......my pc has only 1GB RAM and dual core 2,8ghz....this PHONE will be better than my PC?! :DDDD ridiculous....