Samsung details the ISOCELL HM3 - the 108 MP sensor used in the Galaxy S21 Ultra
- P
- P C M
- 6p}
- 16 Jan 2021
AnonD-923722, 15 Jan 2021Then can you explain the more noisy footage of the samsung ... moreVery simple answer. Better ISP.
A14 SoC is new and Exynos 990 is 1 year older.
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- Xpf
- 16 Jan 2021
Shui8, 16 Jan 2021Honestly, mark my words, S21 Ultra will snatch the top spot... moreCould you give me the link of a website you saw the samples from S21 Ultra? I'd like to see them too. Thanks.
- S
- Shui8
- KZK
- 16 Jan 2021
AnonD-923722, 16 Jan 2021It doesn't have OIS Neither my Honor 8 Pro, Mate 20 & P40 as well.
- YUKI93
- ibX
- 16 Jan 2021
AnonD-923722, 16 Jan 2021It doesn't have OIS That is true. Sony never put OIS on their smartphone camera until the introduction of Xperia 1 in 2019. The only time they put OIS was on the XA Ultra, XA1 Ultra, and the XA2 Ultra but that was on the front camera.
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- Xpf
- 16 Jan 2021
Shanti Dope, 15 Jan 2021Is he really hating on Samsung in any way? The OP is merely... moreI've seen him calling Samsung "copycat" once and using the same term to describe Chinese companies multiple times in a mildly sinophobic context as well (though most of them got removed by GSMA's moderation team), so I know that whenever he uses the term "copy" it carries a negative connotation.
- YUKI93
- ibX
- 16 Jan 2021
Aierlan, 16 Jan 2021Definitely weaker than Hm1. It's basically the same ap... moreTrue that. Really not impressed with the new 0.7µm Samsung sensor. The pixel size is smaller than what Samsung offered for HM1 and HMX. 0.1µm difference may doesn't sound like a lot, but put it under Quad or Nona Bayer pixel binning and it really shows smaller effective pixel pitch size.
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- Xpf
- 16 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 15 Jan 2021Xiaomi is using HM2 for mi11. Not same sensor. It's HMX, not HM2.
- D
- AnonD-923722
- tDQ
- 16 Jan 2021
Shui8, 16 Jan 2021The problem with Sony Z series is, 20/23mp output looks lik... moreIt doesn't have OIS
- 3
- 34SciencePigeon
- a3H
- 16 Jan 2021
If findable, 16/512 is a good option which worth stay next to 12 pro max 6/512.
A good combination of both exclusivity in their stores for the next 7 years.
- S
- Shui8
- KZK
- 16 Jan 2021
tehyadro, 16 Jan 2021With all these improvements and still it wont get first pla... moreHonestly, mark my words, S21 Ultra will snatch the top spot on DxOMark. Samples I saw are amazing, more mature image processing than previous Samsung. Possibly the best 3x & 10x optical zoom as well (where DxO points are taken). The best part? Samsung looks like finally use Super Res algorithm in between FL, provide higher quality details (maybe from SD888 ISP).
But lets not forget, P50 are coming out soon.
- tehyadro
- svM
- 16 Jan 2021
With all these improvements and still it wont get first place in Dxochinamark.
- YUKI93
- ibX
- 16 Jan 2021
Wezz, 15 Jan 2021Samsung is pushing the bar very high, Samsung's 108 Mp... moreWell not exactly since this particular 108MP sensor is limited to Samsung only. The rest of smartphone brands still prefer to use a Sony sensor, particularly Huawei and Vivo.
- S
- Shui8
- KZK
- 16 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 15 Jan 2021Downsample.
Size of 5MP, details of 40MP.
Same trick us... moreThe problem with Sony Z series is, 20/23mp output looks like 10mp while the downsample 8/12mp looks like 5mp, image processing with bunch of artifacts & oversharpening details. Own bunch of them before.
My older Honor 8 Pro smaller sensor at 12mp provide much much better resolution details, let alone later on my Mate 20 (better than Honor 8 Pro, stretch more gap than Xperia Z) which has same sensor size as Xperia Z series.
Now currently on my P40, hands down near to none oversharpening with near noise free output. Details are plenty, of course because of the big 1/1.28" sensor size. Really really happy everytime shooting with it.
- A
- Aierlan
- g05
- 16 Jan 2021
AnonD-923722, 16 Jan 2021YeahThere's no imx682 or imx686 sensor in that so your point makes no sense. Judging a camera off that test is not the wisest in any case there is such a small sample of images and none in true lowlight and no people pics in indoor situations. Watch some of the more comprehensive tests. There are plenty of them available e.g. Han's Tech Talk, technology Jock, Gadgets 360 to name a few
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- Xpf
- 16 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 15 Jan 2021Imx689 is capable of 12bit. Oppo does not offer it. Nor... moreOppo uses 12-bit RAW output compatible IMX689 for Find X2 Pro and they state the feature on the product spec sheet.
- D
- AnonD-923722
- tDP
- 16 Jan 2021
Aierlan, 16 Jan 2021Are you referring to his blind test? If so then name the ph... moreYeah
- SuuperBaka
- q}I
- 16 Jan 2021
Wezz, 15 Jan 2021Samsung is pushing the bar very high, Samsung's 108 Mp... moreNice Joke
- A
- Aierlan
- gk1
- 16 Jan 2021
AnonD-923722, 16 Jan 2021Yup there is. The 0.8 micron sized Pixels 64 MP compared to... moreAre you referring to his blind test? If so then name the phone with 64mp imx682.
- A
- Aierlan
- v7Q
- 16 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 16 Jan 2021Buddy Samsung themselves said it is successor to HM1. Successor in time and number but not in specifications. It is designed to be more compact but not better. You only have to see the specs.
- D
- AnonD-923722
- Kxf
- 16 Jan 2021
Aierlan, 16 Jan 2021He didn't even include an imx682 sensor in his compari... moreYup there is. The 0.8 micron sized Pixels 64 MP compared to the 108 MP 0.7 micron pixels sized. The 108MP does better weirdly in lowlight, even though the pixel size is smaller than the 64 MP one