3nm Exynos 2500 tipped to be more efficient than Snapdragon 8 Gen 4
- ?
- Anonymous
- m%3
- 14 Jun 2024
E2400 is a really good chip this year, I expect E2500 to be really good as well....Exynos is back baby!
- ?
- Anonymous
- sgj
- 02 Jun 2024
Samsung's promise as every year. Also faakely pushed for benchmarks.
Resulting in toasty stuttering laggy processor.
If at least they'd make it cheap, but giving the price of s24... Ouch. Misinformed people buying that so expensive for what it is' just buying the brand in fact.
- ?
- Anonymous
- sgj
- 07 May 2024
Kangal, 06 May 2024Sounds like Samsung is getting back into the fight, it'... moreShould be another competitor in os too but which one ? Linux not make sense, android is mostly Linux already. And how Linux is really 'free' and 'open' and the people from Linux foundation minus and all get paid from Google & co...
So many have failed, FF os and even ms win phone ( which was great to me but too extremely closed )
I recall that competition needs at least 3 competitors otherwise is oligopole sth like that.
- ?
- Anonymous
- sgj
- 07 May 2024
Kangal, 06 May 2024Sounds like Samsung is getting back into the fight, it'... moreCould be the real coming back this time.
Good for competion, and not only ARMs.
Samsung is known to have not been doing so bad on their 3nm
Let's see in real, so many Exynos fakepromises last years.
- Kangal
- Hqa
- 06 May 2024
Sounds like Samsung is getting back into the fight, it's just too bad they've lost a lot of their potential.
I actually liked their ambition, and pushing for their custom architecture. They should have kept their in-house department and continue developing Mongoose. They lack in the GPU/NPU side, so it would've been great if Samsung was the one to acquire Imagination Technologies. Their fabrications were pretty competitive too until 2018. And now we're seeing a whole system being built. Not to mention they also manufacture the memory, storage, camera, display, and the housing modules. They're the real deal.
In fact, I would've loved to see Samsung stay away from Windows Phone and Android, and instead to partner with Nokia to build a Linux-Ecosystem for phones, tablets, laptops, desktops, TV Consoles. I had their first BadaOS and it was quite revolutionary at the time.
You know, to have an extra horse in the race:
(iOS) Apple + Motorola
("Curios") Samsung + Nokia
("Windows Mobile") Microsoft + Blackberry + HTC
("Android") Google + LG + Sony + Siemens
....that would've been so good, instead of this slow and stale monopoly we have today!
- N
- Not Again
- miA
- 29 Apr 2024
The Exynos 2500 WILL be better than its competitor Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 both in power efficiency and raw performance, according to a post by PandaFlashPro on X (formerly Twitter),
You would expect such a definitive statement to have a basis in fact.
When it is deleted ( the source is gone!)
It shows like some commentators, the buzz is just to post, there is no actual knowledge of anything
- B
- Bruv...
- N}W
- 28 Apr 2024
BingBang, 20 Apr 2024Efficiency is okay. What about the ISP? The Exynos 2400 wa... moreBro....Did you not see the reviews and comparisons...or are you breathing pure copium? That's all I have to say to you.
- I
- Igor
- X@n
- 27 Apr 2024
Anonymous, 21 Apr 2024Samsung should use dimensity processors..learn from mediate... moreMediatek processors aren't very efficient though, 9300 is raw performance with heating issues.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3xJ
- 25 Apr 2024
Anonymous, 20 Apr 2024Watch test videos first. It reloads more than a proper Andr... moreif you mean old iPhone year but since iPhone 13 nope
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0Uc
- 24 Apr 2024
Samsung needs to sort the mobile network standby - it's pretty bad on Exynos chips. Got a S23 with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and it barely drains the baterry overnight.
- V
- Vicky Exy7420
- XZf
- 21 Apr 2024
Anonymous, 21 Apr 2024You almost got it all right, until you derailed on "al... moreDunno anything about regulators. Maybe ur right or not. But Samsung in the past sold Exynos 5G processors in the US like 880,980 or most recent 1330,1380. So I guessed in the renewed aggreement signed in 21-22 allowed that maybe.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 05e
- 21 Apr 2024
Vicky Exy7420, 21 Apr 2024Bro, Qualcomm & Samsung had an agreement under which Qu... moreYou almost got it all right, until you derailed on "allowed to sell mid-range Exynos processors in the lucrative Qualcomm-dominated market".
If Qualcomm would put that in writing, Samsung would have it black on white for the regulators.
- s
- sefan.
- ssc
- 21 Apr 2024
honestly Exynos is kinda killing it this year but snapdragon is always racing their way to the top, I'm still using my old android tablet with a Snapdragon 439™ and it's still crushing It No problems with games on medium graphics Whatsoever, I'm thinking about trying Exynos for the first time Tell me if you guys recommend it Or Not!
- V
- Vicky Exy7420
- XZf
- 21 Apr 2024
BingBang, 20 Apr 2024Efficiency is okay. What about the ISP? The Exynos 2400 wa... moreBro, Qualcomm & Samsung had an agreement under which Qualcomm prevented Samsung from selling to other OEMs as well as Apple. In exchange, Samsung got favourable pricing, preferential inventory access, allowed to sell mid-range Exynos processors in the lucrative Qualcomm-dominated market (ie in the USA & CHINA) & less Royalty charged for the Samsung 5G modems. So it's a win-win situation for both companies.
- ?
- Anonymous
- sS2
- 21 Apr 2024
Samsung should use dimensity processors..learn from mediatek if you want to be efficient..don’t make me laugh please..
- F
- Flamezim
- M3V
- 21 Apr 2024
It doesn't make sense for Samsung to use the Google Pixel Tensor, since Google's processors are manufactured by Samsung
- MindTheGap
- txE
- 21 Apr 2024
JLC, 20 Apr 2024Focus is not a copy of Bixby routines. It is almost an exac... moreIt is, mate, and Samsung never removed it. They just changed the name from "Bixby Routines" to "Modes and Routines".
- ?
- Anonymous
- K@d
- 21 Apr 2024
Usually, semiconductor development produces decent results in about six years. If there are no results, the project is a failure. Samsung has been working on it for 13 years, but has yet to produce decent results. Why?
By the way, Samsung's foundries have been holding back Snapdragon. Whenever they manufacture it, it always burns. Even though they made relentless presentations and pitched it in advance as being superior to others.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XUv
- 21 Apr 2024
Vegetaholic, 20 Apr 2024Of course, the shitty minded people believe there is no way... more"Of course, the shitty minded people believe there is no way Samsung can make better foundries than TSMC,"
Respect is earned, not given.
After samsung proff that it delivered, then we respect Samsung
- ?
- Anonymous
- Dk1
- 21 Apr 2024
BingBang, 20 Apr 2024Efficiency is okay. What about the ISP? The Exynos 2400 wa... moreWhat X85?