Early benchmarks show that  Mobile Safari got faster with iOS 6

12 June, 2012
The JavaScript performance has improved, but also compatibility with HTML 5 and CSS 3.

Sort by:

  • J
  • Jackskellington6sic6
  • Y6v
  • 15 Jun 2012

roshan, 13 Jun 2012no one can beat apple..iphone rocks...s3 n samsung jst 2 wo... moreYeah. Now try actually using a smart phone because commenting on a site about them

    • J
    • Jackskellington6sic6
    • Y6v
    • 15 Jun 2012

    Manyuken, 13 Jun 2012Flash is dead, long live HTML5. That's an excuse because you don't have it. In the meantime while many things are still flash and it's very usuable. All Droids will have HTML5 when they need it

      • s
      • serial bar
      • 3Ax
      • 14 Jun 2012

      Professor Farnsworth, 12 Jun 2012Good news, everone! They DO have as many bluetooths as the... moreprof farns sounds more like a bender. if u know what i mean...pun intended.

        • M
        • Manyuken
        • L7E
        • 13 Jun 2012

        faisolbau, 13 Jun 2012does it support flash ?Flash is dead, long live HTML5.

          • r
          • roshan
          • P$u
          • 13 Jun 2012

          no one can beat apple..iphone rocks...s3 n samsung jst 2 words for u suck it :P

            • D
            • AnonD-57211
            • YTZ
            • 13 Jun 2012

            AnonD-53748, 12 Jun 2012I don't really hate the iPhone but I just like how Apple is... morehmm, i don't really hate Apple itself but what i do hate in Apple are their darn restrictions and high prices. your point is perfect mate.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • kg3
              • 13 Jun 2012

              Anonymous, 13 Jun 2012Why are you arguing about Bluetooth when iOS has a ton of o... moreiOS has weather in the notification bar and you can ask siri for weather too. Have you never touch an iPhone?

                • f
                • faisolbau
                • y$h
                • 13 Jun 2012

                does it support flash ?

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • jyA
                  • 13 Jun 2012

                  jackskellington6sic6, 13 Jun 2012Wow....obviously that person was incorrect. All iPhones hav... moreWhy are you arguing about Bluetooth when iOS has a ton of other problems to take care of? As in a better interface or widgets. Like weather. We don't want an app for that.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • IWY
                    • 13 Jun 2012

                    AnonD-53748, 12 Jun 2012Naws, Samsung is the McLaren, Koenigsegg or Bugatti of phones.Actually its no coincidence that being Korean and espousing the same values, Samsung is the Kia, Daewoo, or even Samsung of phones lol.

                      • P
                      • Professor Farnsworth
                      • qbn
                      • 13 Jun 2012

                      AnonD-53748, 12 Jun 2012Well we can wait until iPhone 5 comes out. :)Indeed; Samsung has some fine processors, and their past browser optimizations have been impressive - should be interesting to see how(/if?) the next iPhone stacks up.

                        • j
                        • jackskellington6sic6
                        • 4QS
                        • 13 Jun 2012

                        AnonD-53748, 12 Jun 2012Well we can wait until iPhone 5 comes out. :)It will be 5S, 6, or something else. The window for 5 went with 4S

                          • j
                          • jackskellington6sic6
                          • 4QS
                          • 13 Jun 2012

                          Professor Farnsworth, 12 Jun 2012Oh my no. I think you'll actually find I mocked a ridiculo... moreWow....obviously that person was incorrect. All iPhones have Bluetooth, but inaccuracy in response to inaccuracy. It was a simple statement nothing more. I also love how I haven't said anything bad about you, but multiple times I've been labled....nice......we are both of topic so its irrelevant of you to peg that on me. You corrected something off topic as did I. Like I said Bluetooth was not made to restrict. There is no excuse for it that period. I never implied anything else towards you or apple except the Bluetooth matter. Lets here the next rant now

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • fqn
                            • 13 Jun 2012

                            Do you all realise that Safari and IE are the easiest and quickest to hack? Nobody bothers though.

                              • D
                              • AnonD-53748
                              • syb
                              • 12 Jun 2012

                              harlekkin, 12 Jun 2012You get what you pay for. Apple is more than just an iPhone... moreNaws, Samsung is the McLaren, Koenigsegg or Bugatti of phones.

                                • D
                                • AnonD-53748
                                • syb
                                • 12 Jun 2012

                                Professor Farnsworth, 12 Jun 2012A phone that just launched is faster than a phone launched ... moreWell we can wait until iPhone 5 comes out. :)

                                  • P
                                  • Professor Farnsworth
                                  • qbn
                                  • 12 Jun 2012

                                  jackskellington6sic6, 12 Jun 2012Coming from the person also responding off topic. So if it ... moreOh my no. I think you'll actually find I mocked a ridiculous response, pointed out its inaccuracy, and noted it as OT. When you chose to respond seriously (as fanboys are noted to do), having yourself made erroneous assumptions, I marked the the error in your rebuttal and again indicated it as off topic. Perplexingly, this has yet again incurred an incorrect and off-topic reply. Apples seem do all they claim on the box, thus they've squeezed in precisely as many Bluetooths as necessary. If the box listed more profiles, that would require more Bluetooths, and if it again worked as advertised they would still have included precisely as many Bluetooths as necessary. The mere concept of /too many/ Bluetooths is preposterous! And still, this has nothing to do with the article, or comments, or replies to comments... To shreds I say!

                                    • j
                                    • jackskellington6sic6
                                    • q8Q
                                    • 12 Jun 2012

                                    Professor Farnsworth, 12 Jun 2012Good news, everone! They DO have as many bluetooths as the... morePS I wasn't making this a fanboy war. Just simply corrected an incorrect statement. And now I'm the insecure fanboy. Hmmmm

                                      • j
                                      • jackskellington6sic6
                                      • q8Q
                                      • 12 Jun 2012

                                      Karlo, 12 Jun 2012I will say this once and for all!! Iphone is an Iphone and... moreAgreed

                                        • j
                                        • jackskellington6sic6
                                        • q8Q
                                        • 12 Jun 2012

                                        Professor Farnsworth, 12 Jun 2012Good news, everone! They DO have as many bluetooths as the... moreComing from the person also responding off topic. So if it had full Bluetooth access all along would you say they have too much? I don't think so. Yet because apple limits something that had been around for long before and was open for anything that supports it that's all it needs..because that's all your given. I see.