Samsung Galaxy S10+ hits GeekBench again, Exynos 9820 scores improving
- ?
- Anonymous
- m2c
- 04 Feb 2019
Don Hrle, 04 Feb 2019Exynos(at least last years version) have schedulers tuned f... moreThey weren't tuned for Geekbench, don't spread misinformation. The SoC was rushed which resulted in some poor programming on the scheduler. Andrei admitted that himself in a later article, though he seems to have a downer on any Exynos SoC.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m2c
- 04 Feb 2019
Shanti Dope, 04 Feb 2019Like the Mali G72 MP18 graphics of the Exynos 9810 is destr... moreThe new G76 in the Exynos 9820 has jumped by 40% in performance compared to the previous Mali GPU. The gains made by the new Adreno 640 are smaller, so expect the gap to be narrowed.
- S
- Sonu4678
- K6t
- 04 Feb 2019
Furiounx, 04 Feb 2019Yes there is. It scored 12,000+ points, higher than an XS.I seriously doubt it.
It will have SD855, right?
The multicore score of 12000+ is just too high for the chipset.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XUu
- 04 Feb 2019
Snapdragon, Kirin and A processor are much better. Samsung always drink coffee while others work hard everyday to satisfy us
- ?
- Anonymous
- MAf
- 04 Feb 2019
Just about beats the Kirin 980
- A
- Aslipundit
- KAC
- 04 Feb 2019
DrakeX, 04 Feb 2019If these benchmarks are to be trusted and not just some clo... moreOnly the middle cores are A75 cores though. The M4 is a fully custom design and a much fatter core than the A75 or even the A76, which is why you see the kind of numbers on Geekbench.
Unfortunately, Anandtech tests using PC mark suite which is not good for Exynos CPUs due to some unknown reason. I don't really buy into those results to be honest.
- S
- Shanti Dope
- KgW
- 04 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 04 Feb 2019Meanwhile multiple generations of exynos had a better gpuLike the Mali G72 MP18 graphics of the Exynos 9810 is destroyed by the Adreno 630 graphics of the Snapdragon 845?
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Adreno-630-vs-Mali-G72-MP18_8780_8770.247598.0.html
- D
- Don Hrle
- 3qM
- 04 Feb 2019
Exynos(at least last years version) have schedulers tuned for Geekbench,but when shit hits the fan,come real world use,performance drops significantly and battery life plummets like Venezuelan currency.
- DrakeX
- KZK
- 04 Feb 2019
If these benchmarks are to be trusted and not just some clock speed boost when it detects Geekbench, then Samsung has truly leveled up, their custom cores have been engineered well. This is the closest any smartphone CPU has reached to Apple's level. This is despite using the last gen A75 cores and 8nm LPP process. Of course, it might not translate to a much superior real-life performance but it seems to pave in an optimistic road. Let's hope its not the same problem due to its scheduler like in Exynos 9810.
- ?
- Anonymous
- I8m
- 04 Feb 2019
Aslipundit, 04 Feb 2019True... Obviously Samsung will not have access to Adreno gp... moreMeanwhile multiple generations of exynos had a better gpu
- ?
- Anonymous
- I8m
- 04 Feb 2019
Furiounx, 04 Feb 2019Still underwhelming in comparison to Sony Xperia XZ4. Drop ... moreQuit being such a fan
- A
- Aslipundit
- KAC
- 04 Feb 2019
Shanti Dope, 04 Feb 2019Imagine this CPU design being paired with Qualcomm's Adreno... moreTrue... Obviously Samsung will not have access to Adreno gpu tech but they can use Powervr gpu, which are much better than power hungry and throttle friendly Mali designs.
- S
- Shanti Dope
- KgW
- 04 Feb 2019
Imagine this CPU design being paired with Qualcomm's Adreno GPU
Imagine....
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ng5
- 04 Feb 2019
Furiounx, 04 Feb 2019Still underwhelming in comparison to Sony Xperia XZ4. Drop ... moreStock android doesn't provide better performance
- F
- Furiounx
- P$W
- 04 Feb 2019
Sonu4678, 04 Feb 2019Personally, I like their skin now. They just have to remove... moreYes there is. It scored 12,000+ points, higher than an XS.
- S
- Sonu4678
- K6t
- 04 Feb 2019
Furiounx, 04 Feb 2019Still underwhelming in comparison to Sony Xperia XZ4. Drop ... morePersonally, I like their skin now. They just have to remove some duplicate apps.
My favorite android skins are One Plus and Samsung ones. Both are polar opposite but perform best in light and heavy skins respectively.
I didn't get the first part of your comment though. There aren't any leaked Geekbench scores for XZ4 right now. I would like to know if I missed something. I know there is a staggering AnTuTu score out there, but we can't compare them unless there is a leaked Geekbench score.
- F
- Furiounx
- P$W
- 04 Feb 2019
Still underwhelming in comparison to Sony Xperia XZ4. Drop the heavy skin already ffs.
- D
- Dorsefrith
- nu8
- 04 Feb 2019
Nice, but.... wait... this phone will have a hole in the screen.... #NotThisYearSamsung
- ?
- Anonymous
- E7E
- 04 Feb 2019
Aslipundit, 04 Feb 2019The gap in single threaded performance between flagship SOC... moresingle thread scores if you compare b/w 845, 710, 675, 835, 660 is not massive...
exynos and kirin flagships have better single thread scores than sd 845... and even 855....
so flagships in SD is now coming in 3000+ range... otherwise its 2500 to 2000
- U
- Ultimate Rugal
- fFC
- 04 Feb 2019
Who cares about benchmarking. Real life usage matters the most. Even mid range processors are good enough for normal daily use, like messaging, social medias, emails and looking on websites. Been using 2 years old Snapdragon 636, i am more than happy. PUBG handled nicely. Spend your money for something more important.