Canon unveils EOS R5 with 45MP full-frame sensor and 8K RAW video recording
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 15 Jul 2020
Real.Talk, 14 Jul 2020Okay, you win but Apples' proprietary jail ecosystem d... moreIt is not about winning or losing, all I did was stating how things work.
And I dont understand what - jail ecosystem - means. Not being able to sideload apps? Not being able to crack apps that are pay-to-use? Not being able to alter the UI? Those are not jail.
- R
- Real.Talk
- 0FU
- 14 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 14 Jul 2020That extra detail without proper colour rendition is, as me... moreOkay, you win but Apples' proprietary jail ecosystem does not ;)
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 14 Jul 2020
Real.Talk, 14 Jul 2020Now you do have a point in what you're saying but a la... moreThat extra detail without proper colour rendition is, as mentioned below, useful to quantity-over-quality "photographers". Great pictures are not made out of sharpness and detail alone; colour rendition, composition, and contrast/micro-contrast are the aspects that actually matter in photography. Everything else is a 'nice-to-have' but it's at the bottom of the priority list when choosing a camera.
- R
- Real.Talk
- pk$
- 14 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 14 Jul 2020"why do pro photographer and paparazzi only use DSLR&#... moreNow you do have a point in what you're saying but a larger sensor will capture more detail and that's the main difference between mobile sensors and dedicated ones.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 14 Jul 2020
Real.Talk, 14 Jul 2020Just because you didn't mention " mobile snapper ... more"why do pro photographer and paparazzi only use DSLR's exclusively?"
Old habits. Paparazzos - all they need is a zoom lens that they can operate quickly, so they will use a dslr. Zooming in through a touch screen is not as fast or as easy as using a zoom lens. Paparazzos, sports, event photographers etc mostly use zoom lenses because they need to be able to quickly switch between wide and tele, depending on where the action is. But they do not care about colour accuracy, noise, and other imperfections. And they are not true photographers anyway, they are just tools that freeze the moment in order to be published for a few days in some magazine or news site.
True photographers care about colour accuracy, colour science, composition, subject, meaning, message, capturing exactly what they see, and sometimes slightly adjusted to emphasise something in their picture. Whereas sports, events, paparazzos and so on, only need to look for sharpness, how many shots the camera buffer holds, and how many shots per second they can take. These are 'quantity over quality' tools.
But want to capture natural-looking skin tones? Want to capture coloured lights, reflections, neon glow at night, landscapes that look great straight out of the camera and only require very minor adjustments? Yeah, these guys can't really do it with their gear, and don't even care or need to care about these things. These 'tool photographers' are a dime a dozen, as it's incredibly easy to set everything to 'automatic' and shoot hundreds of photos in a matter of seconds, hoping you've snapped something usable.
Your question kind of sounds like (an analogy) "if most professional drivers usually drive trucks, lorries, vans, etc. that means trucks, lorries, vans, etc. are better than normal cars". Yeap... right...
- R
- Real.Talk
- 3Zy
- 14 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 13 Jul 2020I didn't say "mobile snappers", I mentioned ... moreJust because you didn't mention " mobile snapper " doesn't mean an iPhone or any other mobile device with a camera isn't one as they are exactly all just that but apparently you don't understand that and think an iPhone is an all in one glorious tool surpassing every other technology out there lol
Oh and by the way, why do pro photographer and paparazzi only use DSLR's exclusively? Millions of photographers out there and their choice is always DSLR.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mE0
- 13 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 13 Jul 2020I didn't say "mobile snappers", I mentioned ... moreiPhone is a mobile and has a camera, so it's a mobile snapper .
And mobiles still don't come close to resolved detail, regardless of setup, location, subject.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 13 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 12 Jul 2020You’re either dreaming or on something, even my old 1Dmk2 w... moreI didn't say "mobile snappers", I mentioned iPhone. And what you say was true up until 2-3 years ago. Not anymore. (unless you are doing product photography or other types of static photography in controlled environments)
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 13 Jul 2020
Stan, 11 Jul 2020And yet my wife's latest iphone takes worse pictures t... moreYeap, it had that feature but it is slow and unusable in real life unless you are shooting landscape with no foliage and no wind. Whereas image stacking in my iPhone X works instantly and also works with MOVING subjects. Try doing that with a dslr!
Next!
- R
- Real.Talk
- 3Zy
- 12 Jul 2020
DSLR's are barely reaching 45MP and we got gimmicks like 108MP cameras on smartphones when the logical step would be to advance the long recycled 12MP sensor into a 24MP one.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mE0
- 12 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 11 Jul 2020lol my iPhone X takes better photos than this 20mpx sensor.... moreYou’re either dreaming or on something, even my old 1Dmk2 would crap on mobile snappers
- ?
- Anonymous
- 39f
- 11 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 11 Jul 2020lol my iPhone X takes better photos than this 20mpx sensor.... moreStraight out from camera maybe, but with editing this camera blow your iPhone out of the water
- S
- Stan
- 4$P
- 11 Jul 2020
Anonymous, 11 Jul 2020lol my iPhone X takes better photos than this 20mpx sensor.... moreAnd yet my wife's latest iphone takes worse pictures than my DSLR from 2015.
Maybe its just you, who doesn't know how to use a proper camera?
Speaking of image stacking - my DSLR from 2009 already had that feature, but it is never a replacement for a much better sensor, and a photographer, who knows how to use his camera.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m5g
- 11 Jul 2020
lol my iPhone X takes better photos than this 20mpx sensor. Mainly due to image stacking and processing that this semi-"professional" camera doesn't have. Unless they come up with a Foveon-like sensor that captures real colour, there is no point to have yet another average quality output camera around.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7Ac
- 11 Jul 2020
Daaaamnit, 10 Jul 2020Seriously, what's the use of this kind of waste when y... moreJust here with my marshmallow with all these roasts 😂
- T
- T M
- 0fW
- 10 Jul 2020
Daaaamnit, 10 Jul 2020Seriously, what's the use of this kind of waste when y... moreHahahahaha, you have no idea what you're talking about. Log off forever, clown.
- A
- Alex
- 64h
- 10 Jul 2020
Daaaamnit, 10 Jul 2020Seriously, what's the use of this kind of waste when y... moreAnd yet, not one of those 48/64/108 MP phones can come close to this (or any other) 20 MP camera, when it comes to photography. Not even to $400 entry level cameras. Interesting, ain't it?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0V7
- 10 Jul 2020
Daaaamnit, 10 Jul 2020Seriously, what's the use of this kind of waste when y... moreWhy don't you ask a professional photographer.
This isn't meant for you.
- vrvly
- g5f
- 10 Jul 2020
Even though they could put ff/medium format sensor to apsc camera body and 6" screen instead of 3. Viewfinder is also spec from pre-electronic era, when screens weren't. At least I don't see any reason to have it big and useless based on my usage.
But unlike smartphones, there is not enough competition and upgrades in comparison... cannot expect more.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 61}
- 10 Jul 2020
Daaaamnit, 10 Jul 2020Seriously, what's the use of this kind of waste when y... moreLol what? U’re comparing not even an inch sensor with full frame sensor? With the MP count as the parameter? U’re drunk bro?