Samsung Galaxy A35 battery life test

20 March 2024
Unsurprisingly, a 5,000mAh battery does a good job.

Sort by:

  • I
  • IQ200
  • Lec
  • 10 Apr 2024

PanRT, 20 Mar 2024I'm just pointing out that the Exytrash performs like ... moreType in your favorite browser: why is (almost) every Chinese mobile brand more affordable then any non-Chinese. So what that means? Should all non-Chinese brands just shut their bussiness? I guess so. Why? Because Chinese phones are better in eVeRYtHiNg and at the same time they are far cheaper. Right...

    Anonymous, 20 Mar 2024How A35 has better battery life than A54 when they both hav... moreThis is done by underclocking the cpu like google pixel. running at full speed would overheat and drain real quick. so basically, you may get 60% of the entire cpu power while resulting in less heat and battery drain. just to hide its weakness of exystove. while average joe would not notice it, while scrolling on their facebook and tiktok..

      Anonymous, 20 Mar 2024And their displays are the worst. Soneone i know got burn i... moreperhaps they play games at max brightness. hence the burn in issue.

        For a 400 eur device said results are horrible.

          • L
          • Luke
          • xIj
          • 21 Mar 2024

          LoneOwl, 20 Mar 2024I am once again confused with these results. Galaxy A35 ... moreIt won't be the first time Samsung tweaked the software to make a device look better than it is. Next sw update (or straight out of the box, if GSMArena got "special" device)
          and we will see completely different results

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • mIm
            • 21 Mar 2024

            Awesome, Samsung is the best

              Hemedans, 20 Mar 2024First neither 8 gen 1 nor E2200 had 4Lpp they have differen... moreIt doesnt matter if its not 4lpp, you posted a source claiming 8g1 was actually just rebranded 5nm, but 2200 was actual 4nm. But 8g1 matches 2200 efficiency.

              Im not talking about benchmark scores, but the efficiency curves you can see on socpk. Again 8+g1 is better efficiency.

              Node comparison is ok if both have same cores and by same soc maker, its just your use of sd vs mtk for claiming superioity of samsung 5nm over tsmc 6nm that is the problem. You took the one soc maker with better efficiency that happened be on samsung node with a worse one on tsmc node.



                PanRT, 20 Mar 2024I'm just pointing out that the Exytrash performs like ... moreYou sound like a 16 year old child calling a component ' exytrash'. F.f.s., rather immature.

                  1989 nothinghappened, 20 Mar 20248g1 is just mentioned there to show sd has about the same e... moreFirst neither 8 gen 1 nor E2200 had 4Lpp they have different node but both are inferior to 4Lpp so is 4 gen 2.

                  Second the difference between 8+ gen 1 and D9000 is just rounding error, in any benchmarks, anywhere difference below 10% is nothing to talk about,

                  Third all soc with same cores there sd 695, 4 gen 1, 4 gen 2, D920, 780, 778G etc show almost same cpu curve there may be difference but really small, at same time all cpu with better Manufacturing process and same core shows superior perfomance, like D8100 is above all those cpu, if this don't show tier of manufacturing process I don't know what else will.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • dW8
                    • 20 Mar 2024

                    you have to suffer, 20 Mar 2024vivo's Li-Po battery were the best. you can thank them... moreAnd their displays are the worst. Soneone i know got burn in on the display of a Vivo phone in 2 months.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • gXJ
                      • 20 Mar 2024

                      The clock speed has seen a downtick compared to the A34 (2.6GHz vs 2.4GHz), but the Dimensity 1080 had 2 performance and 6 efficiency cores, versus 4 performance and 4 efficiency cores on the Exynos 1380.

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • gXJ
                        • 20 Mar 2024

                        Hugo, 20 Mar 2024The moto g84 isnt in the same place range. Here in India th... moreNo, they're comparing battery life, not the overall experience.

                          Hemedans, 20 Mar 20248g1 and 2200 use different manufacture process as i linked ... more8g1 is just mentioned there to show sd has about the same efficiency even with the supposedly rebranded 5nm vs actual 4nm on 2200. 8+g1 vs 9000 was to show sd has higher efficiency when both on same node. So sd 4g2 having higher efficiency vs d920 isnt really a good example of node comparison.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • JH9
                            • 20 Mar 2024

                            A34 is just fine. Yes, it has that Infinity-U cutout, but it's very small. The bigger incovenience for me would be the fact that, it's just a bit too big for my liking (basically the size of S2x+ series), but you can get used to it with one handed mode, customisable gestures and such.

                            Now, A35 is heavier than its predecessor by 10g. Slap a case on top of that and you get a throwable brick lol. Battery life is amazing anyway, so if you have A34 / A54... there's no reason to upgrade. Unless you would like an even bulkier device lol

                              ENTER0, 20 Mar 2024kinda weird to see a54 losing to a35 on battery test which ... moreIt's oneui 6.1 in a35. Which is obviously better and more optimised. My a54 is running oneui 6.0

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • XKG
                                • 20 Mar 2024

                                Using my A34 and enjoying it. This is not even worth an upgrade as yet.

                                  kinda weird to see a54 losing to a35 on battery test which has bigger screen than a54 while they both have Same chipset and same battery..(I wonder if one ui 6 is better optimized on a35 than a54)

                                    1989 nothinghappened, 20 Mar 20248g1 vs 2200? Infact 8g1 prime is higher clocked, but better... more8g1 and 2200 use different manufacture process as i linked before, am talking about comparison between sd and Mtk, both 8+ gen 1 vs D9000 and 8 gen 2 vs 9200 have almost same curve at low power then different at high power, even that difference at high power isnt much to mean anything, so my point nowadays same core at same manufacturing process means nothing it will be same. Until Oryon cores come out.

                                      PartTimePhoner, 20 Mar 2024And why would they do that? They aren't selling any phones.Paid reviews is a thing you know. Specially when Samsung has been trying for years to wash the image of their Exynos chipsets.

                                        I am happy to see that Samsung has fixed the efficiency problem that the Exynos SoCs are notorious for. However, the stand-by and modem power consumption could be better considering A15 has 45 hours of call endurance.

                                        In addition, I would like to see another test with A34 limited to LTE because rather high power consumption during calls (compared to A15) may be due to 5G.

                                          1 of 4