DxOMark adds Wide and Night scores to its tests, Note 10+ tops recalculated results
- ?
- Anonymous
- PI2
- 19 Sep 2019
dx0mark is bias , should read neutral site like gsmarena
- R
- Rika
- 61I
- 19 Sep 2019
Pathetic. LG has been doing it and DxO was acting like (ultra) wide-angle was never exist until apple add it to their lineups. Holy pathetic!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3Rs
- 19 Sep 2019
Hahaha iPhone failed again .
- Eye see u
- vV5
- 19 Sep 2019
Please add the Panorama photo score to the ratings, Dxomark although I don't trust your reviews.
- G
- Gusta
- KiN
- 19 Sep 2019
There should be HDR test too..
- ?
- Anonymous
- KSu
- 19 Sep 2019
1000 plus dollar iPhone is below mi9.
What a joke device.
- S
- Sheesh
- IC1
- 19 Sep 2019
Love the Community, 18 Sep 2019Well, Apple is a trendsetter for people like them. While An... moreLeave the drugs alone
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQw
- 19 Sep 2019
SpiritWolf, 18 Sep 2019DXOMark is utter and complete trash. Just one example. Noki... moreFlash is not just how powerful it is.
There is the ability of keeping correct exposure and white balance.
Also it is an old hardware and software.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQw
- 19 Sep 2019
wasox, 18 Sep 2019I have a note10+ since the 11th, the night mode is excellen... morePhones with ultra wide have software distortion correction.
It crops the image.
- B
- Bingo
- nUk
- 19 Sep 2019
I don't think there is one single person out there who know something about phones who believes in Dxo mark. They are crap.
- N
- Nick
- nUk
- 19 Sep 2019
Who still believes in Dxo mark scores? S10+ 5G has the same score in night mode as P 30 pro... You need to be idiot to believe in this. P 30 pro is miles ahead of everything on the market now.
- C
- Carol
- gEW
- 18 Sep 2019
SpiritWolf, 18 Sep 2019DXOMark is utter and complete trash. Just one example. Noki... moreYeah, their is a reason why at the end their is a 0 in their name, is because they are null.
- l
- leledumbo
- thw
- 18 Sep 2019
Personally I don't really care about the scores, but the explanation of the updated Mi 9 review matches my findings. I hope Xiaomi never ever again drops OIS in its flagship devices. Their night mode can perform better with it. Exposure and texture are greatly enhanced, but the lack of OIS loses the detail and sharpness, making the images blurry even if just minimum. GCam magic still manages to capture better with only 25% of the used ISO and none of the disadvantages, only capture time is 3-4 seconds vs 1 second.
- S
- SpiritWolf
- m@2
- 18 Sep 2019
DXOMark is utter and complete trash. Just one example. Nokia 808 with powerful xenon flash got flash score 56. Galaxy S10 family with their weak led flash had over 90.
Curiously, seems they have removed flash score. One may think that iPhone 11 family got extra weak flash.
- w
- wasox
- 8V}
- 18 Sep 2019
I have a note10+ since the 11th, the night mode is excellent, and the ultrawide mode id the best I have seen, almost no distortion at sides, I am very happy with my device, I really do not care about scores or benchmarks, in the end, the user experience is what really matters, not what everybody else says
- A
- Anonymous
- Ji$
- 18 Sep 2019
Good well done Samsung
- ?
- Anonymous
- IbG
- 18 Sep 2019
people are still acting like this is something new about DXOmark...stop complaining if you are still visiting it. they have employees to pay for and a website to run. for sure it is not operating under donations and charity
- ?
- Anonymous
- XF@
- 18 Sep 2019
thada2607, 18 Sep 2019To anyone who's confused about why some phones felt off the... moreThey are still negotiating about the price
- D
- AnonD-762416
- m2A
- 18 Sep 2019
Love the Community, 18 Sep 2019Well, Apple is a trendsetter for people like them. While An... moreJust goes to prove how irrelevant and (inadvertently?) salted cross-platform benchmark scores are. Optimised for one platform, making all other parameters trivial.
A reality check meter would put an iPhone leaps behind the competition.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XF@
- 18 Sep 2019
Wow it looks like dxomark got a lot of money