Samsung Galaxy Note10 devices in the US might come with Exynos chipsets

02 August 2019
This would be the first time the United States saw Exynos-powered variants of its flagship since the Galaxy S6.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • I8m
  • 11 Aug 2019

Nick Tagataka, 08 Aug 2019I need to correct myself here: Reading Anandtech's reviews,... moreWhich is why i corrected myself and said most.
And i as well didn't catch that shift starting with the 9820.
But i assume from that source you also realized why the single core is higher?
And the decent benefits this 7nm euv can bring?
Especially since the 9820 is bigger than the 8nm leads you to think. Like 127mm vs the other chips being 73-84mm.
So after using the 7nm euv process with almost no change to the cores or their clock rates... minus the itty bootsy to 2.4ghz...the cpu can run much better. If they update the scheduler that is. If so then in bursts the big cores might actually be able to flex some of their power. And the chip should be at least 25% more efficient if not a little more at the same time. Since they did put some of the balance into a gpu boost.
So overall improvement in CPU at same clock rate, gpu boost, little less throttle, more efficient...
So it's the idea and the hope..... or just a little more efficient hopefully.

    Snapdragon is more superior in gpu department, exynos better in cpu. Both chips still performane best in day to day life and nothing to worry about. Samsung is working with amd on next line gpus for exybos and mali new G series a way more superior than mali g76, so if you think exynos is bad because of gpu, that will change very soon

      Anonymous, 08 Aug 2019Even though that's how most work.. as far as I'm concerned... moreI need to correct myself here: Reading Anandtech's reviews, apparently CPU cores of Exynos 9820 onwards do NOT run at higher frequency even when there are only 1 or 2 cores are being used. The peak frequency of big cores remains the same at 2.73GHz regardless of the conditions on 9820/9825, unlike 8890 and 9810 where it scales between 2.7GHz and 1.8GHz depending on the number of active cores. So this is NOT how all CPU cores work. Kirin 980 for instance, just like Exynos 9820, does not have this kind of clock speed boost.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • I8m
        • 08 Aug 2019

        Nick Tagataka, 07 Aug 2019It's only Intel and Samsung's CPUs that show this kind of b... moreEven though that's how most work.. as far as I'm concerned that's not true. It's only Intel and samsung. Cause that makes me right in my mind even though its clearly false.....

          Anonymous, 07 Aug 2019That's how all single cores work It's only Intel and Samsung's CPUs that show this kind of behaviour as far as I concern.

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • I8m
            • 07 Aug 2019

            Nick Tagataka, 06 Aug 2019Interesting, could you tell me how it works then? It is a k... moreOr at least majority now a days. Especially regarding phones.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • 4QP
              • 07 Aug 2019

              Nick Tagataka, 06 Aug 2019Interesting, could you tell me how it works then? It is a k... moreThat's how all single cores work

                Dealler, 05 Aug 2019Nice BS to try to support your opinion, but that´s no... moreInteresting, could you tell me how it works then? It is a known fact that Samsung's custom CPU cores run at higher frequency when not all cores are used at the same time.

                  Nick Tagataka, 04 Aug 2019It scored high single core score on GB because of the way C... moreNice BS to try to support your opinion, but that´s not how things work.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • I8m
                    • 04 Aug 2019

                    Nick Tagataka, 04 Aug 2019It scored high single core score on GB because of the way C... moreWow. That's not why it scores higher in single.
                    Please stop pretending you know what your are talking about.
                    That's how they all work for single core. The reason it scores more for single core is because I'd the different core design.
                    Jeez get with the program

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • I8m
                      • 04 Aug 2019

                      Nick Tagataka, 04 Aug 2019Uhh, well, no.Uh well uh deeerp....
                      Yes. Sorry you don't know what you're talking about but that's not my fault

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • I8m
                        • 04 Aug 2019

                        Nick Tagataka, 04 Aug 2019Exynos S10 is worse than Snapdragon variant in 5 major area... moreThat doesn't back up the claims. Especially from the real world usage tests done from the same source

                          Anonymous, 02 Aug 2019Please back up your claims with proof.Exynos S10 is worse than Snapdragon variant in 5 major areas: CPU performance, GPU performance, power efficiency, audio quality of an integrated DAC and ISP(or image processing algorithms, or both). Anandtech has done a very detailed inspection on the difference between Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 855, and the difference is staggering.

                            Dealler, 02 Aug 2019It´s not inferior anymore. It scored better in single... moreIt scored high single core score on GB because of the way CPU scheduler is set - it boosts up the clock speed to the limit when only 1 or 2 cores are used at once, but CPU then scales back to lower frequency when it uses higher number of cores. There's no real life benefit for doing this though, and it's reasonable to assume that Samsung only implemented this feature so that it scores high in specific benchmarks that measure single core performance.

                              Anonymous, 03 Aug 2019Real life tests say otherwise. And the first 8 out of 10 ge... moreUhh, well, no.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • I8m
                                • 03 Aug 2019

                                Anonymous, 03 Aug 2019"The last time Samsung offered its flagships with the Exyno... moreActually even the s1 and s2 were globally exynos

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • 3pU
                                  • 03 Aug 2019

                                  "The last time Samsung offered its flagships with the Exynos processors was with the Samsung Galaxy S6."
                                  I knoe that onl6 in the USA and a few other markets the S lineup came with a Qualcomm SoC, the rest of the world got the Exynos version.
                                  *But before Samsung started making their own SoC, I think they used mostly Qualcomm.

                                    Whackcar, 02 Aug 2019I didn't know that I'm a website. Thank you for enlightenin... morePlease tell me you're joking. The image signal processor in an SoC has an impact on image quality too, the ISP interprets the data captured by the image sensor. The image sensor is only part of the whole equation.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • I8m
                                      • 03 Aug 2019

                                      hhaeatsie, 02 Aug 2019Exynos jus sucksReal life tests say otherwise. And the first 8 out of 10 gens were better. And the 7nm EUV process will make this more improved than in the s10

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • I8m
                                        • 03 Aug 2019

                                        Abhi Dahiya, 02 Aug 2019Fake news! Exynos and Snapdragon are not comparable in perf... moreThen why do test results show differently?

                                          1 of 3