Alleged Galaxy S IV camera samples surface on Google+

07 February, 2013
Although not in full resolution, these S IV samples reveal two model names - for Korea and for AT&T US.

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-41271
  • H4w
  • 08 Feb 2013

AnonD-69184, 08 Feb 2013According to pocketnow.com,the gs3 is 1 of the best camera ... moreYou should update yourself.

    • D
    • AnonD-69184
    • fkV
    • 08 Feb 2013

    According to pocketnow.com,the gs3 is 1 of the best camera phones on the market.And if you read gsmarena's reviee of the lumia 920,you will see that the lumia's camera is nothing special when it comes to still shots and the gs3 actually take clearer shota,maybe it got the edge in video stabilization but that is about it.

      • W
      • Wise Guy
      • nDZ
      • 07 Feb 2013

      When I hear "accidentally", it's for sure that those pictures were uploaded well known.

        • D
        • AnonD-55045
        • Ps}
        • 07 Feb 2013

        Anonymous, 07 Feb 2013samsungs got some catching up to do. The quality of their ... moreI agree with the Nokia part. And since Sony's, Samsung and Apple's flagships all use Sony's sensors and so-so quality lenses and flashes, I'd say Sony could bump up a little their own sensors. However the quality of the images produced by the Xperia S or T, the iPhone 4S or 5 and the Galaxy S2 or S3 is dubiously different, if at all. Maybe the Xperia T could take some credit for the high pixel count. And none of those produce images as great as the Purview 808 or even the N8.

          This info is totally waste of time... it's better to wait and put some REAL information, than to put this stuff that no one needs =\ Everyone knows samsung will never put 6Mpix camera to SGS IV so why you posting it -.-

            • f
            • foxak
            • Lfw
            • 07 Feb 2013

            Something is wrong, see EXIF:

            Filename - 20130206_180048.jpg
            ImageWidth - 640
            ImageLength - 480
            Make - SAMSUNG
            Model - SPH-M840
            Orientation - Right top
            XResolution - 72
            YResolution - 72
            ResolutionUnit - Inch
            Software - M840VPAMB1
            DateTime - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
            YCbCrPositioning - Centered
            ExifOffset - 246
            ExposureTime - 1/40 seconds
            FNumber - 2.60
            ExposureProgram - Aperture priority
            ISOSpeedRatings - 100
            ExifVersion - 0220
            DateTimeOriginal - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
            DateTimeDigitized - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
            ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
            ShutterSpeedValue - 1/40 seconds
            ApertureValue - F 2.60
            ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
            MaxApertureValue - F 2.60
            MeteringMode - Center weighted average
            Flash - Not fired
            FocalLength - 3.55 mm
            UserComment - User comments
            FlashPixVersion - 0100
            ColorSpace - sRGB
            ExifImageWidth - 640
            ExifImageHeight - 480
            InteroperabilityOffset - 768
            ExposureMode - Auto
            White Balance - Auto
            SceneCaptureType - Standard

            GPS information: -
            GPSVersionID - 2.2.0.0

            Maker Note (Vendor): -

            Thumbnail: -
            ImageWidth - 512
            ImageLength - 384
            Compression - 6 (JPG)
            Orientation - Right top
            XResolution - 72
            YResolution - 72
            ResolutionUnit - Inch
            JpegIFOffset - 946
            JpegIFByteCount - 14887

              • D
              • AnonD-98439
              • m5D
              • 07 Feb 2013

              Waste of a post.

                • D
                • AnonD-86903
                • N}Y
                • 07 Feb 2013

                what a ridiculous post.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • Rn6
                  • 07 Feb 2013

                  samsungs got some catching up to do. The quality of their camera's have been sub par compared to to apple, nokia and sony's.

                  Build quality is not as good as apple's , NOkia's or HTC's.

                    5 of 5