Honor V Purse in for review
- you have to suffer
- txG
- 28 Dec 2023
it looks nice and clean without the chain.
with it, it looks ugly and adds more chance of getting the phone stolen. just my point, i know it was not made for mass market. but who thought putting chain on a phone is a good idea?
- B
- Batteri Voltas
- 6sS
- 27 Dec 2023
Why are people so pressed over a chain?
This was NEVER meant to be a mass market phone, this was purely going to be a halo model. If you're not wearing a dress or something without pockets, just get that chain-case thingy off and you have a Mate X-esque horizontal folding phone for under a grand.
Yes, it doesn't have flagship specs, but we need to look past the classic spec-bragging/heavy SoC bias that the GSMA comment section has become.
Not every phone is a Poco F5
- ?
- Anonymous
- spX
- 26 Dec 2023
thieves will be happy
- ?
- Anonymous
- 05e
- 26 Dec 2023
The manufacturer sponsored censorship on this site is beyond sickening.
- David 040882
- spY
- 25 Dec 2023
SpiritWolf, 25 Dec 2023A lot of formal dresses have zero pockets. Pretty obvious t... moreI mean, no offense, but who wears dresses all the time? Only in some situations, and having a purse-phone only for those situations isn't...ideal if you ask me, but whatever. Also, "....and you wear pockets that have pants." Check your grammar
- S
- SpiritWolf
- pV7
- 25 Dec 2023
David 040882, 24 Dec 2023"Whose formal wear doesn't have pockets" 💀 L... moreA lot of formal dresses have zero pockets. Pretty obvious that You don't give a damn. Or are just too young and wear pockets that have pants.
- p
- potato4k
- I2Y
- 25 Dec 2023
Lonteku , 24 Dec 2023This is the proof that honor still under Huawei ownership. ... moreI thought it was obvious. Anybody who thought otherwise was naive. The selling of the brand is just a formality to satisfy the gullible US politicians.
- David 040882
- spY
- 25 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 25 Dec 2023Practicality and usefulness are at the bottom of the list w... moreYeah you got a point there
- ?
- Anonymous
- 05e
- 25 Dec 2023
"Hey, let's make a dumb version of Samsung's lanyard variations".
- H
- Hummus
- txE
- 25 Dec 2023
Folks, this is a fashion item.
Maybe it doesn't make sense (technologically?) for us, but that's not the point.
- ?
- Anonymous
- yZR
- 25 Dec 2023
David 040882, 24 Dec 2023"Whose formal wear doesn't have pockets" 💀 L... morePracticality and usefulness are at the bottom of the list when it comes to the fashion industry. In fact, I think the less practical the clothing is, the more expensive it tends to be with fashion brands.
- G
- Gaia
- Y7W
- 24 Dec 2023
It innovates the same way the weird old prototype cars did during the 60's. It shows something new, but most likely it will not hit the rest of the world because it's not practical and has it no use, other than showing what Honor can do.
- David 040882
- spY
- 24 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2023Here's a clue. It's the group of people this phon... moreAnyways, don't care enough to search more stuff about it. It's a weird concept, and definitely not one we would've needed. Interesting? For the average consumer, yeah, maybe. Unique? Maybe too much. Unasked for? Not a single person asked for something like this. Could've spent money into another concept with actual useful features and not just a phone-purse for the people who buy pocketless pants for whatever reason? Yes, you could've, Honor.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mpr
- 24 Dec 2023
David 040882, 24 Dec 2023Mind saving me the decades it'll take for me to find o... moreHere's a clue. It's the group of people this phone is marketed towards, who carry a purse when their clothes don't pockets. Look at the promotional images if you need more help. Good luck
- David 040882
- spY
- 24 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2023Lol when you are a bit older you will learn the answer to t... moreMind saving me the decades it'll take for me to find out the answer to something I don't really give a damn about, anyway?
- ?
- Anonymous
- mpr
- 24 Dec 2023
David 040882, 24 Dec 2023"Whose formal wear doesn't have pockets" 💀 L... moreLol when you are a bit older you will learn the answer to that question
- David 040882
- spY
- 24 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2023The images clearly show it's marketed towards people w... more"Whose formal wear doesn't have pockets" 💀 Like who goes into a shop and buys only pocketless pants thinking "Oh yeah, not having pockets will be much more ideal and helpful. Therefore I'll wear my phone, keys and wallet like a purse around my neck so I'll be an easier target to random thugs. Wow such a good idea".
- ?
- Anonymous
- mpr
- 24 Dec 2023
David 040882, 24 Dec 2023A bit stupid mate. There's literally no need and no ma... moreThe images clearly show it's marketed towards people whose formal wear doesn't have pockets, and who are rich enough to buy a smartphone as an accessory. The product itself looks great. It's a medium sized phone that folds out to a small tablet. It's thinner and lighter than anything comparable. The marketing strategy is even better, since a certain type of person gets so outraged and confused by the idea of a smartphone branded towards the feminine half of the market that they start to think that Purse is a regular noun, rather than a brand name. You're right it's a concept phone, hopefully now you get the concept
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3k6
- 24 Dec 2023
magnificent product unfortunately reserved for a couple of countries. Innovative mid-foldable with a reasonable price (I read it is around 1000 dollars), solidly built.. they demonstrate that they know how to innovate without sitting on their laurels like..some coreans.
- p
- potato4k
- XZ8
- 24 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2023No. If this was the case, then would not be sold How do you know people are buying these?
Having a concept product actually available for sale can be great for marketing. Something like this and actually having it "available" for purchase makes people interested in your brand. It solidifies your brand and commitment to the technology. I'm sure Honor doesn't really expect this to be selling. They expect people to buy their Magic foldables instead.