Oppo releases first Find X6 Pro camera samples, confirms camera apertures

17 March 2023
The company is once again partnering with Hasselblad.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • fI%
  • 17 Mar 2023

The return of periscope zoom.. Lookin good.

Depending on the price, might consider upgrade to this from find x2 pro.

    Anonymous, 17 Mar 2023Prices for China 1) X6 - 12/256 : 4700 yuans ($682) ... moreYeah, that's the same as i saw. Same price as the Vivo x90 pro+ for the pro version. The Xiaomi 13 ultra will probably be the same as well or very similar anyway. Basically Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi flagships are now priced almost the same in China at least.

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 8N3
      • 17 Mar 2023

      Prices for China

      1) X6
      - 12/256 : 4700 yuans ($682)
      - 16/512: 5200 yuans ($755)

      2) X6 pro
      - 12/256: 6500 yuans ($943)
      - 16/256: 6800 yuans ($987)
      - 16/512: 7000 yuans ($1016)

        Anton-, 17 Mar 2023and that's exactly why I like these phones! very few p... moreGo for Meizu then. I guarantee you won't see many of them around even in China!

          Aierlan, 17 Mar 2023I think they just don't want to waste money. Hardly an... moreand that's exactly why I like these phones! very few people have it, in the streets you go out and you find samsung, low-end xioami and iphone, only! They do not stand out because almost all of them have one of these brands

            rizki1, 17 Mar 2023BBK is afraid that someone will complain because it's ... moreI think they just don't want to waste money. Hardly anybody would buy this phone in global markets. Even in China sales won't be that good. Even if the phone is top class it won't sell in sufficient numbers to justify the cost of a global release. Oppo needs more time to build their brand image before they can sell premium $1,600 phones in global markets. Xiaomi is a bit more established globally so they have a head start but the Xiaomi 13 ultra will also not sell well in global markets if released as promised by Lei Jun. If the brands believed these phones would be a success globally then of course they'd all release them as all companies have one thing in common. They want to make as much money as possible and the profit margin on premium flagships is much higher than on midrangers or budget phones

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • 8N3
              • 17 Mar 2023

              Nick Tegrataker, 17 Mar 2023And? For example, even when you crop the image from this te... moreXperia 1iv can record 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps at 85, 87, 90, 91, 94, 98, 103, 105, 107, 112, 115, 118, 122 or 125mm.

              Oppo cant. Cropping and turning 4K into FHD and keeping FHD or upscaling itt ack to 4K like many phones without a 50-60mm do, which is nasty and even shittier quality.

              About the light gathering dont forget that it is not just hardware size. Photodiodes are not all equal.
              There are different types with different light sensitivity levels.
              Imx989 is regual dual layer. The next iphone pro to have the pixel layer and circuit layers apart , that doubles pixel area.

              By the way, this watermark is wrong. Lens is 65mm but is gonna output 72mm equivalent. Digitally, no option to turn off like huasei/honor do 23mm🔄27mm.

              If even sony can afford zoom lens while making bit over $3 bi/year with xperia, guess oppo can afford too while making 10x more revenue ( despite selling 40x more devices) , unless Find X is selling not even half million units .



                What I care about tho: corner quality, hi res quality, speed of taking hi res hdr raw, global availability.

                  • L
                  • Lccy
                  • 3xd
                  • 17 Mar 2023

                  23mm is far too wide, you don't need a 1 inch type sensor to take decent photos in daylight, I would rather a more natural focal length at the expense of a slightly smaller sensor.

                    • B
                    • Blitzz
                    • LaJ
                    • 17 Mar 2023

                    Is that camera module a verbatim dvd?

                      Anton-, 17 Mar 2023Another one that doesn't go. get out of china! it se... moreBBK is afraid that someone will complain because it's expensive... even if it is expensive but better than others especially Apple or Samsung.

                        Everyone fighting for the focal apertures of the lenses and the cell phone will not leave China... BBk watching these fights: 🤡🤣🤣🤣

                          Anonymous, 17 Mar 2023And at 66mm already needs to rely on digital zoom. For sti... moreAnd? For example, even when you crop the image from this telephoto camera to, let's say, 125mm equivalent, it still captures more light than the one on Xperia 1 IV per FoV. The physical aperture size of this periscope lens is actually pretty damn massive, and it has a lot of pixels to waste in case it needs to perform digital zoom. I don't really see its relatively short full-frame equivalent focal length as a problem.

                            Another one that doesn't go. get out of china! it seems that BBk is afraid of success

                              The nighttime photo from the main camera looks astonishingly decent given how dark the scene must have been, highlights are incredibly well controlled and I can even see some details captured on a tent where the focus is set to. This kind of scene would be borderline impossible for my a6000 to capture properly even if I use the brightest lens I have (30mm F1.4 Sigma) with it, unless I shoot in continuous bracketing mode on a tripod and stack multiple images together on my PC. Smartphone cameras are getting so ridiculously good these days.

                              I'm slightly less impressed by the telephoto sample though - It's a 2.2x digital zoom from the telephoto lens so I was expecting some degree of per-pixel quality degradation, but even then the amount of sharpening is just way too much IMO. It's got a big sensor and resolution, no need to rely on excessive edge enhancement.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • 8N3
                                • 17 Mar 2023

                                notafanboy, 17 Mar 2023Absolutely breathtaking samplesBecause you have seen the crap ones oneplus ceo posted on weibo.

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • 8N3
                                  • 17 Mar 2023

                                  Nick Tegrataker, 17 Mar 2023You do realise that this 69mm equivalent lens captures more... moreAnd at 66mm already needs to rely on digital zoom. For stills and videos.


                                  Where is that 80-200mm lens? In the drawer and it will never come out, because zoom lens is way more expensive than primes.

                                    Absolutely breathtaking samples

                                      • D
                                      • AnonD-1087127
                                      • 39x
                                      • 17 Mar 2023

                                      Amazing

                                        Anonymous, 17 Mar 2023Periscope fixed at 65mm. So pathetic. Better using sma... moreYou do realise that this 69mm equivalent lens captures more light than ANY OTHER telephoto camera put on a smartphone per FoV, right? More than Xiaomi, Samsung, Sony, Honor, literally everyone. We're finally about to have a manufacturer that seriously cares about the image quality of a telephoto camera, yet here you are, immediately complaining about it.

                                          2 of 3