Oppo shares the wrong Find X2 weight, offers refunds

18 March 2020
The listed X2 Pro weight was also 10 grams lower than its actual weight.

Sort by:

  • M
  • Mediateksux
  • ypY
  • 22 Mar 2020

DantE O2, 20 Mar 2020so that would mean ufs 3.1 goal is at least 2x write speeds... moreAh yes the art of moving goalposts.

    Shadocx, 19 Mar 2020You know well I meant write speeds... So, are you trying t... moreso that would mean ufs 3.1 goal is at least 2x write speeds of ufs 3.0 still so we will see if they can hit their goal or not in 2nd half of year. some even mentioned write speeds of upto 1200 for it.
    notebook check mentioned average write of ufs 3.0 is 462 anyway.
    and they tested 256kb of data which is a joke and is just theoretical not practical so the link you gave a joke nothing useful
    long way till end of year we got a lot of time for that to arrive.
    and as it might be hard for your brain to process but i am talking about what we want to get by the end of year and you are talking about something of past. LMAO

      DantE O2, 19 Mar 2020write speeds not read. read doesn't matter for recording c... moreYou know well I meant write speeds...
      So, are you trying to say the screenshots are fake?
      The Realme X50 Pro is doing 484 MB/s in Sequential Write with UFS 3.0
      (https://i1.wp.com/www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ufs-3.0-vs-ufs-3.1.jpg?w=800&ssl=1)
      Even the Galaxy Note 10 and Plus are doing 580-590 MB/s with UFS 3.0
      (https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-Note-10-Smartphone-Review-Optimised-SoC-promises-better-runtimes.433424.0.html#toc-performance)
      The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro(https://youtu.be/UZ4QAY-NlNk?t=472) and K30 Pro(https://www.gsmarena.com/redmi_k30_pro_official_render_ufs_31_storage_speed_and_antutu_score_revealed-news-42046.php) are doing 700-800 MB/s in Sequential Write, how is that 3.5 times faster?
      Just because the Honor V30 Pro is slow doesn't mean all phones with UFS 3.0 are slow, LMAO
      You've linked an article that talk about UFS 3.1 but it's probably theorical, the numbers I gave you are from AndroBench etc benchmarks.

        Anonymous, 19 Mar 2020Yeah I checked samples too not just judging by DxOMark scor... moreto my eyes completely different x2 couldn't make accurate colors at all, just ghostly shot colorless pics . and most of the shots were already out of focus or camera was just unable to produce rich texture even without blur setting all images are blurred except for center focus which means camera is totally useless until oppo sends an update and calibrates whole everything then i will take another look to it. to me mate 30 pro had best still images and then mi 10 pro even s20 ultra review on gsmarena had better samples than of those from x2 pro
        that's my idea.

          Shadocx, 19 Mar 2020Did you check the link I've sent you? The IQOO 3 has UFS 3... morewrite speeds not read. read doesn't matter for recording
          current 3.1 has reached already 3.5x of ufs 3.0 write speeds as in k30 pro vs v30 pro read gsmarena article about that. but there is coming more ahead,
          https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-ufs-3-1-storage-1093449/
          1gb write speeds is the goal but like i said we shall in practice that which wipes ufs 3.0 out of competition and by far

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • Kxr
            • 19 Mar 2020

            DantE O2, 19 Mar 2020you can live with numbers i don't care . i compare the came... moreYeah I checked samples too not just judging by DxOMark score.
            Look at those samples. They compared the Find X2 Pro vs Mate 30 pro vs Mi 10 Pro.

            Mate 30 pro had the worst and most unnatural color rendition.
            Find X2 pro had the most color accurate images.
            Excellent dynamic range. A little noise visible but that is after pixel peeping.

            Main and Ultrawide sensors produce similar images irrespective of lighting conditions which most manufacturers can't brag about.

            Best Autofocus on the market.

