Motorola Edge+ does competitive videos, good photos according to DxOMark

02 June 2020
The Edge+ video score puts it in competition with the likes of iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy S20 Ultra. The still camera is closer to 2019 flagships.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • mJs
  • 03 Jun 2020

Any phone above 1000$ needs to bring at least 120 in dxomark score.

    AnonD-832645, 02 Jun 2020You can googling that dxo is a mess and not trustworthy, ma... moreIMO I'll trust DxO based on their testing but with my own opinions based off the sample images. To me, while their testing isn't truly real world usage they still do a good job at testing and the fact they compare it to some other phones do help.

      • B
      • Bogdan
      • p%B
      • 03 Jun 2020

      Still, in Europe this will sell at 1250EUR.
      Good luck with that come back Motorola.

        • J
        • James
        • KA1
        • 03 Jun 2020

        Well. Just because you don't like Motorola, you say DXO is a mess. There are too many blogs these days and people can write about anything about anyone. Even you can a guy paid by a brand to spread negative comments about brands like Motorola.

          • Y
          • Yeah.
          • rKa
          • 03 Jun 2020

          Nothing New, 02 Jun 2020Because companies pay dxomark to give them high score so th... moreIf the brand that you like get a good score then you don't have a problem, but if a brand that you don't like get a good score, then all of a sudden the blogger becomes biased.

            • J
            • James
            • rKa
            • 03 Jun 2020

            AnonD-832645, 02 Jun 2020You can googling that dxo is a mess and not trustworthy, ma... moreYeah. They did provide good score for cheap brands like MI, Realme, Vivo, Oppe and Oneplus

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • 0p}
              • 03 Jun 2020

              If someone here is from China, talk on weibo to Digital Chat Station ( he always posts info about chinese phones) and ask him about how dxo test works.



                DxOMark is a reliable source for information before deciding which phone to buy, but this does not mean their review are 100 percent accurate, sometimes their scoring system doesn't applies to real life scenarios .

                The claims of DxOMark is biased increased recently after some of the top phones manufacturers with a large fan base did not score will in the DxOMark ranking,

                  • N
                  • NiJon
                  • nQe
                  • 02 Jun 2020

                  Anonymous, 02 Jun 2020Why is there always such a gap between gsma camera verdicts... moreBecause GSMArena is closer to 'real world' usage, whereas DxO Mark is in sterile conditions

                    • D
                    • AnonD-832645
                    • U}}
                    • 02 Jun 2020

                    Anonymous, 02 Jun 2020Why is there always such a gap between gsma camera verdicts... moreYou can googling that dxo is a mess and not trustworthy, many people know that. But strangely gsmarena always make news about dxo. If dxo publish new benchmark, its 100% there is an article about it here

                      Anonymous, 02 Jun 2020Why is there always such a gap between gsma camera verdicts... moreBenchmark standards don't always translate to the same thing in real life, so we always take them with a pinch of salt.

                        Anonymous, 02 Jun 2020Why is there always such a gap between gsma camera verdicts... moreBecause companies pay dxomark to give them high score so they can use it to advertise their cameras , dxomark isn't trustworthy anymore
                        And here are some examples : p40 pro is best for video,
                        S20 ultra is better than s20 plus

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • 7Ae
                          • 02 Jun 2020

                          Why is there always such a gap between gsma camera verdicts compared to dxo mark? This happens so often that multiple reviewers will say the camera isn't great and dxo will give it a crazy high score or the opposite happens. I get it's subjective to an extent.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • P@Y
                            • 02 Jun 2020

                            Anonymous, 02 Jun 2020Reviewers don't get money from the smartphone companies (or... moreAdds is not enough to earn money.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • P@Y
                              • 02 Jun 2020

                              nepu.bug, 02 Jun 2020If I recall correctly then Moto is known for providing slow... moreWhat is the use of updates if you upgrade your phone each year? Indians are the only people in the world the is addict on OS updates.

                                If I recall correctly then Moto is known for providing slow updates. In a sea of many other better options, I'm not going for this phone.

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • Njb
                                  • 02 Jun 2020

                                  Nick Tagataka, 02 Jun 2020Yeah, DxOMark is not a charity group. Of course they demand... moreReviewers don't get money from the smartphone companies (or at least they shouldn't) they get money from ads

                                    [deleted post]Yeah, DxOMark is not a charity group. Of course they demand money when they test phones.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • P@Y
                                      • 02 Jun 2020

                                      [deleted post]Let see after a year now, if they will join HTC in grave or just like the Vertu brand.

                                        Motorola making a very good comeback... Better than the iPhone 11 Pro max... Great.