Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 appears on Geekbench
- ?
- Anonymous
- ptx
- 28 Jan 2021
Exynos 850 (8 x A55 cores). The performance is comparable to the Exynos 7885 from the Xcover 4s.
Not for gaming not for heavy apps. Good for phonecalls and some browsing. Use 1 app at a time.
I did own the xcover 4 it was not a bad device.
But one cant expect much for so little money .
- V
- VaruLV
- Tts
- 27 Jan 2021
Probably another phone with sub par camera and exorbitant price for its components.
Yeah, youll probably get more lax warranty claim procedures in case yours gets dropped and breaks, but, aside from that and one extra button and somewhat glove friendliness its still gona be overpriced IP68 phone with shit camera.
Proper rugged phone with flagship grade cameras, now that would be great!
- R
- Rhyne Weisse
- nYT
- 26 Jan 2021
It would be a STEAL a phone that would be rugged and flagship to be honest.
I WANT to see something like the mythic Galaxy Sx Active!
- ?
- Anonymous
- BI9
- 26 Jan 2021
The point is that its a work phone, not a flagship. Its kinda like how workplaces give Iphones to workers, the phone is basically useless unless your using it for company. But it has enough to push through. If your not into budget/rough and tumble phones, then I'd be weary.
- ?
- Anonymous
- tSm
- 26 Jan 2021
What is with the stigma of putting low rams on phones like these? Do they assume only first responders buy these?
All the wasted resources like 8gb ram etc on their countless hipster same same models. smh