            Plus it has better zoom camera than Huawei but inferior to Galaxy s20 ultra telephoto in low light. (although low light through telephoto can be fixed in the future with gcam. Not possible on the Huawei).
            Video recording is better than Mate 30 pro but slightly inferior to the Galaxy s20 series.

              DantE O2, 19 Mar 2020ufs 3.1 is supposed to be upto 3x faster in write speeds. w... moreDid you check the link I've sent you?
              The IQOO 3 has UFS 3.1 and is slower than the Realme X50 Pro with optimized UFS 3.0.
              The IQOO could be faster if the X50 Pro wasn't optimized but barely.
              3x times faster reads? Where did you see that? maybe it was a different file system(F2FS, ext4 etc.).

                Shadocx, 19 Mar 2020Going from UFS 3.0 to 3.1 doesn't seem like a big improveme... moreufs 3.1 is supposed to be upto 3x faster in write speeds. with all these super cameras on these phones more write speed is always superior but we can't know the exact real world speeds until we see it in action.

                  Anonymous, 19 Mar 2020The camera is on par with Samsung, even better in many case... moreyou can live with numbers i don't care . i compare the camera samples and what you say is completely wrong in real world shots even based on shots from dxo itself. camera is inferior by far from mate 30 pro shots even . everyone can go and see the shots instead of blindly talking about numbers

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • Kxr
                    • 19 Mar 2020

                    DantE O2, 18 Mar 2020it's still 3 seasons remaining until end of year would be s... moreThe camera is on par with Samsung, even better in many cases.
                    Huawei hasn't even released the p40 pro.
                    Xiaomi and Oppo both got equal scores by DxOMark.

                      DantE O2, 18 Mar 2020it's still 3 seasons remaining until end of year would be s... moreGoing from UFS 3.0 to 3.1 doesn't seem like a big improvement to me compared to going from 2.1 to 3.0.
                      The versions speak for themselves and this image too:
                      https://i1.wp.com/www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ufs-3.0-vs-ufs-3.1.jpg?w=800&ssl=1

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • KZK
                        • 18 Mar 2020

                        DantE O2, 18 Mar 2020phone of the year? lmao probably you are talking about 2019... mores20 already set a benchmark for other oem.. and this phone really can go side by side with s20 series. . & yet this phone might be better then exynos s20 counterpart.

                          Anonymous, 18 Mar 2020Which phone will be competition? Can't expect anything ne... moreit's still 3 seasons remaining until end of year would be stupid to pick something as best of the year now. about anything.
                          samsung huawei xiaomi all have better camera by far at this moment when i compare the sample shots. there will be probably ufs 3.1 storages later this year which is actually whole lot better than ufs 3.0 and about chipsets we can wait and see whole lot time remaining.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • Kxr
                            • 18 Mar 2020

                            DantE O2, 18 Mar 2020phone of the year? lmao probably you are talking about 2019... moreWhich phone will be competition?
                            Can't expect anything new or game changing from Apple and Pixel.
                            Samsung came with lot of hype but didn't live up to it.
                            Huawei struggling with 2019 chipset and lack of Google Play services /availability in general.
                            Xperia nothing special, too overpriced and lack of availability.

                            Which phone will be competition?


                              Anonymous, 18 Mar 2020No one cares if their phone is 5-10 grams heavier. I doubt... morephone of the year? lmao probably you are talking about 2019 as there's a long way till 20 ends and there will come phones with much better performance along the way.

                                • A
                                • Anon
                                • XPM
                                • 18 Mar 2020

                                tigerbomb1996, 18 Mar 2020meanwhile apple: you're holding it wrong!Your hand is weighted 10 grams more! It's not the phone! :rofl:

                                  Lol nice Campaign..!

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • Kxr
                                    • 18 Mar 2020

                                    No one cares if their phone is 5-10 grams heavier.
                                    I doubt anyone took that refund.

                                    Although, I don't think many would buy Find X2.
                                    The Find X2 pro on the other hand is phone of the year contender.

                                      Jesus Christ... Offering refunds for listing the wrong weight..

                                        meanwhile apple: you're holding it wrong!