Mark Zuckerberg disses Apple's Vision Pro, unsurprisingly thinks the Meta Quest 3 is better

14 February 2024
"The future is not yet written".

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 05e
  • 15 Feb 2024

DarlingYext, 15 Feb 2024Better? Better at what exactly? These two products are for ... moreAh, the fallback when the facts are indisputable. You can _only_ compare the absolute and rare specifics the ǝlddɐ product "benchmarks" better. The way ǝlddɐ always deflects from reality. Maybe we should call ǝlddɐ's alternative the virtual virtual reality? It's virtually as good as virtual reality, just a _lot_ more expensive, for zero good reasons at all.

The dealbreaker for the ǝlddɐ product is indeed the weight. Just look at how often ǝlddɐ's "viral" actors has to adjust the headset in those minute long promos. It looks nauseatingly uncomfortable. But hey, when you're obsessed with "premium" materials over function, people do end up buying apple, don't they?

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • tEZ
    • 15 Feb 2024

    Ouifuf, 15 Feb 2024It just isn't. Higher res screens and that's it. ... moreFor 500 buck you only get the screen, just 1 screen not the pair neede to make vr headset

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • IVW
      • 15 Feb 2024

      Shhhhhhh Mark Zuckerberg dun mock Apple!
      More you mock, more stronger Apple become

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • Snd
        • 15 Feb 2024

        How about both are waste of money and materials?

          • L
          • Lurker
          • 0u@
          • 15 Feb 2024

          Ouifuf, 15 Feb 2024It just isn't. Higher res screens and that's it. ... moreSure bro, 500 dollars.

            justasmile, 15 Feb 2024Mock Apple as much as they want, but they're actually ... moreAnother victim of apple's marketing. Only thing better about the vision is the screen. The rest is literally a major downgrade

              justasmile, 15 Feb 2024Mock Apple as much as they want, but they're actually ... moreIt just isn't. Higher res screens and that's it. It's heavier, less functionality, and overpriced. This should be a $500 headset at most.

                Mock Apple as much as they want, but they're actually being ridiculous calling the Meta Quest 3 better. Sure, Apple Vision Pro is expensive, but the tech is still much better than the Meta.

                  Better? Better at what exactly? These two products are for two completely different types of people. Calling the Quest 3 "a better product, period" is just simply a lie anyways, it's a different product, is what it is. The Vision Pro is the technically more impressive one though.

                    The future is written: headsets that plug into PCs and consoles will exist, as will smart glass that connect to phones, but there will not be a standalone headset that runs off of a battery, because the battery life is just not good enough.

                      IpsDisplay, 14 Feb 2024The losers are ordinary people that fall in the trap of pic... moreKind of like the Google & Apple fanboys..lol

                        The losers are ordinary people that fall in the trap of picking sides

                        Meanwhile this billionaire and billionaire company just laugh in the bank

                        While the public just get distracted and waste Thier time.. well at least the comments get the algorithms running and puts even more money 💰 in their pockets.. and more free advertising

                          3 of 3