Oppo "Poseidon" with Snapdragon 855 visits Geekbench
- ?
- Anonymous
- K6X
- 18 Jan 2019
AnonD-731363, 18 Jan 201910237 is Xperia XZ4.
Sony makes expensive devices but apa... moreWRONG! 12,801 is Sony Xperia XZ4 and 10,237 is Lenovo Z5 Pro GT.
Lenovo = trash and Sony = King.
https://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_xz4_with_snapdragon_855_is_now_on_geekbench_too-news-34908.php
https://www.gsmarena.com/lenovo_z5_pro_gt_pops_up_on_geekbench_with_snapdragon_855_on_board-news-35000.php
- D
- AnonD-731363
- SH3
- 18 Jan 2019
Anonymous, 16 Jan 2019That 12k is Xperia xz410237 is Xperia XZ4.
Sony makes expensive devices but apart from that many other brands doing better now.
- Walter C. Dornez
- r93
- 16 Jan 2019
Fayth, 16 Jan 2019it should be sea-waterproofWould be pretty ironic if it wasn't
- ?
- Anonymous
- D0g
- 16 Jan 2019
Anonymous, 16 Jan 2019Why is the Lenovo Z5 Pro GT listed twice in the multi-core ... moreThat 12k is Xperia xz4
- A
- Anonymous
- 7BD
- 16 Jan 2019
Shanti Dope, 16 Jan 2019See how Phone A with SD855 scores 3400 in single core, but ... moreWhy is the Lenovo Z5 Pro GT listed twice in the multi-core scores? Am I missing something?
- D
- AnonD-611364
- TRK
- 16 Jan 2019
Kiyasuriin, 16 Jan 2019That single core... It's amazing!It is indeed, though I doubt this will beat Apple's next chipset. But, I digress
- ?
- Anonymous
- NgF
- 16 Jan 2019
Shanti Dope, 16 Jan 2019See how Phone A with SD855 scores 3400 in single core, but ... moreIt's because of different software and not cheating
- S
- Sign99
- rK6
- 16 Jan 2019
There are two lenovo z5 pro GT in multi core so which is real and which one is xz4🤔
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4QP
- 16 Jan 2019
Shanti Dope, 16 Jan 2019See how Phone A with SD855 scores 3400 in single core, but ... moreYou almost had a point until you used the worst offense of all to try and make an example of better.
- S
- Shanti Dope
- I@H
- 16 Jan 2019
See how Phone A with SD855 scores 3400 in single core, but Phone B with SD855 scores 3800??
Clearly shows who's really cheating here.
If one manufacturer really knows that their product will not fail at anything in real life, then there's definitely no need to cheat on such things like this.
I hate cheaters in benchmark, because this thing was initially made with a purpose to test the real capabilities of the hardwares, not a marketing trick to fool people.
Now you can go on and brag about "It's part of the marketing, you freak!" but the truth is that there are far better ways to market a phone and still sell very well.
Just look at how well iPhones sell despite the simple marketings that they're doing. Not because they are an icon, because an iconic brand can easily be forgotten right after it fails for a long time, and Nokia is a living proof of it. Apple just creates good phones that require no bullsh*ts around.