Honor V30 Pro slides into second place on DxOMark camera chart
- L
- LG Superfan
- sSx
- 18 Jan 2020
Justinjt2020, 18 Jan 2020Right? So going by that logic why didn't a billion dollar c... moreBecause they know that people know their cameras are not the best and if they paid it will cause bad reviews and people will definitely know that DXO is paid?
- L
- LG Superfan
- 6Q9
- 18 Jan 2020
YUKI93, 18 Jan 2020Doesn't mean no one can buy one. I owned one, couldn't give... moreThe only Google services I need are Photos and Maps others are pretty much useless
- L
- LG Superfan
- 6Q9
- 18 Jan 2020
Not relevent but just wondering if Honor spins off into an independent brand would it still be affected by "The Ban"
- YUKI93
- ibf
- 18 Jan 2020
Nick Tagataka, 18 Jan 2020That's just a rumour started from some random Nokia fan com... moreFor once, I agree with you about that Nokia's JPEG performance - it doesn't look that great. Manual control is where it shines.
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- gRy
- 18 Jan 2020
YUKI93, 18 Jan 2020I hate DxOMark because of their ethics. Nokia once asked Dx... moreThat's just a rumour started from some random Nokia fan community hence has no proof whatsoever. In fact SOOC JPEG from Nokia 9 does look awful, and even though I'm against the idea of giving an "overall" score to each phone, I can still easily see why it did so poorly in their tests.
- ?
- Anonymous
- fIU
- 18 Jan 2020
I have this phone with its latest software. But the pictures are not as great as in the dxomark samples. I have seen better daylight pictures taken by s10 which is according to dxomark is fall behind to this phone. The only one looks great is the night shots. Thats all. Thats why i dont believe dxomark. And i dont get it why people still believe that site. Its look like that they get paid to advertising are true?
And let me ask a question. Why mate 30 pro 5g version has a better score than the non 5g? Software? How its possible if both have a exactly same number of software version?
- L
- Lol
- m1P
- 18 Jan 2020
YUKI93, 18 Jan 2020I hate DxOMark because of their ethics. Nokia once asked Dx... moreCry. As you can even buy a pureview at all. Anyway, it's nice to see some top performance in the lower price bracket.
- YUKI93
- ibf
- 18 Jan 2020
Fayth, 18 Jan 2020people who hate DxOMark, because their phone is not in the ... moreI hate DxOMark because of their ethics. Nokia once asked DxOMark to assess their 9 PureView, but they were asking Nokia for some "funds".
My phone not on the top your bottom.
- YUKI93
- ibf
- 18 Jan 2020
r33fd, 17 Jan 2020Does not have google so it does not exist!Doesn't mean no one can buy one. I owned one, couldn't give a toot about Scroogle spyware. Only people who are heavily dependant on Google like you will only say that. Privacy-minded people wouldn't even think about Google in the first place!
- I
- I'mPhone
- 61%
- 18 Jan 2020
There is an article in Notebookcheck saying you can't rely on DxOMark is irrelevant for camera performance.
- o
- oldmike
- Hq5
- 18 Jan 2020
realitychecker, 18 Jan 2020sour grapes... sour grapes everywhere. if it were say like ... moreUnfortunately just being able to take a good photo does not make the rest of the phone great , and to be sure DXO Mark is not the be all of judging cameras,
it wasn't all that long ago they gave the pixels camera health with glowing praise even though it had the weird lens flares.
no doubt the huawei has good camera, but, I take these reports with a grain of salt.
and I am huawei owner.
- ?
- Anonymous
- fIU
- 18 Jan 2020
I have this phone with its latest software. But the pictures are not as great as in the dxomark samples. I have seen better daylight pictures taken by s10 which is according to dxomark is fall behind to this phone. The only one looks great is the night shots. Thats all. Thats why i dont believe dxomark at all. And i dont get it why people still believe that bs. Its look like that they get paid to advertising are true?
And let me ask a question. Why mate 30 pro 5g version has a better score than the non 5g? Software? How its possible if both have a exactly same number of software version in both phones?
- r
- realitychecker
- I@a
- 18 Jan 2020
sour grapes... sour grapes everywhere. if it were say like a samsung or apple or even xiaomi there, then these fanatics are gonna all round with the praises and boasts...
- ?
- Anonymous
- PZa
- 18 Jan 2020
Fayth, 18 Jan 2020people who hate DxOMark, because their phone is not in the ... moreIs there something you don't like about their methodology? Or do you prefer subjective assessments from youtubers?
- i
- ishreal
- rRT
- 18 Jan 2020
Fayth, 18 Jan 2020people who hate DxOMark, because their phone is not in the ... moreRight lol the moment a Pixel or Samsung phone jumps to the top everyone starts boasting their score. Such hypocrites
- S
- Shui8
- KZK
- 18 Jan 2020
Before bashing, have u guys checkout the samples & the detail explanation? It says it all. Love the RAW noise reduction & details quality using Kirin 990 ISP.
GSMarena review will come out soon, bet its gonna be the same results.
- J
- Justinjt2020
- Hqc
- 18 Jan 2020
M33, 17 Jan 2020mate 30 pro 5g - 123 mate 30 pro -121 Conclusion - 5g ma... moreUpdated software and post processing algorithm which they already stated. At least know your facts befofe you comment!
- J
- Justinjt2020
- Hqc
- 18 Jan 2020
NipponFan, 18 Jan 2020Irrelevant pay to advertise rankings lolRight? So going by that logic why didn't a billion dollar company like Apple who spends an insane amount on marketing not pay for higher scores?!? Or even Samsung for that matter?