Nokia 7.2's front camera found to be just average by DxOMark
- ?
- Anonymous
- bJb
- 07 Dec 2019
Silly Nokia, you have to pay them, that’s how it works
- DroidBoye
- vx2
- 05 Dec 2019
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2019LOL don't know what you are upto with can you feel xiaomi p... moreYour mindset is already limiting, we call it narrow-minded. Lol. Now did you even read my comment? Did I say that it is a ranking system? Did I say the bigger score would always come superior? You seem to act so smart and yet you ask me to which phone I "feel" to be better? At that point, your argument is already moot. Ranking the phone by feel is not what DXO is for. It seems as though you've already reached into immediate conclusion without even reading their own article and evaluating their test methodologies. Reading and comprehension is not that hard, use that thing between your ears instead of jumping into immediate conclusion.
Spoonfeed for d u m m i e s:
Nokia 7.2 front cam review:
https://www.dxomark.com/nokia-7-2-front-camera-review/
Front camera testing methodologies:
https://www.dxomark.com/dxomark-selfie-how-we-test-smartphone-front-camera-still-image-quality
Give essential facts to your argument, I've already gave facts unto mine so kindly do your part. Be specific.
- DroidBoye
- vx2
- 05 Dec 2019
Bla, 04 Dec 2019In my opinion there is no consistency with their results. E... moreTell me which device they did their review wrong?
What I don't like about people misinterpreting DXO's score is when people would get into sudden conclusion that it's a paid review when their beloved brand has scored low. There were lots of objective effort done by them on each and every device the problem is that, people don't even care to read the site's testing methodology.
With regards to this review of Nokia 7.2 front cam, did anyone even read this?
https://www.dxomark.com/nokia-7-2-front-camera-review/
or even this?
https://www.dxomark.com/dxomark-selfie-how-we-test-smartphone-front-camera-still-image-quality
People are so quick to conclude and yet, their arguments are empty, without facts. It seems as though people wants a review mostly based on feelings. lol.
- C
- Carol
- mVu
- 05 Dec 2019
So, this guys are not only useless, they just became pathetic, front camera test? Who cares? I mean, are their any persones to care about this reviews? This is just laughable.
- ?
- Anonymous
- P$6
- 05 Dec 2019
DroidBoye, 04 Dec 2019The way I see it, DXOmark is not a ranking system. It's mor... moreLOL don't know what you are upto with can you feel xiaomi phones are so good then Google Pixel phones and that of camera?
Just think about that DxOMark reviews are always bias who give them money.
Google Pixel phones have given always low rating then Xiaomi phones.
Do you feel Google Pixel 4 camera is less better then Xiaomi phones?
Find out this answer and let me know
#BanDxOMark
- ?
- Anonymous
- P$6
- 05 Dec 2019
LOL and funny if i see DxO Mark score for Nokia phones. This shows how they are greedy for money to get from HMD Global.
Greedy DxOMark #BanDxOMark
Zeiss Swirl, Zeiss Modern is a great thing and still they have said portrait mode is not good hats off to DxOMark.
One question to DxOMark when are you shutting down?
- 7
- 7.2 is disappointing
- 0T0
- 04 Dec 2019
Portrait mode: Goodbye fingers... xD
- M
- MKL
- jRv
- 04 Dec 2019
Yes. i don't buy phone without DxOMark good score. They are the 100% non biased authentic organization which runs by.................... blind people.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0Wh
- 04 Dec 2019
It'll be funny if it comes with an old fingerprint sensor, the typical bad cameras from HMD and a SD730 4G for 590 euros / $654 lol. Maybe a SD735 5G variant for 690 euros / $765. To watch the ammount of excuses that their blind sheeps continue inventing to justify it. Hopefully people will still notice the trap and avoid buy such an overpriced bricks.
- D
- DaleCooper
- 7kj
- 04 Dec 2019
Well, not gonna say that Nokia 7.2 has a good/bad camera.
Just gonna say that DXOMark is unrealistic and they are biased.
- B
- Boeing 747-400
- TKj
- 04 Dec 2019
December 5, tomorrow, 04 Dec 2019The upcoming Nokia 8.2 will be with 765G 5G chipset. This w... moreWithout a doubt, but we may end up getting the base model of the 8.2 instead. The 5G variant may be selected to other countries or an exclusive device that may be price near $800.
- B
- Boeing 747-400
- TKj
- 04 Dec 2019
Biased with Nokia=Not paying to DxO. Very cruel from DxO seeing that they care money and biasness. They have been bullying to Nokia for 7 years straight!!!!
- B
- Bla
- LiQ
- 04 Dec 2019
DroidBoye, 04 Dec 2019The way I see it, DXOmark is not a ranking system. It's mor... moreIn my opinion there is no consistency with their results. Even when some devices get so quick on testing and others not at all is really strange. Also, they are not here to say facts, they are only sharing their point of view and getting paid for it.
Btw I don't like how some OEMs have partnered with their site. Because those OEMs know exactly how their testing protocol works, which is helping them achieve better score. That's not fair.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0Wh
- 04 Dec 2019
December 5, tomorrow, 04 Dec 2019The upcoming Nokia 8.2 will be with 765G 5G chipset. This w... moreSince when is an overpriced mid-range phone with bad cameras legendary?
- D
- December 5, tomorrow
- 0T0
- 04 Dec 2019
The upcoming Nokia 8.2 will be with 765G 5G chipset. This will be a legendary phone, guys....
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0Wh
- 04 Dec 2019
I'mPhone, 04 Dec 2019DXO Mark has recently been biased about camera performance.... moreNokia 7.2 cost 370 euros / $400. Is a very overpriced phone with more than demostrated mediocre cameras. As usual from HMD-Nokia. And for that price, you can buy phones with a lot better cameras, even some flagships from previous years with better SoC, better cameras and ALL better.
- DroidBoye
- vx2
- 04 Dec 2019
This phone is already average on its own, DXOmark pointing this out (specifically the front camera) is just icing on the cake.
- DroidBoye
- vx2
- 04 Dec 2019
The way I see it, DXOmark is not a ranking system. It's more of just a scoring system of how much features you can get and how well the phone handles those features. One should not just look at the final score. Look at the breakdown or even read the whole article. I challenge all these haters here to read DXOmarks breakdowns and refute each of their process and conclusions if you doubt them. Can you point out their flaws? Can you give a better suggestion in how to improve the scoring system? DXOmark is as objective as possible, apparently, lots of people were just lazy understanding how their scoring works and how to properly interpret them.
- C
- Carol
- mgK
- 04 Dec 2019
Geric.770, 04 Dec 2019lul. At least consumers know what are the strength and weak... moreThat is, if you believe that reviews tare actually true... The whole internet is full of biased, which is quite normal. They want money, so they get money by promoting for who pays more... Nobody works for free. So, if you are smart enough, you can actually think for yourself. The reviews from amazon are more trusty (only the ones that assure they bought a device or whatever) even tough they are made sometimes by people who do not even know how to use that perticular device, but that's another storry.