South Korea expects to be the first to launch a 6G network in 2028
- S
- Samath N8 808 owner
- U{B
- 22 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 22 Feb 2023Don't use sir or brother in public forumBy what logic? Are you not a human being who deserves respect?
Anyhow, humble apologies if you don't like it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- U@6
- 22 Feb 2023
Samath N8 808 owner, 22 Feb 2023Its a culture thing. We refer to someone as 'brother&#... moreDon't use sir or brother in public forum
- ?
- Anonymous
- J2t
- 22 Feb 2023
Meanwhile my "5G" connection barely gets me 30-50mbps speeds.
- S
- Samath N8 808 owner
- U{B
- 22 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023I'm not your brother. Fool.
You clearly have no und... moreIts a culture thing. We refer to someone as 'brother' as a sign of respect, but apparently things are very different, at the place where you come from. Or probably its an age thing.
Anyhow, I'm a MBA in Telecommunications and HRM, so I know what I'm talking about.
Low frequency communication (with high wavelength) is:- far reaching, less penetrating when it comes to walls or so, and generally carries low information as such.
High frequency (with low wavelength), the direction we are seeking, has lesser range, and is more penetrating in terms of walls and so, but can carry high information content. Which means far more fun, but hugely more infrastructure needed to support it.
You can check on Google if you want.
Overall the thing is, we've come to a point where its more intelligent to equip every building with accessable wifi with wired back end, and on cellular network, we need a reasonable data speed but a far more reliable cellular network.
Unless we go the satellite way for 6G, then its a different matter altogether.
- H
- Harris
- YUU
- 22 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 22 Feb 2023Who was first COUNTRY with 5G?Pretty sure it was china
- ?
- Anonymous
- tDF
- 22 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023the korean say always lie hahahahaha ... samsung top of the line now follow apple ... hahahahaha
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3xw
- 22 Feb 2023
Who was first COUNTRY with 5G?
- A
- AngryLithuanian
- xQI
- 22 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023why you comparing continent to a country 😂Read the comment I replied to and you'll understand.
- a
- ae86
- vaS
- 21 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023$450m is laughable amiunt comparison to China which has a s... morei believe thats just for starters, as there was also a report of $1.5b funds in collaboration with the US.
- ?
- Anonymous
- u7V
- 21 Feb 2023
AngryLithuanian, 21 Feb 2023Indonesia is 5 times smaller than Europe but I guess you ne... morewhy you comparing continent to a country 😂
- ?
- Anonymous
- u7V
- 21 Feb 2023
AngryLithuanian, 21 Feb 2023Indonesia is 5 times smaller than Europe but I guess you ne... moreare drunk? 😂
- ?
- Anonymous
- U@6
- 21 Feb 2023
I cry a lot, 21 Feb 2023the keyword is "perspective", you should consider... moreUsing that key, China is actually out performaning small and agile korea, with more than a billion population , yet China has the most 5G base stations per 1000 people in the entire world.
- ?
- Anonymous
- U@6
- 21 Feb 2023
Z, 21 Feb 2023Are you smoking crack? Didn't you read right here that... moreBarely behind means Zero
- ?
- Anonymous
- mAn
- 21 Feb 2023
Samath N8 808 owner, 21 Feb 2023Brother its not moving forward. I'll talk scientific, ... moreI'm not your brother. Fool.
You clearly have no understanding of cellular networks and their infrastructure. Everything you said goes against the way of science.
- ?
- Anonymous
- t5U
- 21 Feb 2023
6G is the future ftw
- P
- PhoneFreak45
- 46r
- 21 Feb 2023
People and companies are so obsessed with this connected future, they don't realize they already have all they need, and that by advancing the technology all they're doing is opening the door for more people to turn to the internet as a way to shut the world out. Very very few people will benefit from 6G in a meaningful way, just like few people have benefited from 5G in a meaningful way. I personally think it's time we start talking about the safety of these technologies. Call it a conspiracy theory if you wish, but the fact of the matter is that the only cellular technology that's been tested for safety is 3G, and that one study made the conclusion that being exposed to 3G radio signals caused considerably increased cancer rates in rats. Shouldn't we be having these conversations about the safety of the technology, knowing that 3G itself causes increased cancer rates in mammals? Shouldn't there be transparency, education, and extensive testing done on new technologies like this?
Just some food for thought. I doubt it'll make any difference but if anyone feels like reading it, here's the original study from 2018:
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm
- Bruce King
- cbd
- 21 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 20235G is barely being adapted around the world due to weak sig... moreHahahahahha
- z
- zipo
- 0Bk
- 21 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023You're confusing 5G with mmWave. 5G tech use various ... more700mhz = 4G, 700mhz is not even trying to fake 5G. that is what people are talking about - we are long way till 5G (most of 5G shortcomings are not limited by our current, but are limited laws of physics)
- I
- I cry a lot
- j4S
- 21 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 21 Feb 2023$450m is laughable amiunt comparison to China which has a s... morethe keyword is "perspective", you should consider how big is s korea vs china in term of population and landmass