Samsung Galaxy A04s in for review
- TheWildShadow55
- FSx
- 30 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 28 Oct 2022Hmm, the article mentioned "sharper display" the ... moreTheir mistake is not my fault, no need to call me unintelligent
- S
- Shadocx
- s0W
- 28 Oct 2022
TheWildShadow55, 26 Oct 2022Okay? Well the person you were replying to was talking abou... moreHmm, the article mentioned "sharper display" the writer was referring to the Galaxy A13, but "you have to suffer" thought the writer of the article was referring to the Galaxy A04s and mentioned 270 PPI, you guys should think more.
They were comparing both phones, they never said the Galaxy A04s(270 PPI) has a sharper display, they were referring to the Galaxy A13's display(400 PPI).
It's the last time I'm replying, there's nothing to add to this conversation.
- TheWildShadow55
- FSx
- 26 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 24 Oct 2022The article says: It's only ever bested, price-wise, b... moreOkay? Well the person you were replying to was talking about the A04s, NOT the A13
- you have to suffer
- XTM
- 25 Oct 2022
Sebstin, 24 Oct 20226.5" with ~270 ppi Why Samsung creates so much e-waste?dont just look at samsung. look at bbk. they have made so many e waste today
- ?
- Anonymous
- EUk
- 25 Oct 2022
hahaha! :)
its the same like S23
- Yext
- 6mM
- 25 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 24 Oct 2022https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=11449&id... moreWell, where I live the regular Redmi 10 is cheaper than the A04s and is the obviusly better choice.
- Yext
- 6mM
- 25 Oct 2022
Onanymaus, 25 Oct 2022Because the Exynos 850 is a weak chipset, having 720p displ... moreThat doesn't change the fact that for this price this phone is terrible.
- O
- Onanymaus
- tZj
- 25 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 24 Oct 2022The article says: It's only ever bested, price-wise, b... moreBecause the Exynos 850 is a weak chipset, having 720p display actually helped in giving better performance to the A04s.
- you have to suffer
- XTA
- 25 Oct 2022
Samsung user, 25 Oct 2022Yup, branding has a big role on samsung sales.
Triple ve... morebut atleast samsung offers better specs at the equivalent price to reno 7 4g😂😂 which is the galaxy a33 256gb version. trying to compare the reno to galaxy isnt a fair thing though. but i'll be comparing them to the price.
- S
- Samsung user
- KiW
- 25 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 24 Oct 2022https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=11449&id... moreIn my country (Indonesia), Galaxy A04s only costs about equivalent of USD 135.
- S
- Samsung user
- KiW
- 25 Oct 2022
you have to suffer, 24 Oct 2022the low end samsung A series were for the person who needs ... moreYup, branding has a big role on samsung sales.
Triple vertical camera lens on samsung phone is like three lines/stripes in adidas clothing.
- S
- Shadocx
- s0W
- 24 Oct 2022
IpsDisplay, 24 Oct 2022Gsmarena doesn't understand relativity And I feel b... moreYou're correct, they aren't ranking based on price brackets, so they always give highest ratings to flagships, it's probably easier to proceed like that.
- S
- Shadocx
- s0W
- 24 Oct 2022
you have to suffer, 24 Oct 2022the low end samsung A series were for the person who needs ... morehttps://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=11449&idPhone2=11803
Where I live the Redmi 10A is 150€ and the Galaxy A04s is 180€.
The Samsung is obviously the better choice but it doesn't have a charger in the box.
- S
- Shadocx
- s0W
- 24 Oct 2022
Ok, 24 Oct 2022I wonder who in the world would buy that phone. It's
... moreThe Galaxy A53 has the Exynos 1280, why are you surprised it performs bad?
- S
- Shadocx
- s0W
- 24 Oct 2022
TheWildShadow55, 24 Oct 2022This is not about the A13The article says: It's only ever bested, price-wise, by the Galaxy A13, which has a sharper display and an ultrawide camera over the A04s.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wrb
- 24 Oct 2022
The galaxy a04s is shipped with charger in my region.
- TheWildShadow55
- FSx
- 24 Oct 2022
Shadocx, 24 Oct 2022You really lack reading comprehension, the Galaxy A13 has 4... moreThis is not about the A13
- I
- IpsDisplay
- 4m}
- 24 Oct 2022
Gsmarena doesn't understand relativity
And I feel because of this they make poor reviews for super cheap smartphones
Their database is heavily leaning to mid range and flagship reviews
So I feel they lack the context of when to know a smartphone is incredible quality
So you basically never see a 4 plus star ratings for cheap phone
because they maybe judging
good camera quality based on subliminal programming/expectations from more expensive smartphones
Wish GSM reviewed more off brands like cubot,blackview, oukitel,umidigi,ulefone, doogee etc to get a better judgement on lowere tier smartphones
- T
- Tee
- D7y
- 24 Oct 2022
Super cheap phone, not price but internals, probably DOA.
- S
- Sebstin
- qJ5
- 24 Oct 2022
6.5" with ~270 ppi Why Samsung creates so much e-waste?