Here are our first Samsung Galaxy S10+ camera samples
- ?
- Anonymous
- NgF
- 21 Feb 2019
Lyndino, 21 Feb 2019But did Huawei team up with Adobe to create pro editing sof... moreI'll make it easier
Why the prices are high?
Answer: more profit
- ?
- Anonymous
- nmN
- 21 Feb 2019
Absolutely love the wide angle, telephoto is nice to have too but unessential. Will have to consider, how it'll fare up against other competition and hold up altogether.
- L
- Lyndino
- QHA
- 21 Feb 2019
BeObjective, 21 Feb 2019Honestly, this is nothing special. I expected more from the... moreBut did Huawei team up with Adobe to create pro editing software that can be done from the device?
Everybody initially complains about the price but nobody take's into account why the price is so high.
This phone pretty much nails all categories for every mobile use.
Sound - Dolby ATMOS
Display - HDR10+
Camera's - Pro Grade with Adobe collaboration for onboard editing
- Also teamed up with Instagram for whoever uses that platform
Gaming - Teamed up with Unity
.
Samsung did their homework and nailed it out of the park but everybody see's the price and compares it to cheap chinese phones and shrugs it off. People who appreciate what Samsung offers will continue to get their devices I can almost guarantee it. People who go for cheaper chinese phones do so only to save a couple bucks but are also sacrificing.
- L
- Lyndino
- QHA
- 21 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2019Dxo is pure bullshitI know nothing about DXO but why is it pure b.s?
- A
- Alex
- JKR
- 21 Feb 2019
A 50 mm equivalent is ALWAYS a standard, normal lens, no matter is it a phone, micro 3/4, APS-C, APS-H, full frame, medium format or a large format camera.
A 26 mm equivalent is NEVER a "standard FOV", no matter is it a phone, micro 3/4, APS-C, APS-H, full frame, medium format or large format camera.
Why do you have the need to invent something like "standard smartphone FOV" to justify the manufacturers marketing?
- F
- Fernas
- 8Z6
- 21 Feb 2019
Looks good (i guess). "Super steady" video is weird tho, it has some kind of artifacts, heavy artifacts, yeah looks super smooth, but it had some weird effects there.
- ?
- Anonymous
- myM
- 21 Feb 2019
Can it beat a Pixel though? Gotta be honest, I take photos of my kids, a lot. Really hoping the s10 devices deliver, because that 10+ has a smaller footprint than the Pixel, proper ram, and a cracking battery. Price is off putting though. Some crazy monthly prices quoted.
- S
- Spen
- gx3
- 21 Feb 2019
I really like the form factor. Why are all other companies unable to produce flagships with smaller width and height?
But the battery capacity of the Galaxy 10 lineup sucks big time and the price is just a bad joke. For around 400€ - 500€ on release I would probably take the S10e but 750€... no no no no
- B
- BeObjective
- dP$
- 21 Feb 2019
Honestly, this is nothing special. I expected more from the cameras and if you are only interested in camera Mate 20 (or even Xioami Mi 9) will do same for way less money.
- P
- Piper
- kvT
- 21 Feb 2019
Not looking nearly as sharp as the Pixel 3, particularly on the selfie shooter.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pqy
- 21 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2019DxO gave 114 rear photos, 96 front photos and 97 rear video... moreDxo is pure bullshit
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQv
- 21 Feb 2019
DxO gave 114 rear photos, 96 front photos and 97 rear videos.
Total of 109.