Oppo details the rigorous testing of its smartphones

29 April 2022
By simulating years of daily wear and tear and accidents, Oppo ensures that it's phones are built to last.

Sort by:

  • A
  • Akhili
  • YQ}
  • 02 May 2022

Compare to f 9 pro camera f21 pro 4g model camera 😑😭😭😭😭
Front camera night vision back camera zoom mode 😂😭😭😭😭
Only the thing is amoled,speaker,micro cam.
I own this model.
Well any way buy before you must visit oppo showroom.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • nmM
    • 01 May 2022

    Wish they'd spent as much effort in testing the software side. ColorOS is such a buggy mess.

      RejZoR, 29 Apr 2022This internal testing is nothing new. Any serious company d... moreThey will still charge us premium over the material. For example, aluminum frame would cost maybe $30 more to produce but the phone companies will raise the price by 100. So manufacturers will keep using aluminum and create a illusion that aluminum is premium while plastic is not and try to justify the $100 raise.

        Anurag , 30 Apr 2022Bullshit....it seems a propoganda. I have used an OPPO flag... moreThe problem is, these chinese non-brands can't match established brands in terms of quality. Maybe those offer some extra features (most of them gimmick), build quality is something different.

          DBZSUPER , 30 Apr 2022Testing in snow is good due hardwares acceleration during h... moreSpot on

            • c
            • cyber
            • S2D
            • 30 Apr 2022

            oneplus 10 pro tells a different story,otherwise samsung has the best quality of water resistance tapes meshes and so on,apple is second,the other wanna be something chinese junk brands like oppo and xiaomi just have false advertising

              • D
              • DBZSUPER
              • rUp
              • 30 Apr 2022

              Testing in snow is good due hardwares acceleration during heavily usage because it generates a lot of heat. Coldness helps keeping the temperature down. Only people don't know tech think it is awesome. I'm not impressed at all.

                • D
                • AnonD-731363
                • SH3
                • 30 Apr 2022

                looks interesting but i still rather trust Zac Nelson aka Jerryrigeverything over any company based tests which are made to make every device pass.

                  • A
                  • Anurag
                  • 7k2
                  • 30 Apr 2022

                  Bullshit....it seems a propoganda. I have used an OPPO flagship phone, the built quality is really low that my screen stopped working after a few months, even the after sales service and till centre were pathetic and it was really harrasment. I would never recommend OPPO to anyone.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • tZ0
                    • 30 Apr 2022

                    If this is Oppo's way of saying "our phones are overpriced because we built them to last!", I can only say RIP to those that believe this marketing BS.

                      I don't get the point of these video, what is Oppo trying to portray? All the big smartphone competitors like Apple, Google and Samsung goes through the same rigorous testing, nor did I hear about these company having poor build quality or defect, and if they do they rectify them on the next iteration. Don't trust Oppo, look at their OnePlus phone which bent like a biscuit. All marketing gimmicks.

                        Good To Know

                          Kangal, 29 Apr 2022I don't believe them. These tests can be done in a wa... moreThis internal testing is nothing new. Any serious company does this and not just smartphone companies. First they make virtual simulations in program where they can already test stress on components/materials under certain conditions and then they also do it for real, like bending folding phones backwards the way JRE does. It's just that they do it more systematically with force measuring contraptions and under repeatable conditions. Doing it with hands has no measure of force and can vary a lot just by gripping it different.

                          They also generally do this to see how much they can cheap out on things before launching products. Remember how appliances and cars lasted for decades in the past and now they can barely survive the warranty in most cases? In the past they just made the product to be as durable as possible, often making them overbuilt. Why make something out of metal if plastic is fine and it'll last for 3 years instead of 10, but will save them 90% of production cost?

                            • j
                            • johny
                            • YWY
                            • 29 Apr 2022

                            if you don't want to take the risk to break your phone, don't use a phone.

                              I don't believe them.
                              These tests can be done in a way that ensures most of their phones pass, even if they're flimsy. I rather trust someone who is a third-party and performs durability testing scientifically, or at the least earnestly.

                              And it's not just blind scrutiny. I've seen so many of their phones break, from OnePlus, Oppo, Vivo, Realme, etc etc. And it's not just them, most phones are worse these days. They just are not durable.

                              Here's why: because Apple has a huge lead in SoC performance, they're making their chipsets clock higher (6-14W, instead of 3-6W). But that negatively affects battery life, so they add a heavy battery. Then they make the phone have curved surfaces to sell the illusion of luxury. But that means using glass, which is a heavy material and it absorbs heat. Which means using a large heatsink too. The phone's external becomes quite slippery, hot, it is heavy, and very brittle/fragile. So chances of accidents goes up, and the consequences of accidents goes up.

                              All this is by design. Companies are trying to make more money, which comes from YOU the consumer. So they bump up the phones MSRP costs from USD $500 to $1500 in a 15-year period. This higher cost is used to justify increasing parts price. And parts are specifically made to discourage owner/third-party repair. So companies effectively create a second stream of income through refurbish business, and they get more repeat customers more often because the devices are more disposable/less durable-longevity.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • CbD
                                • 29 Apr 2022

                                It seems I purchased one of these battle tested phone..it broke at the first drop.

                                  "Built to last" but we'll only give you 1 or maybe 2 years of updates. We'll be generous and hand you 3 whole years if you spend 1000€ or more on our devices. Oppo probably.

                                    even if it is durable, i would not still buy them. what am i? construction worker?

                                      • C
                                      • Curiosity
                                      • tx0
                                      • 29 Apr 2022

                                      Make me wonder why bbk don't show us OnePlus 10 pro test ?

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • KAS
                                        • 29 Apr 2022

                                        They can perform one or thousands of these gimmick tests but they forget one simple fact

                                        Glass is glass 🙂