Xiaomi and Oppo's in-house 5G chipsets may arrive this year
- a
- a
- UD{
- 12 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 12 Apr 2021there is no one company in the world has completely full ec... morethis is an open world you can make your own if you want. create your own app store and apps as well. enjoy codding.
- ?
- Anonymous
- QdP
- 12 Apr 2021
blue.sun, 09 Apr 2021This, however, does not work. Huawei was completely origina... morethere is no one company in the world has completely full ecosystem of original design manufacture OS building with their own patents，even samsung or apple,but it will be the trend
- E
- Enki
- vjP
- 12 Apr 2021
Unlikely before 2023
- M
- Mslucy
- nQ1
- 11 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2021So who do we/one trust?That's a really good question yes, but US I really don't believe in, China the same.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%V
- 11 Apr 2021
ericwang, 10 Apr 2021There are lots of way to slove patten problem,although some... moreCorrect. What you described, is a simply bully tactic by using China's population as leverage. However, you're pretty wrong on others: Qualcomm has many customers, the 3 vendor you listed aren't even their largest client. They made it even before the Chinese vendor start making mobile phones, they'll continue to do so - just at lower revenue. Exynos isn't doing that great as you claim. In fact, they're even behind Mediatek in market shares. Samsung, probably paying more for Qualcomm than its own Exynos for two reason:
1. Most Exynos makes to the mid to lower end of the mobile phones. Hence, majority are the cheaper Exynos.
2. For the high-end Exynos, that selected market. And the biggest selected market is mostly EMEA. While Snapdragon still goes to their high-end lines in US and Asia (including Korea for current gen), which still beat the EMEA market in sales.
And being the giant of Qualcomm, they do have large patent pool. They don't even necessary need to sell actual chip to make money. Just like the 3 vendor you mention, are mostly likely still paying US$ 2 per device patent to Microsoft, as many Android phone vendors do.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%V
- 10 Apr 2021
Mslucy, 10 Apr 2021Hopefully not US, because who trust this country? Money an... moreSo who do we/one trust?
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%V
- 10 Apr 2021
TechHunter, 10 Apr 2021Than you not understand how Copyrights work in Asia and mos... moreDon't need to. There's international law need to be compliance here when the criteria are meet. China just gotten to the stage that, when it really matters and hurts them, they simply ignore it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%V
- 10 Apr 2021
ericwang, 10 Apr 2021Then you should know lots of Taiwanese who formly work in T... moreAnd yet Samsung still the not on hand-to-hand level with TSMC, and more want to China at the time, till company/government aware and stop red-tapping from loosing talent pool. What point are you trying to make?
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%V
- 10 Apr 2021
Zoser, 09 Apr 2021You are wrong, Huawei is not completely original. Their Ki... moreWay too high hopes on the RISC-V, as so do many Chinese see as option out. But two things:
1. RISC-V isn't mature enough on desktop, never mind mobile.
2. Software eco - Limited Linux distro support, mostly see adoption on BSD due the RISC-V's own market presence. As long as you don't make it easy for end-user on OS-level, you'll not see shift in developer focus.
RISC, has it pros and cons. It will not be able to outpace x86-64 easily. For all it intend and purpose, RISC has being on the market before along Intel, AMD and Cyrix. It didn't workout, just like many tech giant fall under history, and I don't see it miraculously being a solution for the x86-64 patent issue just because RISC-V is open-source design.
- M
- Mslucy
- nQ1
- 10 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 09 Apr 2021Well they have employees of tsmc and Samsung semiconductors... moreMaybe yes, but you can't be that old.
I remember lots of industral espionage in my many years in this sick world and absolutely also from US etc, so it's not just China... Please open ur eys for god sake. 😳
- M
- Mslucy
- nQ1
- 10 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 09 Apr 2021So, lots of money putting in. Whoes going validate the sec... moreHopefully not US, because who trust this country?
Money and war is the only things they know about.
- e
- ericwang
- tad
- 10 Apr 2021
blue.sun, 09 Apr 2021This, however, does not work. Huawei was completely origina... moreThere are lots of way to slove patten problem,although some of them may be thought as rude by western.
For example,the biggest customer of Meditek and Qualcomm are three Chinese comapnies,Xiaomi,OPPO (including Oneplus and Realme) and Vivo.(Samsung have own in house chip).If they make an agreement that Qualcomm should let them use some Qualcomm's patten(maybe they will pay some money) or all of them wont buy yhe Qualcomm's chip anymore,what will Qualcomm do?
In China,it called the 'use market trade the technology',which already use in highspeed train and car industry
- e
- ericwang
- tad
- 10 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2021If you buy something stolen, you are commiting crime as well. Then you should know lots of Taiwanese who formly work in TSMC join Samsung Semi to help them catch up the TSMC since 14LPE.
- k
- knightfurry
- syN
- 10 Apr 2021
blue.sun, 09 Apr 2021This, however, does not work. Huawei was completely origina... morei don't know about oppo but xiaomi has made isp for image processor and mobile chip called surge1 so i suppose xiaomi have it
- T
- TechHunter
- nmM
- 10 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2021If you buy something stolen, you are commiting crime as well. Than you not understand how Copyrights work in Asia and most important in China, so not be lazy and read law of China copyright.
- ?
- Anonymous
- K5R
- 10 Apr 2021
Zoser, 09 Apr 2021A significant number of companies have already been working... moreAgree
Well Said
Thumbs Up
- ?
- Anonymous
- LkB
- 10 Apr 2021
Anonymous, 09 Apr 2021Except BOE never stole it. Koreans working for Samsung sold it.If you buy something stolen, you are commiting crime as well.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LkB
- 10 Apr 2021
https://youtu.be/QItgZQzYPJg
To those that blame SD888 for xiaomi mi11 heat.
Iqoo7, s21 ultra and x60 pro+ running on much lower temperature than mi11 ...
- Z
- Zoser
- 847
- 10 Apr 2021
blue.sun, 09 Apr 2021This, however, does not work. Huawei was completely origina... moreYou are wrong and i explained it on other post but is pending of be approved by a moderator. Anyways Kirin SoC for example is not original completely. Use ARM architecture that they must license to ARM Ltd. So only due to that you are wrong.
U.S.A. can't forbit ARM to license to Huawei but Huawei depends of the U.S.A. technology to manufacture their phone is several ways. The bans came from there. For example TSMC use U.S.A technology and machinery to manufacture Kirin processors... And the USA prohibited TSMC from manufacturing components for Huawei. And a large, etc.
At the beginning even Intel and AMD where prohibited to do business with Huawei. So no Intel processors repair their server or build new ones. No access to buy RAM memories, etc. So they stocked as mach components as possible with the hope that things change later. But for now U.S.A only allow sell them old technology based on U.S.A patents.